- 05 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
An image sequence number is added to the UBI erase-counter header to be able determine if the root file system contains a mixture of old and new images (because the flashing failed to complete). A change to nolo is also needed for this to take effect. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Get rid of 'do_div()' and use more user-friendly primitives from 'linux/math64.h'. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederik Schwarzer 提交于
- (better, more, bigger ...) then -> (...) than Signed-off-by: NFrederik Schwarzer <schwarzerf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 06 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zoltan Sogor 提交于
'ubi_io_read_data()' may return EBADMSG in case of an ECC error, and we should not panic because of this. We have CRC32 checksum and may check the data. So just ignore the EBADMSG error. This patch also fixes a minor spelling error at the same time. Signed-off-by: NZoltan Sogor <weth@inf.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 27 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Brunel 提交于
In case of error, the function add_volume returns an ERR pointer. The result of IS_ERR, which is supposed to be used in a test as it is, is here checked to be less than zero, which seems odd. We suggest to replace this test by a simple IS_ERR test. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @def0@ expression x; position p0; @@ x@p0 = add_volume(...) @protected@ expression def0.x,E; position def0.p0; position p; statement S; @@ x@p0 ... when != x = E if (!IS_ERR(x) && ...) {<... x@p ...>} else S @unprotected@ expression def0.x,E; identifier fld; position def0.p0; position p != protected.p; @@ x@p0 ... when != x = E * x@p->fld // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulien Brunel <brunel@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Before UBI got into mainline, there was a slight flash format change - we did not have sequence number support, then added it. We have carried full support of those ancient images till this moment. Now the support is removed, well, not fully removed. Now UBI will support only _clean_ old images, which were cleanly detached last time (just before kernel upgrade). This is most likely the case. But we will not support unclean ancient images. Surprisingly, this allows us to remove a big chunk of legacy code. And the same should be true for downgrading: clean images should downgrade fine, but unclean ones will not. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
No functional changes, just tweak comments to make kernel-doc work fine and stop complaining. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Just out or curiousity ran checkpatch.pl for whole UBI, and discovered there are quite a few of stylistic issues. Fix them. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Hch asked not to use "unit" for sub-systems, let it be so. Also some other commentaries modifications. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
(a + b) / (c + d) != a / c + b / d. The old code errornously assumed this incorrect formuld. Instead, just sum all erase counters in a 64-bit variable and divide to the number of EBs at the end. Thanks to Adrian Hunter for pointing this out. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c: In function 'ubi_scan': drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c:772: warning: 'ec' may be used uninitialized in this function Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 25 1月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Add more information about layout volume to make userspace tools use the macros instead of constants. Also rename UBI_LAYOUT_VOL_ID to make it consistent with other macros. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Old gcc complains: CC drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.o drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c: In function 'wear_leveling_worker': drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c:746: warning: 'pe' may be used uninitialized in this function CC drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.o drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c: In function 'ubi_scan': drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c:772: warning: 'ec' may be used uninitialized in this function drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c:772: note: 'ec' was declared here Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 14 10月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Similar reason as in case of the previous patch: it causes deadlocks if a filesystem with writeback support works on top of UBI. So pre-allocate needed buffers when attaching MTD device. We also need mutexes to protect the buffers, but they do not cause much contantion because they are used in recovery, torture, and WL copy routines, which are called seldom. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Use GFP_NOFS flag when allocating memory on I/O path, because otherwise we may deadlock the filesystem which works on top of us. We observed the deadlocks with UBIFS. Example: VFS->FS lock a lock->UBI->kmalloc()->VFS writeback->FS locks the same lock again. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Fix "symbol shadows an earlier one" warnings. Although they are harmless but it does not hurt to fix them and make sparse happy. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Florin Malita 提交于
Coverity (1769) found the following problem: if the erase counter overflow check triggers, ec_hdr is leaked. Moving the allocation after the overflow check should take care of it. Signed-off-by: NFlorin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 01 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mariusz Kozlowski 提交于
To be able to convert kmalloc + memset(..., 1, ...) to kzalloc this patch reverses the logic around 'buf'. Signed-off-by: NMariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 8 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Do not zero max_sqnum after a new volume has been found. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Brijesh Singh 提交于
Hi,I came across problem of having two leb with same sequence no.This happens when we continuously write one block again and again and reboot machine before background thread erases those blocks. The problem here was,when we find two blocks with same sequence no,we take the higher one,but we were not updating max seq no,so next block may have the same seqnum. This patch solves this problem. Signed-off-by: NBrijesh Singh <brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Kill UBI's homegrown endianess handling and replace it with the standard kernel endianess handling. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
UBI allocates temporary buffers of PEB size, which may be 256KiB. Use vmalloc instead of kmalloc for such big temporary buffers. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Add few comments above ubi_scan_add_used() to explain why it is so complex. Requested by Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
In case of static volumes, make emulated MTD device size to be equivalent to data size, rather then volume size. Reported-by: NJohn Smith <john@arrows.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
There were several bugs in volume table creation error path. Thanks to Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> and Florin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com> for finding and analysing them: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/3/274 This patch makes ubi_scan_add_to_list() static and renames it to add_to_list(), just because it is not needed outside scan.c anymore. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Reported-by: NEric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <snakebyte@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 27 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem B. Bityutskiy 提交于
UBI (Latin: "where?") manages multiple logical volumes on a single flash device, specifically supporting NAND flash devices. UBI provides a flexible partitioning concept which still allows for wear-levelling across the whole flash device. In a sense, UBI may be compared to the Logical Volume Manager (LVM). Whereas LVM maps logical sector numbers to physical HDD sector numbers, UBI maps logical eraseblocks to physical eraseblocks. More information may be found at http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html Partitioning/Re-partitioning An UBI volume occupies a certain number of erase blocks. This is limited by a configured maximum volume size, which could also be viewed as the partition size. Each individual UBI volume's size can be changed independently of the other UBI volumes, provided that the sum of all volume sizes doesn't exceed a certain limit. UBI supports dynamic volumes and static volumes. Static volumes are read-only and their contents are protected by CRC check sums. Bad eraseblocks handling UBI transparently handles bad eraseblocks. When a physical eraseblock becomes bad, it is substituted by a good physical eraseblock, and the user does not even notice this. Scrubbing On a NAND flash bit flips can occur on any write operation, sometimes also on read. If bit flips persist on the device, at first they can still be corrected by ECC, but once they accumulate, correction will become impossible. Thus it is best to actively scrub the affected eraseblock, by first copying it to a free eraseblock and then erasing the original. The UBI layer performs this type of scrubbing under the covers, transparently to the UBI volume users. Erase Counts UBI maintains an erase count header per eraseblock. This frees higher-level layers (like file systems) from doing this and allows for centralized erase count management instead. The erase counts are used by the wear-levelling algorithm in the UBI layer. The algorithm itself is exchangeable. Booting from NAND For booting directly from NAND flash the hardware must at least be capable of fetching and executing a small portion of the NAND flash. Some NAND flash controllers have this kind of support. They usually limit the window to a few kilobytes in erase block 0. This "initial program loader" (IPL) must then contain sufficient logic to load and execute the next boot phase. Due to bad eraseblocks, which may be randomly scattered over the flash device, it is problematic to store the "secondary program loader" (SPL) statically. Also, due to bit-flips it may become corrupted over time. UBI allows to solve this problem gracefully by storing the SPL in a small static UBI volume. UBI volumes vs. static partitions UBI volumes are still very similar to static MTD partitions: * both consist of eraseblocks (logical eraseblocks in case of UBI volumes, and physical eraseblocks in case of static partitions; * both support three basic operations - read, write, erase. But UBI volumes have the following advantages over traditional static MTD partitions: * there are no eraseblock wear-leveling constraints in case of UBI volumes, so the user should not care about this; * there are no bit-flips and bad eraseblocks in case of UBI volumes. So, UBI volumes may be considered as flash devices with relaxed restrictions. Where can it be found? Documentation, kernel code and applications can be found in the MTD gits. What are the applications for? The applications help to create binary flash images for two purposes: pfi files (partial flash images) for in-system update of UBI volumes, and plain binary images, with or without OOB data in case of NAND, for a manufacturing step. Furthermore some tools are/and will be created that allow flash content analysis after a system has crashed.. Who did UBI? The original ideas, where UBI is based on, were developed by Andreas Arnez, Frank Haverkamp and Thomas Gleixner. Josh W. Boyer and some others were involved too. The implementation of the kernel layer was done by Artem B. Bityutskiy. The user-space applications and tools were written by Oliver Lohmann with contributions from Frank Haverkamp, Andreas Arnez, and Artem. Joern Engel contributed a patch which modifies JFFS2 so that it can be run on a UBI volume. Thomas Gleixner did modifications to the NAND layer. Alexander Schmidt made some testing work as well as core functionality improvements. Signed-off-by: NArtem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NFrank Haverkamp <haver@vnet.ibm.com>
-