- 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Revert commit eed4d47e (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered a number of different issues on various systems. That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik. The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work is needed for this purpose. Reported-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Drivers that needs acpi_device_fix_up_power(), allow them to be built as modules by exporting this function. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.5+ Tested-by: NLaszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomeu Vizoso 提交于
Adds a function that sets the pointer to dev_pm_domain in struct device and that warns if the device has already finished probing. The reason why we want to enforce that is because in the general case that can cause problems and also that we can simplify code quite a bit if we can always assume that. This patch also changes all current code that directly sets the dev.pm_domain pointer. Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 14 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a concern that if the platform firmware was involved in the system resume that's being completed, some devices might have been reset by it and if those devices had the power.direct_complete flag set during the preceding suspend transition, they may stay in a reset-power-on state indefinitely (until they are runtime-resumed and then suspended again). That may not be a big deal from the individual device's perspective, but if the system is an SoC, it may be prevented from entering deep SoC-wide low-power states on idle because of that. The devices that are most likely to be affected by this issue are PCI devices and ACPI-enumerated devices using the general ACPI PM domain, so to prevent it from happening for those devices, force a runtime resume for them if they have their power.direct_complete flags set and the platform firmware was involved in the resume transition currently in progress. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Commit 20dacb71 ("ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6") changed the device power management to use D3hot if the device in question does not have _PR3 method even if D3cold was requested by the caller. However, if the device has _PR3 device->power.state is also set to D3hot instead of D3Cold after power resources have been turned off because device->power.state will be assigned from "state" instead of "target_state". Next time the device is transitioned to D0, acpi_power_transition() will find that the current power state of the device is D3hot instead of D3cold which causes it to power down all resources required for the current (wrong) state D3hot. Below is a simplified ASL example of a real touch panel device which triggers the problem: Scope (TPL1) { Name (_PR0, Package (1) { \_SB.PCI0.I2C1.PXTC }) Name (_PR3, Package (1) { \_SB.PCI0.I2C1.PXTC }) ... } In both D0 and D3hot the same power resource is required. However, when acpi_power_transition() turns off power resources required for D3hot (as the device is transitioned to D0) it powers down PXTC which then makes the device to lose its power. Fix this by assigning "target_state" to the device power state instead of "state" that is always D3hot even for devices with valid _PR3. Fixes: 20dacb71 (ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6) Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Some devices, like MFD subdevices, share a single ACPI companion device so that they are able to access their resources and children. However, currently all these subdevices are attached to the ACPI power domain and this might cause that the power methods for the companion device get called more than once. In order to solve this we attach the ACPI power domain only to the first physical device that is bound to the ACPI companion device. In case of MFD devices, this is the parent MFD device itself. Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
-
- 08 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jarkko Nikula 提交于
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: NJarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add missing invocation of pm_generic_complete() to acpi_subsys_complete() to allow ->complete callbacks provided by the drivers of devices using the ACPI PM domain to be executed during system resume. Fixes: f25c0ae2 (ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend) Cc: 3.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.16+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI 6 specification has made some changes in the device power management area. In particular: * The D3hot power state is now supposed to be always available (instead of D3cold) and D3cold is only regarded as valid if the _PR3 object is present for the given device. * The required ordering of transitions into power states deeper than D0 is now such that for a transition into state Dx the _PSx method is supposed to be executed first, if present, and the states of the power resources the device depends on are supposed to be changed after that. * It is now explicitly forbidden to transition devices from lower-power (deeper) into higher-power (shallower) power states other than D0. Those changes have been made so the specification reflects the Windows' device power management code that the vast majority of systems using ACPI is validated against. To avoid artificial differences in ACPI device power management between Windows and Linux, modify the ACPI device power management code to follow the new specification. Add comments explaining the code flow in some unclear places. This only may affect some real corner cases in which the OS behavior expected by the firmware is different from the Windows one, but that's quite unlikely. The transition ordering change affects transitions to D1 and D2 which are rarely used (if at all) and into D3hot and D3cold for devices actually having _PR3, but those are likely to be validated against Windows anyway. The other changes may affect code calling acpi_device_get_power() or acpi_device_update_power() where ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may be returned instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD (that's why the ACPI fan driver needs to be updated too) and since transitions into ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may remove power now, it is better to avoid this one in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() if the "no power off" PM QoS flag is set. The only existing user of acpi_device_can_poweroff() really cares about the case when _PR3 is present, so the change in that function should not cause any problems to happen too. A plus is that PCI_D3hot can be mapped to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT now and the compatibility with older systems should be covered automatically. In any case, if any real problems result from this, it still will be better to follow the Windows' behavior (which now is reflected by the specification too) in general and handle the cases when it doesn't work via quirks. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Ruprecht 提交于
In commit 5de21bb9 ("ACPI / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the ACPI core"), all occurrences of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME were replaced with CONFIG_PM. This created the following structure of #ifdef blocks in the code: [...] #ifdef CONFIG_PM #ifdef CONFIG_PM /* always on / undead */ #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP [...] #endif #endif [...] #endif This patch removes the inner "#ifdef CONFIG_PM" block as it will always be enabled when the outer block is enabled. This inconsistency was found using the undertaker-checkpatch tool. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Ruprecht <rupran@einserver.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If an ACPI device object whose _STA returns 0 (not present and not functional) has _PR0 or _PS0, its power_manageable flag will be set and acpi_bus_init_power() will return 0 for it. Consequently, if such a device object is passed to the ACPI device PM functions, they will attempt to carry out the requested operation on the device, although they should not do that for devices that are not present. To fix that problem make acpi_bus_init_power() return an error code for devices that are not present which will cause power_manageable to be cleared for them as appropriate in acpi_bus_get_power_flags(). However, the lists of power resources should not be freed for the device in that case, so modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to keep those lists even if acpi_bus_init_power() returns an error. Accordingly, when deciding whether or not the lists of power resources need to be freed, acpi_free_power_resources_lists() should check the power.flags.power_resources flag instead of flags.power_manageable, so make that change too. Furthermore, if acpi_bus_attach() sees that flags.initialized is unset for the given device, it should reset the power management settings of the device and re-initialize them from scratch instead of relying on the previous settings (the device may have appeared after being not present previously, for example), so make it use the 'valid' flag of the D0 power state as the initial value of flags.power_manageable for it and call acpi_bus_init_power() to discover its current power state. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
-
- 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In some cases acpi_device_wakeup() may be called to ensure wakeup power to be off for a given device even though that device's wakeup GPE has not been enabled so far. It calls acpi_disable_gpe() on a GPE that's not enabled and this causes ACPICA to return the AE_LIMIT status code from that call which then is reported as an error by the ACPICA's debug facilities (if enabled). This may lead to a fair amount of confusion, so introduce a new ACPI device wakeup flag to store the wakeup GPE status and avoid disabling wakeup GPEs that have not been enabled. Reported-and-tested-by: NVenkat Raghavulu <venkat.raghavulu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit b2b49ccb (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few depend on CONFIG_PM. Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the ACPI core code. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Rui 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHuang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
As reported by Dmitry, on some Chromebooks there are devices with corresponding ACPI objects and with unusual system wakeup configuration. Namely, they technically are wakeup-capable, but the wakeup is handled via a platform-specific out-of-band mechanism and the ACPI PM layer has no information on the wakeup capability. As a result, device_may_wakeup(dev) called from acpi_dev_suspend_late() returns 'true' for those devices, but the wakeup.flags.valid flag is unset for the corresponding ACPI device objects, so acpi_device_wakeup() reproducibly fails for them causing acpi_dev_suspend_late() to return an error code. The entire system suspend is then aborted and the machines in question cannot suspend at all. Address the problem by ignoring the device_may_wakeup(dev) return value in acpi_dev_suspend_late() if the ACPI companion of the device being handled has wakeup.flags.valid unset (in which case it is clear that the wakeup is supposed to be handled by other means). This fixes a regression introduced by commit a76e9bd8 (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain) as the affected systems could suspend and resume successfully before that commit. Fixes: a76e9bd8 (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain) Reported-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Fix a bug that invokes acpi_device_wakeup() with wrong parameters. Fixes: f35cec25 (ACPI / PM: Always enable wakeup GPEs when enabling device wakeup) Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: 3.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
When we have the acpi_device pointer, there is no need to pass the device's handle to the acpi_bus_xxx_power functions to get/set/update the device's power state, instead, use the acpi_device_xxx_power functions directly. To make this happen for fan module, export acpi_device_update_power. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
The ->detach() callback for the PM domain has now been fully adopted, thus there no users left of the acpi_dev_pm_detach() API. This allow us to convert it into a static function. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
As as preparation to simplify the detachment of devices from their PM domains, we assign the ->detach() callback to genpd_dev_pm_detach(). Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI_HANDLE() macro evaluates ACPI_COMPANION() internally to return the handle of the device's ACPI companion, so it is much more straightforward and efficient to use ACPI_COMPANION() directly to obtain the device's ACPI companion object instead of using ACPI_HANDLE() and acpi_bus_get_device() on the returned handle for the same thing. Do that in three places in the ACPI device PM code. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Wakeup GPEs are currently only enabled when setting up devices for remote wakeup at run time. During system-wide transitions they are enabled by ACPICA at the very last stage of suspend (before asking the BIOS to take over). Of course, that only works for system sleep states supported by ACPI, so in particular it doesn't work for the "freeze" sleep state. For this reason, modify the ACPI core device PM code to enable wakeup GPEs for devices when setting them up for wakeup regardless of whether that is remote wakeup at runtime or system wakeup. That allows the same device wakeup setup routine to be used for both runtime PM and system-wide PM and makes it possible to reduce code size quite a bit. This make ACPI-based PCI Wake-on-LAN work with the "freeze" sleep state on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500 and should help other systems too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue. This prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate, among other things. Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
No reason for excluding the remaining ones. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> [rjw: Rebased and exported the new acpi_subsys_complete() too.] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.) if that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Runtime-suspended devices are resumed during system suspend by acpi_subsys_prepare() for two reasons: First, because they may need to be reprogrammed in order to change their wakeup settings and, second, because they may need to be operatonal for their children to be successfully suspended. That is a problem, though, if there are many runtime-suspended devices that need to be resumed this way during system suspend, because the .prepare() PM callbacks of devices are executed sequentially and the times taken by them accumulate, which may increase the total system suspend time quite a bit. For this reason, move the resume of runtime-suspended devices up to the next phase of device suspend (during system suspend), except for the ones that have power.ignore_children set. The exception is made, because the devices with power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for their children to be successfully suspended (during system suspend) and they won't be resumed automatically as a result of the runtime resume of their children. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI device PM code in device_pm.c uses a special function, acpi_dev_pm_get_node(), to obtain an ACPI companion object of a given device. However, that is not necessary any more after recent changes that introduced the ACPI_COMPANION() macro serving exactly the same purpose, but working in a much more straightforward way. For this reason, drop acpi_dev_pm_get_node() and use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of it everywhere. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() is now literally identical to ACPI_HANDLE(), replace it with the latter everywhere and drop its definition from include/acpi.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it. Introduce two new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way, ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account. Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead. For some of them who used to pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET() introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an equivalent thing. The main motivation for doing this is that there are things represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the lack of valid ACPI handles). However, there are more reasons why it may be useful. First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node and the new macros. Second, the change should help to reduce (over time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device, because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly. Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit compiler directives to it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
-
- 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be dropped, so drop them. Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing entries from the power_dependent list in struct acpi_device, so drop that list too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Some serial buses like I2C and SPI don't require that the parent device is in D0 before any of its children transitions to D0, but instead the parent device can control its own power independently from the children. This does not follow the ACPI specification as it requires the parent to be powered on before its children. However, Windows seems to ignore this requirement so I think we can do the same in Linux. Implement this by adding a new power flag 'ignore_parent' to struct acpi_device. If this flag is set the ACPI core ignores checking of the parent device power state when the device is powered on/off. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
The state information can be useful to know what the problem is when an error message about a device can not being set to a higher power state than its parent appeared, so this patch adds such state information for both the target state of the device and the current state of its parent. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
Now that acpi_device_set_power() checks whether or not the given device is power manageable, it is not necessary to do this check in acpi_bus_set_power() any more, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify acpi_device_set_power() so that diagnostic messages printed by it to the kernel log always contain the name of the device concerned to make it possible to identify the device that triggered the message if need be. Also replace printk(KERN_WARNING ) with dev_warn() everywhere in that function. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make acpi_device_set_power() check if the given device is power manageable before checking if the given power state is valid for that device. Otherwise it will print that "Device does not support" that power state into the kernel log, which may not make sense for some power states (D0 and D3cold are supported by all devices by definition). Tested-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The role of acpi_bus_update_power() is to update the given ACPI device object's power.state field to reflect the current physical state of the device (as inferred from the configuration of power resources and _PSC, if available). For this purpose it calls acpi_device_set_power() that should update the power resources' reference counters and set power.state as appropriate. However, that doesn't work if the "new" state is D1, D2 or D3hot and the the current value of power.state means D3cold, because in that case acpi_device_set_power() will refuse to transition the device from D3cold to non-D0. To address this problem, make acpi_bus_update_power() call acpi_power_transition() directly to update the power resources' reference counters and only use acpi_device_set_power() to put the device into D0 if the current physical state of it cannot be determined. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 28 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit fa1675b5 (ACPI / PM: Rework and clean up acpi_dev_pm_get_state()) a NULL pointer dereference will take place if NULL is passed to acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() as the second argument. Fix that by avoiding to use the pointer that may be NULL until it's necessary to store a return value at the location pointed to by it (if not NULL). Reported-and-tested-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 7cd8407d (ACPI / PM: Do not execute _PS0 for devices without _PSC during initialization) introduced a regression on some systems with Intel Lynxpoint Low-Power Subsystem (LPSS) where some devices need to be powered up during initialization, but their device objects in the ACPI namespace have _PS0 and _PS3 only (without _PSC or power resources). To work around this problem, make the ACPI LPSS driver power up devices it knows about by using a new helper function acpi_device_fix_up_power() that does all of the necessary sanity checks and calls acpi_dev_pm_explicit_set() to put the device into D0. Reported-and-tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The acpi_dev_pm_get_state() function defined in device_pm.c is quite convoluted, which isn't really necessary, and it doesn't validate the values returned by the ACPI methods executed by it appropriately. To address these shortcomings modify it in the following way. (1) Make its return value only mean whether or not it succeeded and pass the device power states determined by it through pointers. (2) Drop the d_max_in argument, used by only one of its callers, from it, and move the code related to d_max_in into that caller, acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(). (3) Make it always check the return value of acpi_evaluate_integer() and handle failures as appropriate. Moreover, make it check if the values returned by the executed ACPI methods are not out of range. (4) Make it check if the values returned by the executed ACPI methods represent valid power states of the given device and handle situations in which that's not the case gracefully. Also update the kerneldoc comments of acpi_dev_pm_get_state() and acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to reflect the code changes. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-