- 20 5月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lang Cheng 提交于
The old version of ib_umem_get() need these udata as a parameter but now they are unnecessary. Fixes: c320e527 ("IB: Allow calls to ib_umem_get from kernel ULPs") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1620807142-39157-4-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NLang Cheng <chenglang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWeihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com> Acked-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maor Gottlieb 提交于
MEMIC buffer, in addition to regular read and write operations, can support atomic operations from the host. Introduce and implement new UAPI to allocate address space for MEMIC operations such as atomic. This includes: 1. Expose new IOCTL for request mapping of MEMIC operation. 2. Hold the operations address in a list, so same operation to same DM will be allocated only once. 3. Manage refcount on the mlx5_ib_dm object, so it would be keep valid until all addresses were unmapped. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210411122924.60230-7-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Maor Gottlieb 提交于
Move all device memory related code to a separate file. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210411122924.60230-4-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Shay Drory 提交于
Currently, ODP caps are set during the init stage of mlx5_ib_dev, regardless of whether the device profile supports ODP or not. There is no point in setting ODP caps if the device profile doesn't support ODP. Hence, move setting the ODP caps to the odp_init stage. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318135259.681264-1-leon@kernel.orgReviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NShay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Mark Bloch 提交于
Current code uses many different types when dealing with a port of a RDMA device: u8, unsigned int and u32. Switch to u32 to clean up the logic. This allows us to make (at least) the core view consistent and use the same type. Unfortunately not all places can be converted. Many uverbs functions expect port to be u8 so keep those places in order not to break UAPIs. HW/Spec defined values must also not be changed. With the switch to u32 we now can support devices with more than 255 ports. U32_MAX is reserved to make control logic a bit easier to deal with. As a device with U32_MAX ports probably isn't going to happen any time soon this seems like a non issue. When a device with more than 255 ports is created uverbs will report the RDMA device as having 255 ports as this is the max currently supported. The verbs interface is not changed yet because the IBTA spec limits the port size in too many places to be u8 and all applications that relies in verbs won't be able to cope with this change. At this stage, we are extending the interfaces that are using vendor channel solely Once the limitation is lifted mlx5 in switchdev mode will be able to have thousands of SFs created by the device. As the only instance of an RDMA device that reports more than 255 ports will be a representor device and it exposes itself as a RAW Ethernet only device CM/MAD/IPoIB and other ULPs aren't effected by this change and their sysfs/interfaces that are exposes to userspace can remain unchanged. While here cleanup some alignment issues and remove unneeded sanity checks (mainly in rdmavt), Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301070420.439400-1-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shay Drory 提交于
There is no need to create the ODP EQ if the user doesn't use ODP MRs. Hence, create it only when the first ODP MR is created. This EQ will be destroyed only when the device is unloaded. This will decrease the number of EQs created per device. for example: If we creates 1K devices (SF/VF/etc'), than we will decrease the num of EQs by 1K. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210314125418.179716-1-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NShay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Now that the SRCU stuff has been removed the entire MR destroy logic can be made a lot simpler. Currently there are many different ways to destroy a MR and it makes it really hard to do this task correctly. Route all destruction through mlx5_ib_dereg_mr() and make it work for all situations. Since it turns out all the different MR types do basically the same thing this removes a lot of knowledge of MR internals from ODP and leaves ODP just exporting an operation to clean up children. This fixes a few weird corner cases bugs and firmly uses the correct ordering of the MR destruction: - Stop parallel access to the mkey via the ODP xarray - Stop DMA - Release the umem - Clean up ODP children - Free/Recycle the MR Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304120745.1090751-4-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
The struct mlx5_ib_mr can be used for three different things, but only one at a time: - In the user MR cache - As a kernel MR - As a user MR Overlay the three things into a single union with the following rules: - If the mr is found on the cache_ent->head list then it is a cache MR and umem == NULL. The entire union is zero after the MR is removed from the cache. - If umem != NULL or type == IB_MR_TYPE_USER then it is a user MR. - If umem == NULL then it is a kernel MR This reduces the size of struct mlx5_ib_mr to 552 bytes from 702. The only place the three flows overlap in the code is during dereg, so add a few extra checks along there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304120745.1090751-3-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
All of the ODP code assumes when it calls mlx5_mr_cache_alloc() the ODP related fields are zero'd. This is true if the MR was just allocated, but if the MR is recycled through the cache then the values are never zero'd. This causes a bug in the odp_stats, they don't reset when the MR is reallocated, also is_odp_implicit is never 0'd. So we can use memset on a block of the mlx5_ib_mr reorganize the structure to put all the data that can be zero'd by the cache at the end. It is organized as an anonymous struct because the next patch will make this a union. Delete the unused smr_info. Don't set the kernel only desc_size on the user path. No longer any need to zero mr->parent before freeing it, the memset() will get it now. Fixes: a3de94e3 ("IB/mlx5: Introduce ODP diagnostic counters") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304120745.1090751-2-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yishai Hadas 提交于
Cleanup the synchronize_srcu() from the ODP flow as it was found to be a very heavy time consumer as part of dereg_mr. For example de-registration of 10000 ODP MRs each with size of 2M hugepage took 19.6 sec comparing de-registration of same number of non ODP MRs that took 172 ms. The new locking scheme uses the wait_event() mechanism which follows the use count of the MR instead of using synchronize_srcu(). By that change, the time required for the above test took 95 ms which is even better than the non ODP flow. Once fully dropped the srcu usage, had to come with a lock to protect the XA access. As part of using the above mechanism we could also clean the num_deferred_work stuff and follow the use count instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210202071309.2057998-1-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NYishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Parav Pandit 提交于
Instead of open coding the loop for port iteration, use rdma_for_each_port macro provided by core. To use such macro, early initialization of phys_port_cnt is needed. Hence, initialize such constant early enough in the init stage. Whichever functions are called with port using rdma_for_each_port(), convert their port type from u8 to unsigned int to match the core API. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210203130133.4057329-6-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Parav Pandit 提交于
Currently mlx5 driver caches port GID table length for 2 ports. It is also cached by IB core as port immutable data. When mlx5 representor ports are present, which are usually more than 2, invalid access to port_caps array can happen while validating the GID table length which is only for 2 ports. To avoid this, take help of the IB cores port immutable data by exposing an API to read the port immutable fields. Remove mlx5 driver's internal cache, thereby reduce code and data. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210203130133.4057329-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Parav Pandit 提交于
Pkey table length for all the ports of the device is the same. Currently get_ports_cap() reads and stores it for each port by querying the device which reads more than just pkey table length. For representor device ports which can be in range of hundreds, it queries is for each such port and end up returning same value for all the ports. When in representor mode, modify QP accesses pkey port caps for a port index that can be outside of the port_caps table. Hence, simplify the logic to query the max pkey table length only once during device initialization sequence. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210203130133.4057329-3-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Parav Pandit 提交于
mlx5_port_caps are RDMA specific capabilities. These are not used by the mlx5_core_device at all. Move them to mlx5_ib_dev where it is used and reduce the scope of it to multiple drivers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210203130133.4057329-2-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 21 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jianxin Xiong 提交于
Implement the new driver method 'reg_user_mr_dmabuf'. Utilize the core functions to import dma-buf based memory region and update the mappings. Add code to handle dma-buf related page fault. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1608067636-98073-5-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.comSigned-off-by: NJianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com> Acked-by: NMichael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Acked-by: NChristian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Parav Pandit 提交于
mlx5_query_mad_ifc_smp_attr_node_info() is internal to mad.c Hence, make it static. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210113121703.559778-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 Maor Gottlieb 提交于
Currently, DM MR registration flow doesn't set the mlx5_ib_dev pointer and can cause a NULL pointer dereference if userspace dumps the MR via rdma tool. Assign the IB device together with the other fields and remove the redundant reference of mlx5_ib_dev from mlx5_ib_mr. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6c29f57e ("IB/mlx5: Device memory mr registration support") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203190807.127189-1-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This function handles an ODP and regular MR flow all mushed together, even though the two flows are quite different. Split them into two dedicated functions. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130075839.278575-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
mlx5 has an ugly flow where it tries to allocate a new MR and replace the existing MR in the same memory during rereg. This is very complicated and buggy. Instead of trying to replace in-place inside the driver, provide support from uverbs to change the entire HW object assigned to a handle during rereg_mr. Since destroying a MR is allowed to fail (ie if a MW is pointing at it) and can't be detected in advance, the algorithm creates a completely new uobject to hold the new MR and swaps the IDR entries of the two objects. The old MR in the temporary IDR entry is destroyed, and if it fails rereg_mr succeeds and destruction is deferred to FD release. This complexity is why this cannot live in a driver safely. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130075839.278575-4-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
The conversion to auxiliary bus solves long standing issue with existing mlx5_ib<->mlx5_core coupling. It required to have both modules in initramfs if one of them needed for the boot. Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2020 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Since devx uses the new rdma_for_each_block() to fill the PAS it can also use ib_umem_find_best_pgsz(). However, the umem constructionin devx is complicated, the umem must still respect all the HW limits such as page_offset_quantized and the IOVA alignment. Since we don't know what the user intends to use the umem for we have to limit it to PAGE_SIZE. There are users trying to mix umem's with mkeys so this makes them work reliably, at least for an identity IOVA, by ensuring the IOVA matches the selected page size. Last user of mlx5_ib_get_buf_offset() so it can also be removed. Fixes: aeae9457 ("IB/mlx5: Add DEVX support for memory registration") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201115114311.136250-7-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This fixes a bug where the page_offset was not being considered when building a CQ. The HW specification says it 'must be zero', so use a variant of mlx5_umem_find_best_quantized_pgoff() with a 0 pgoff_bitmask to force this result. Fixes: e126ba97 ("mlx5: Add driver for Mellanox Connect-IB adapters") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201115114311.136250-6-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Delete custom logic in the QP in favor of more general variant. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201115114311.136250-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
SRQ uses a quantized and scaled page_offset, which is another variation of ib_umem_find_best_pgsz(). Add mlx5_umem_find_best_quantized_pgoff() to perform this calculation for each mailbox. A macro shows how the calculation is directly connected to the mailbox format. This new routine replaces the limited mlx5_ib_cont_pages() and mlx5_ib_get_buf_offset() pairing which would reject valid configurations rather than adjust the page_size to make it work. In turn this is much more aggressive about choosing large page sizes for these objects and when THP is enabled it will now often find a single page solution. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201115114311.136250-2-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 03 11月, 2020 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Now that all the PAS arrays or UMR XLT's for mkcs are filled using rdma_for_each_block() we can use the common ib_umem_find_best_pgsz() algorithm. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026132314.1336717-6-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Mixing these together is just a mess, make a dedicated version, mlx5_ib_update_mr_pas(), which directly loads the whole MTT for a non-ODP MR. The split out version can trivially use a simple loop with rdma_for_each_block() which allows using the core code to compute the MR pages and avoids seeking in the SGL list after each chunk as the __mlx5_ib_populate_pas() call required. Significantly speeds loading large MTTs. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026132314.1336717-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
The memory allocation is quite complicated, and makes this function hard to understand. Refactor things so that a function call sets up the WR, SG, DMA mapping and buffer, further splitting that into buffer and DMA/wr. This also slightly changes the buffer allocation logic to try an order 0 page allocation (with OOM warnings on) before going to the emergency page. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026132314.1336717-4-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This is the only user, so remove the wrappers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026132314.1336717-3-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This routine converts the umem SGL into a list of fixed pages for DMA, which is exactly what rdma_umem_for_each_dma_block() is for, use the common code directly. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026132314.1336717-2-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Most callers don't need this, and the few that do can get it as ib_umem_num_pages(umem). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-8-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This is the same as ib_umem_num_dma_blocks(umem, 1UL << page_shift), have the callers compute it directly. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-7-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
Only alloc_mr_from_cache() needs order and can trivially compute it, so lift it to the one call site and remove the NULL arguments. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-6-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
For the user MR path, instead of calling this after getting the umem, call it as part of creating the struct mlx5_ib_mr and distill its output to a single page_shift stored inside the mr. This avoids passing around the tuple of its output. Based on the umem and page_shift, the output arguments can be computed using: count == ib_umem_num_pages(mr->umem) shift == mr->page_shift ncont == ib_umem_num_dma_blocks(mr->umem, 1 << mr->page_shift) order == order_base_2(ncont) And since mr->page_shift == umem_odp->page_shift then ncont == ib_umem_num_dma_blocks() == ib_umem_odp_num_pages() for ODP umems. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
This is the same value as ib_umem_num_pages(mr->umem), use that instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-4-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Jason Gunthorpe 提交于
The is only ever set to non-zero if the MR is from the cache, and if it is cached then the order is in cached_ent->order. Make it clearer that use_umr_mtt_update() only returns true for cached MRs and remove the redundant data. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026131936.1335664-2-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yishai Hadas 提交于
Sync device with CPU pages upon ODP MR registration. mlx5 already has to zero the HW's version of the PAS list, may as well deliver a PAS list that matches the current CPU page tables configuration. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930163828.1336747-5-leon@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NYishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2020 4 次提交
-
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
GSI QP doesn't need signal QP type because it is initialized statically to zero, which is IB_SIGNAL_ALL_WR also wr->send_flags isn't set too. This means that the GSI QP signal QP type can be removed. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926102450.2966017-5-leon@kernel.orgReviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
There is no reason to have separate create flow for the GSI QP, while general create_qp routine has all needed checks and ability to allocate and free the proper struct mlx5_ib_qp. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926102450.2966017-4-leon@kernel.orgReviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
Remove duplication of mlx5_ib_qp and mlx5_ib_gsi_qp fields. This change returns the memory footprint of mlx5_ib QP to be as it was before embedding GSI QP. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926102450.2966017-3-leon@kernel.orgReviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
The GSI QPs have different create flow from the regular QPs, but it is not really needed. Update the code to use mlx5_ib_qp as a storage class for all outside of GSI calls. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200926102450.2966017-2-leon@kernel.orgReviewed-by: NMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-