Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 11月, 2022 8 次提交
  3. 02 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  5. 27 10月, 2022 2 次提交
  7. 08 10月, 2022 8 次提交
  9. 29 9月, 2022 2 次提交
  11. 21 9月, 2022 3 次提交
    • L
      KVM: x86/pmu: Update AMD PMC sample period to fix guest NMI-watchdog · 5898671f
      由 Like Xu 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.18
commit 75189d1d
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5RD6Y
CVE: NA

-------------

NMI-watchdog is one of the favorite features of kernel developers,
but it does not work in AMD guest even with vPMU enabled and worse,
the system misrepresents this capability via /proc.

This is a PMC emulation error. KVM does not pass the latest valid
value to perf_event in time when guest NMI-watchdog is running, thus
the perf_event corresponding to the watchdog counter will enter the
old state at some point after the first guest NMI injection, forcing
the hardware register PMC0 to be constantly written to 0x800000000001.

Meanwhile, the running counter should accurately reflect its new value
based on the latest coordinated pmc->counter (from vPMC's point of view)
rather than the value written directly by the guest.

Fixes: 168d918f ("KVM: x86: Adjust counter sample period after a wrmsr")
Reported-by: NDongli Cao <caodongli@kingsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NLike Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: NYanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NYanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220409015226.38619-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      5898671f
    • L
      KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce pmc->is_paused to reduce the call time of perf interfaces · e7815ebf
      由 Like Xu 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.14
commit e79f49c3
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5RD6Y
CVE: NA

-------------

Based on our observations, after any vm-exit associated with vPMU, there
are at least two or more perf interfaces to be called for guest counter
emulation, such as perf_event_{pause, read_value, period}(), and each one
will {lock, unlock} the same perf_event_ctx. The frequency of calls becomes
more severe when guest use counters in a multiplexed manner.

Holding a lock once and completing the KVM request operations in the perf
context would introduce a set of impractical new interfaces. So we can
further optimize the vPMU implementation by avoiding repeated calls to
these interfaces in the KVM context for at least one pattern:

After we call perf_event_pause() once, the event will be disabled and its
internal count will be reset to 0. So there is no need to pause it again
or read its value. Once the event is paused, event period will not be
updated until the next time it's resumed or reprogrammed. And there is
also no need to call perf_event_period twice for a non-running counter,
considering the perf_event for a running counter is never paused.

Based on this implementation, for the following common usage of
sampling 4 events using perf on a 4u8g guest:

  echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog
  echo 25 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent
  echo 10000 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
  echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent
  for i in `seq 1 1 10`
  do
  taskset -c 0 perf record \
  -e cpu-cycles -e instructions -e branch-instructions -e cache-misses \
  /root/br_instr a
  done

the average latency of the guest NMI handler is reduced from
37646.7 ns to 32929.3 ns (~1.14x speed up) on the Intel ICX server.
Also, in addition to collecting more samples, no loss of sampling
accuracy was observed compared to before the optimization.
Signed-off-by: NLike Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20210728120705.6855-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NKeqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      e7815ebf
    • D
      x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections · 30b1e4cb
      由 Daniel Sneddon 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.136
commit 509c2c9fe75ea7493eebbb6bb2f711f37530ae19
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5N1SO
CVE: CVE-2022-26373

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=509c2c9fe75ea7493eebbb6bb2f711f37530ae19

--------------------------------

commit 2b129932 upstream.

tl;dr: The Enhanced IBRS mitigation for Spectre v2 does not work as
documented for RET instructions after VM exits. Mitigate it with a new
one-entry RSB stuffing mechanism and a new LFENCE.

== Background ==

Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) was designed to help
mitigate Branch Target Injection and Speculative Store Bypass, i.e.
Spectre, attacks. IBRS prevents software run in less privileged modes
from affecting branch prediction in more privileged modes. IBRS requires
the MSR to be written on every privilege level change.

To overcome some of the performance issues of IBRS, Enhanced IBRS was
introduced.  eIBRS is an "always on" IBRS, in other words, just turn
it on once instead of writing the MSR on every privilege level change.
When eIBRS is enabled, more privileged modes should be protected from
less privileged modes, including protecting VMMs from guests.

== Problem ==

Here's a simplification of how guests are run on Linux' KVM:

void run_kvm_guest(void)
{
	// Prepare to run guest
	VMRESUME();
	// Clean up after guest runs
}

The execution flow for that would look something like this to the
processor:

1. Host-side: call run_kvm_guest()
2. Host-side: VMRESUME
3. Guest runs, does "CALL guest_function"
4. VM exit, host runs again
5. Host might make some "cleanup" function calls
6. Host-side: RET from run_kvm_guest()

Now, when back on the host, there are a couple of possible scenarios of
post-guest activity the host needs to do before executing host code:

* on pre-eIBRS hardware (legacy IBRS, or nothing at all), the RSB is not
touched and Linux has to do a 32-entry stuffing.

* on eIBRS hardware, VM exit with IBRS enabled, or restoring the host
IBRS=1 shortly after VM exit, has a documented side effect of flushing
the RSB except in this PBRSB situation where the software needs to stuff
the last RSB entry "by hand".

IOW, with eIBRS supported, host RET instructions should no longer be
influenced by guest behavior after the host retires a single CALL
instruction.

However, if the RET instructions are "unbalanced" with CALLs after a VM
exit as is the RET in #6, it might speculatively use the address for the
instruction after the CALL in #3 as an RSB prediction. This is a problem
since the (untrusted) guest controls this address.

Balanced CALL/RET instruction pairs such as in step #5 are not affected.

== Solution ==

The PBRSB issue affects a wide variety of Intel processors which
support eIBRS. But not all of them need mitigation. Today,
X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT triggers an RSB filling sequence that mitigates
PBRSB. Systems setting RSB_VMEXIT need no further mitigation - i.e.,
eIBRS systems which enable legacy IBRS explicitly.

However, such systems (X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) do not set RSB_VMEXIT
and most of them need a new mitigation.

Therefore, introduce a new feature flag X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE
which triggers a lighter-weight PBRSB mitigation versus RSB_VMEXIT.

The lighter-weight mitigation performs a CALL instruction which is
immediately followed by a speculative execution barrier (INT3). This
steers speculative execution to the barrier -- just like a retpoline
-- which ensures that speculation can never reach an unbalanced RET.
Then, ensure this CALL is retired before continuing execution with an
LFENCE.

In other words, the window of exposure is opened at VM exit where RET
behavior is troublesome. While the window is open, force RSB predictions
sampling for RET targets to a dead end at the INT3. Close the window
with the LFENCE.

There is a subset of eIBRS systems which are not vulnerable to PBRSB.
Add these systems to the cpu_vuln_whitelist[] as NO_EIBRS_PBRSB.
Future systems that aren't vulnerable will set ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO.

  [ bp: Massage, incorporate review comments from Andy Cooper. ]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NPawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

conflict:
    arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
Signed-off-by: NChen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      30b1e4cb
  13. 20 9月, 2022 16 次提交