Introduce a new struct intel_pipe_wm which contains all the
watermarks for a single pipe. Use it to unify the LP0 and LP1+
watermark computations so that we can just iterate through the
watermark levels neatly and call ilk_compute_wm_level() for each.

Also add another tool ilk_wm_merge() that merges the LP1+ watermarks
from all pipes. For that, embed one intel_pipe_wm inside intel_crtc that
contains the currently valid watermarks for each pipe.

This is mainly preparatory work for pre-computing the watermarks for
each pipe and merging them at a later time. For now the merging still
happens immediately.

v2: Add some comments about level 0 DDB split and intel_wm_config
    Add WARN_ON for level 0 being disabled
    s/lp_wm/merged
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Follow-up to
commit 0aec2881
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 27 19:01:01 2013 +0300

    drm/dp: constify DP DPCD helpers
Requested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Gen2 doesn't have a hardware frame counter that can be read out. Just
provide a stub .get_vblank_counter() that always returns 0 instead of
trying to read non-existing registers.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Gen2 doesn't have the pixelcount register that gen3 and gen4 have.
Instead we must use the scanline counter like we do for ctg+.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The DSL register increments at the start of horizontal sync, so it
manages to miss the entire active portion of the current line.

Improve the get_scanoutpos accuracy a bit when the scanout position is
close to the start or end of vblank. We can do that by double checking
the DSL value against the vblank status bit from ISR.

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Tested-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The reported scanout position must be relative to the end of vblank.
Currently we manage to fumble that in a few ways.

First we don't consider the case when vtotal != vbl_end. While that
isn't very common (happens maybe only w/ old panel fitting hardware),
we can fix it easily enough.

The second issue is that on pre-CTG hardware we convert the pixel count
to horizontal/vertical components at the very beginning, and then forget
to adjust the horizontal component to be relative to vbl_end. So instead
we should keep our numbers in the pixel count domain while we're
adjusting the position to be relative to vbl_end. Then when we do the
conversion in the end, both vertical _and_ horizontal components will
come out correct.

v2: Change position to int from u32 to avoid sign issues

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Tested-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We have all the information we need in the mode structure, so going and
reading it from the hardware is pointless, and slower.

We never populated ->get_vblank_timestamp() in the UMS case, and as that
is the only way we'd ever call ->get_scanout_position(), we can
completely ignore UMS in i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos().

Also reorganize intel_irq_init() a bit to clarify the KMS vs. UMS
situation.

v2: Drop UMS code

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Tested-by: mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Avoid some code duplication.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Rounding down when calculating the dot/vco frequencies doesn't make much
sense. Round to closest should give slightly nicer answers.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At the moment we have 3 paths that lead to actually_set_backlight(),
from modesetting, ACPI/OpRegion requests and our very own
intel_backlight interface, and we have no way of distinguishing them in
the debug log. So add a debug breadcrumb to explain the source of the
backlight changes.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The old style frame counter increments at the start of active video.
However for i915_get_vblank_counter() we want a counter that increments
at the start of vblank.

Fortunately the low frame counter register also contains the pixel
counter for the current frame. We can can compare that against the
vblank start pixel count to determine if we need to increment the
frame counter by 1 to get the correct answer.

Also reorganize the function pointer assignments in intel_irq_init() a
bit to avoid confusing people.

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This file is all about the legacy fbdev support. If we want to extract
framebuffer functions, we better put those into a separate file.

Also rename functions accordingly, only two have used the intel_fb_
prefix anyway.
Reviewed-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Boots Just Fine (tm)!

The only glitch seems to be that at least on Fedora the boot splash
gets confused and doesn't display much at all.

And since there's no ugly console flickering anymore in between, the
flicker while switching between X servers (VT support is still enabled)
is even more jarring.

Also, I'm unsure whether we don't need to somehow kick out vgacon, now
that nothing else gets in the way. But stuff seems to work, so I
don't care. Also everything still works as well with VGA_CONSOLE=n

Also the #ifdef mess needs a bit of a cleanup, follow-up patches will
do just that.

To keep the Kconfig tidy, extract all the i915 options into its own
file.

v2:
- Rebase on top of the preliminary hw support option and the
  intel_drv.h cleanup.
- Shut up warnings in i915_debugfs.c

v3: Use the right CONFIG variable, spotted by Chon Ming.

Cc: Lee, Chon Ming <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For drivers which might want to disable fbdev legacy support.

Select the new option in all drivers for now, so this shouldn't result
in any change. Drivers need some work anyway to make fbdev support
optional (if they have it implemented, that is), so the recommended
way to expose this is by adding per-driver options. At least as long
as most drivers don't support disabling the fbdev support.

v2: Update for new drm drivers msm and rcar-du. Note that Rob's msm
driver can already take advantage of this, which allows us to build
msm without any fbdev depencies in the kernel!

v3: Move the MODULE_* stuff from the fbdev helper file to
drm_crtc_helper.c.

Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Reviewed-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Supposedly VLV uses the CTG+ style frame counter registers instead of
the old gen3/4 style. Add the magic offset to the correct registers.

We should already be taking the correct codepaths for
.get_vblank_counter() and .get_scanout_position().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

So digging out the right ones is a little easier.
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On gen7+, CACHE_MODE_0 moved, so we're clobbering some other reg rather
than restoring CACHE_MODE_0.  Don't do that.
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The current pre-gen4 pipe off code might break out of the loop
due to the timeout, but then the fail to print the warning.

Refactor the code a bit to use wait_for() to avoid the problem,
and that we also re-check the condition after the timeout has
expired.

v2: Use wait_for()
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The spec says the default timeout should be 2ms, but on my machine
this doesn't seem to be enough. Sometimes it works, sometimes I get
these messages when booting:
  - SWSCI request timed out
  - SWSCI request already in progress

And my guess is that the "already in progress" message is because the
first one is still happening.

I did some experiments on my machine (that has CONFIG_HZ=1000) and the
wait_for function usually takes 4-6 jiffies to finish, but I've seen
up to 9. So increase the timeout to 50ms. We only expect to wait for
the actual amount of time the operation takes, so even a huge timeout
shouldn't delay us more than what the hardware actually requires.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As we delay the initial RPS enabling (upon boot and after resume), there
is a chance that we may start to render and trigger RPS boosts before we
set up the punit. Any changes we make could result in inconsistent
hardware state, with a danger of causing undefined behaviour. However,
as the boosting is a optional tweak to RPS, we can simply ignore it
whilst RPS is not yet enabled.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Educate the users why i915 won't load on gen6+ and nomodeset.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61671Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Untangling me-too reports that actually aren't is really messy. And we
need to make sure the blame is put where it should be right from the
start ;-)

v2: Improve the wording from Ben's suggestions.

Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Acked-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Frob the message as suggested by Paulo on irc.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Enabling rps (turbo setup) was put in a work queue because it may
take quite awhile.  This change flushes the work queue to initialize
rps values before use by sysfs or debugfs.  Specifically,
rps.delayed_resume_work is flushed before using rps.hw_max,
rps.max_delay, rps.min_delay, or rps.cur_delay.

This change fixes a problem in sysfs where show functions using
uninitialized values show incorrect values and store functions
using uninitialized values in range checks incorrectly fail to
store valid input values.  This change also addresses similar use
before initialized problems in debugfs.
Signed-off-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We lost the ability to capture the first error for a stuck ring in the
recent hangcheck robustification. Whilst both error states are
interesting (why does the GPU not recover is also essential to debug),
our primary goal is to fix the initial hang and so we need to capture
the first error state upon taking hangcheck action.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Let's try to avoid these confusing negated booleans.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Make sure our primary_disabled matches our expectations after driver
init.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70270Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Nshui yangwei <yangweix.shui@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Regression introduced by:
    commit 311a2094
    Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
        drm/i915: don't init DP or HDMI when not supported by DDI port

Since the commit above it is possible to have a DDI encoder that has
the HDMI connector but not the DP connector (in case the port doesn't
support DP). In this case, we must properly free the DP connector.

We just leak this once, so it's not a big deal.

Reported by kmemleak.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The DP spec allows this, and requires it when full link training is
started with non-minimum voltage swing and/or non-zero pre-emphasis.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For future platforms we'll need to initialize our MMIO function pointers
even earlier. Specifically, we'll need to be able to have register
reads/writes at GTT initialization (in i915_gem_gtt_init). Similarly,
these platforms also have MMIO differences based on the PCH id, so
while moving stuff around, also move the PCH initialization.

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Mention the function where we need register access.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At the end of haswell_crtc_enable we have an intel_wait_for_vblank
with a big comment, and the message suggests it's a workaround for
something we don't really understand. So I removed that wait and
started getting HW state readout error messages saying that the IPS
state is not what we expected.

I investigated and concluded that after you write IPS_ENABLE to
IPS_CTL, the bit will only actually become 1 on the next vblank. So
add code to wait for the IPS_ENABLE bit. We don't really need this
wait right now due to the wait I already mentioned, but at least this
one has a reason to be there, while the other one is just to
workaround some problem: we may remove it in the future.

The wait also acts as a POSTING_READ which we missed.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Something already got misplaced (although it's from a patch from
before Paulo's cleanup). Move it to the right spot.

v2: Remove the line to keep a neat block, requested by Paulo.
Reported-by: NPaulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now that MMIO has been split up into gen specific functions it is
obvious when HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED, HAS_FORCE_WAKE are needed. As such,
we can remove this extraneous condition.

As a result of this, as well as previously existing function pointers
for forcewake, we no longer need the has_force_wake member in the device
specific data structure.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Similar to the previous patch which implemented GEN specific reads; this
patch does the same for writes. Writes have a bit of adding complexity
due to the FPGA_DBG feature of HSW plus:

gen[2-4]: nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write
gen[6-7]: forcewake shenanigans
gen[HSW}: forcewake shenanigans + FPGA_DBG

I was a bit torn about whether or not to combine 6-HSW as one function,
since the FPGA_DBG is cleanly separated, and it wouldn't make the 6-7
MMIO too messy. In the end, I chose the clearest possible solution which
splits out HSW.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Extracting the MMIO read functionality makes per gen handling a bit
simpler, and the overall function a lot easier to read. The increasing
complexity of reads doesn't get too bad as the generation number
increases:

gen[2-4]: Nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write workaround
gen6+: forcewake shenanigans
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Just to make the churn and code duplication in upcoming patches a bit
less, turn code which is common to all GEN MMIO functions into a macro.

v2: Fix typo in subject
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In preparation for having per GEN MMIO functions, create, and start
using MMIO functions in our uncore data structure. This simply makes the
transition easier by allowing us to just plug in the per GEN stuff
later.

For simplicity, I moved the intel_uncore_init() function down since
those rely on static functions defined lower in the file. This is most
of the churn in this patch.

I made one unrelated change here by using off_t datatype for the offset
of the register to write. I like the clarity that this brings to the
code. If I did it as a separate patch, I am pretty certain it would get
bikeshedded to oblivion.
Requested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In order to be able to have virtual functions for the MMIO, we need to
use the raw access function. To keep things simple, just move this to
our early_sanitize code in uncore.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For upcoming patches which will have GEN specific MMIO functions, we'll
need to initialize the uncore data structure earlier than we do today.

If we do not do this, the following will be problematic:

intel_uncore_sanitize
	intel_disable_gt_powersave
		gen6_disable_rps
			I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0); <--- MMIO
intel_uncore_init // initializes MMIO

By initializing the function pointers first, we should be safe.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At least on my i830M here it reliably results in hard system hangs
nowadays. This is much worse than falling back to software rendering,
so I think we should simply rip this out.

After all we don't have any gpu reset for gen3 either, and there are a
lot more of those still around.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In truly crazy circumstances shmem might give us the wrong type of
page. So be a bit paranoid and double check this.

Reviewer: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/11/238Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>