- 01 10月, 2018 40 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Reduce contention on the inode->i_lock by ensuring that we use RCU when looking up the NFS open context. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Speed up lookups of an existing lock context by avoiding the inode->i_lock, and using RCU instead. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
For the 'files' and 'flexfiles' layout types, we do not expect the reply to be any larger than 4k. The block and scsi layout types are a little more greedy, so we keep allocating the maximum response size for now. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need a zeroed out array, since it is immediately being filled. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It is no longer used outside of net/sunrpc/socklib.c Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Simplify the retry logic. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In preparation for sharing with AF_LOCAL. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Most of this code should also be reusable with other socket types. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a bvec array to struct xdr_buf, and have the client allocate it when we need to receive data into pages. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the RPC call relies on the receive call allocating pages as buffers, then let's label it so that we a) Don't leak memory by allocating pages for requests that do not expect this behaviour b) Can optimise for the common case where calls do not require allocation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We no longer need priority semantics on the xprt->sending queue, because the order in which tasks are sent is now dictated by their position in the send queue. Note that the backlog queue remains a priority queue, meaning that slot resources are still managed in order of task priority. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix up the priority queue to not batch by owner, but by queue, so that we allow '1 << priority' elements to be dequeued before switching to the next priority queue. The owner field is still used to wake up requests in round robin order by owner to avoid single processes hogging the RPC layer by loading the queues. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server is slow, we can find ourselves with quite a lot of entries on the receive queue. Converting the search from an O(n) to O(log(n)) can make a significant difference, particularly since we have to hold a number of locks while searching. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Treat socket write space handling in the same way we now treat transport congestion: by denying the XPRT_LOCK until the transport signals that it has free buffer space. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The theory was that we would need to grab the socket lock anyway, so we might as well use it to gate the allocation of RPC slots for a TCP socket. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This no longer causes them to lose their place in the transmission queue. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Rather than forcing each and every RPC task to grab the socket write lock in order to send itself, we allow whichever task is holding the write lock to attempt to drain the entire transmit queue. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Avoid memory starvation by giving RPCs that are tagged with the RPC_TASK_SWAPPER flag the highest priority. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Both RDMA and UDP transports require the request to get a "congestion control" credit before they can be transmitted. Right now, this is done when the request locks the socket. We'd like it to happen when a request attempts to be transmitted for the first time. In order to support retransmission of requests that already hold such credits, we also want to ensure that they get queued first, so that we don't deadlock with requests that have yet to obtain a credit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
One of the intentions with the priority queues was to ensure that no single process can hog the transport. The field task->tk_owner therefore identifies the RPC call's origin, and is intended to allow the RPC layer to organise queues for fairness. This commit therefore modifies the transmit queue to group requests by task->tk_owner, and ensures that we round robin among those groups. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Remove the checks for whether or not we need to transmit, and whether or not a reply has been received. Those are already handled in call_transmit() itself. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the request is still on the queue, this will be incorrect behaviour. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we shift to using the transmit queue, then the task that holds the write lock will not necessarily be the same as the one being transmitted. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix up the back channel code to recognise that it has already been transmitted, so does not need to be called again. Also ensure that we set req->rq_task. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the call encoding so that it occurs before the transport connection etc. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add the queue that will enforce the ordering of RPC task transmission. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When storing a struct rpc_rqst on the slot allocation list, we currently use the same field 'rq_list' as we use to store the request on the receive queue. Since the structure is never on both lists at the same time, this is OK. However, for clarity, let's make that a union with different names for the different lists so that we can more easily distinguish between the two states. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Allow the caller in clnt.c to call into the code to wait for a reply after calling xprt_transmit(). Again, the reason is that the backchannel code does not need this functionality. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Separate out the action of adding a request to the reply queue so that the backchannel code can simply skip calling it altogether. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We will use the same lock to protect both the transmit and receive queues. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Rather than waking up the entire queue of RPC messages a second time, just wake up the task that was put to sleep. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When asked to wake up an RPC task, it makes sense to test whether or not the task is still queued. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a helper that will wake up a task that is sleeping on a specific queue, and will set the value of task->tk_status. This is mainly intended for use by the transport layer to notify the task of an error condition. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We are going to need to pin for both send and receive. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-