1. 06 12月, 2016 3 次提交
  2. 30 11月, 2016 3 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: abort transaction if fill_holes() fails · f94480bd
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      At this point we will have dropped extent entries from the file, so if we fail
      to insert the new hole entries then we are leaving the fs in a corrupt state
      (albeit an easily fixed one).  Abort the transaciton if this happens so we can
      avoid corrupting the fs.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f94480bd
    • J
      Btrfs: fix file extent corruption · 62fe51c1
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      In order to do hole punching we have a block reserve to hold the reservation we
      need to drop the extents in our range.  Since we could end up dropping a lot of
      extents we set rsv->failfast so we can just loop around again and drop the
      remaining of the range.  Unfortunately we unconditionally fill the hole extents
      in and start from the last extent we encountered, which we may or may not have
      dropped.  So this can result in overlapping file extent entries, which can be
      tripped over in a variety of ways, either by hitting BUG_ON(!ret) in
      fill_holes() after the search, or in btrfs_set_item_key_safe() in
      btrfs_drop_extent() at a later time by an unrelated task.  Fix this by only
      setting drop_end to the last extent we did actually drop.  This way our holes
      are filled in properly for the range that we did drop, and the rest of the range
      that remains to be dropped is actually dropped.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      62fe51c1
    • D
      btrfs: remove unused headers, statfs.h · 926b9233
      David Sterba 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      926b9233
  3. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 26 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 16 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 25 8月, 2016 2 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix lockdep warning on deadlock against an inode's log mutex · 28a23593
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Commit 44f714da ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new
      inode after rename/unlink"), which landed in 4.8-rc2, introduced a
      possibility for a deadlock due to double locking of an inode's log mutex
      by the same task, which lockdep reports with:
      
      [23045.433975] =============================================
      [23045.434748] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
      [23045.435426] 4.7.0-rc6-btrfs-next-34+ #1 Not tainted
      [23045.436044] ---------------------------------------------
      [23045.436044] xfs_io/3688 is trying to acquire lock:
      [23045.436044]  (&ei->log_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa038552d>] btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]
                     but task is already holding lock:
      [23045.436044]  (&ei->log_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa038552d>] btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]
                     other info that might help us debug this:
      [23045.436044]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [23045.436044]        CPU0
      [23045.436044]        ----
      [23045.436044]   lock(&ei->log_mutex);
      [23045.436044]   lock(&ei->log_mutex);
      [23045.436044]
                      *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      [23045.436044]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      
      [23045.436044] 3 locks held by xfs_io/3688:
      [23045.436044]  #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa035f2ae>] btrfs_sync_file+0x14e/0x425 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  #1:  (sb_internal#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8118446b>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [23045.436044]  #2:  (&ei->log_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa038552d>] btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]
                     stack backtrace:
      [23045.436044] CPU: 4 PID: 3688 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 4.7.0-rc6-btrfs-next-34+ #1
      [23045.436044] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [23045.436044]  0000000000000000 ffff88022f5f7860 ffffffff8127074d ffffffff82a54b70
      [23045.436044]  ffffffff82a54b70 ffff88022f5f7920 ffffffff81092897 ffff880228015d68
      [23045.436044]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82a54b70 ffffffff829c3f00 ffff880228015d68
      [23045.436044] Call Trace:
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff8127074d>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff81092897>] __lock_acquire+0xcbb/0xe4e
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff8109155f>] ? mark_lock+0x24/0x201
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff8109179a>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5e/0x74
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff81092de0>] lock_acquire+0x12f/0x1c3
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff81092de0>] ? lock_acquire+0x12f/0x1c3
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa038552d>] ? btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa038552d>] ? btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff814a51a4>] mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x3a7
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa038552d>] ? btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa039705e>] ? btrfs_release_delayed_node+0xb/0xd [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa038552d>] btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa038552d>] ? btrfs_log_inode+0x13a/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff810a0ed1>] ? vprintk_emit+0x453/0x465
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa0385a61>] btrfs_log_inode+0x66e/0xc95 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa03c084d>] log_new_dir_dentries+0x26c/0x359 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa03865aa>] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x4a6/0x628 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa0387552>] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x5a/0x75 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffffa035f464>] btrfs_sync_file+0x304/0x425 [btrfs]
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff811acaf4>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8c/0x9e
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff811acb22>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff811acc79>] do_fsync+0x31/0x4a
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff811ace99>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff814a88e5>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
      [23045.436044]  [<ffffffff8108f039>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa
      
      An example reproducer for this is:
      
         $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
         $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
         $ mkdir /mnt/dir
         $ touch /mnt/dir/foo
         $ sync
         $ mv /mnt/dir/foo /mnt/dir/bar
         $ touch /mnt/dir/foo
         $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/dir/bar
      
      This is because while logging the inode of file bar we end up logging its
      parent directory (since its inode has an unlink_trans field matching the
      current transaction id due to the rename operation), which in turn logs
      the inodes for all its new dentries, so that the new inode for the new
      file named foo gets logged which in turn triggered another logging attempt
      for the inode we are fsync'ing, since that inode had an old name that
      corresponds to the name of the new inode.
      
      So fix this by ensuring that when logging the inode for a new dentry that
      has a name matching an old name of some other inode, we don't log again
      the original inode that we are fsync'ing.
      
      Fixes: 44f714da ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new inode after rename/unlink")
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      28a23593
    • W
      btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely · 18513091
      Wang Xiaoguang 提交于
      This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
      reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
      	#!/bin/bash
      	dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
      	dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
      	mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
      	mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
      	mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
      	cd /tmp/mntpoint
      	xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
      
      Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
      space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
      btrfs_fallocate()
      |-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
      |   bytes_may_use += 64M
      |-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
          |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
              |-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
              |   alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
              |   change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
              |   bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
              |   than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
              |   Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
              |   end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
      
      Here is another simple case for buffered write:
                          CPU 1              |              CPU 2
                                             |
      |-> cow_file_range()                   |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
          |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()         |   |
          |                                  |   |
          |                                  |   |
          |    .....                         |   |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
          |                                  |
          |                                  |
          |-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
      
      In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
      btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
      operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
      Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
      btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
      If
      	100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
      		data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
      		data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
      btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
      btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
      reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
      necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
      free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
      
      To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
      data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
      extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
      ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
      btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
      file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
      correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
      and RESERVE_FREE.
      
      As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
      run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
      PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
      EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
      here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
      to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
      
      Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
      btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
      path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
      btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      18513091
  7. 01 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: add missing check for writeback errors on fsync · 0596a904
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When we start an fsync we start ordered extents for all delalloc ranges.
      However before attempting to log the inode, we only wait for those ordered
      extents if we are not doing a full sync (bit BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC
      is set in the inode's flags). This means that if an ordered extent
      completes with an IO error before we check if we can skip logging the
      inode, we will not catch and report the IO error to user space. This is
      because on an IO error, when the ordered extent completes we do not
      update the inode, so if the inode was not previously updated by the
      current transaction we end up not logging it through calls to fsync and
      therefore not check its mapping flags for the presence of IO errors.
      
      Fix this by checking for errors in the flags of the inode's mapping when
      we notice we can skip logging the inode.
      
      This caused sporadic failures in the test generic/331 (which explicitly
      tests for IO errors during an fsync call).
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      0596a904
  8. 26 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  9. 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting after copy_from_user faults · 8b8b08cb
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Commit 56244ef1 was almost but not quite enough to fix the
      reservation math after btrfs_copy_from_user returned partial copies.
      
      Some users are still seeing warnings in btrfs_destroy_inode, and with a
      long enough test run I'm able to trigger them as well.
      
      This patch fixes the accounting math again, bringing it much closer to
      the way it was before the sectorsize conversion Chandan did.  The
      problem is accounting for the offset into the page/sector when we do a
      partial copy.  This one just uses the dirty_sectors variable which
      should already be updated properly.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+
      8b8b08cb
  10. 08 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix callers of btrfs_block_rsv_migrate · 25d609f8
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      So btrfs_block_rsv_migrate just unconditionally calls block_rsv_migrate_bytes.
      Not only this but it unconditionally changes the size of the block_rsv.  This
      isn't a bug strictly speaking, but it makes truncate block rsv's look funny
      because every time we migrate bytes over its size grows, even though we only
      want it to be a specific size.  So collapse this into one function that takes an
      update_size argument and make truncate and evict not update the size for
      consistency sake.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      25d609f8
  11. 23 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to · c6887cd1
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Before we write into prealloc/nocow space we have to make sure that there are no
      references to the extents we are writing into, which means checking the extent
      tree and csum tree in the case of nocow.  So we don't want to do the nocow dance
      unless we can't reserve data space, since it's a serious drag on performance.
      With the following sequence
      
      fallocate -l10737418240 /mnt/btrfs-test/file
      cp --reflink /mnt/btrfs-test/file /mnt/btrfs-test/link
      fio --name=randwrite --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --filename=/mnt/btrfs-test/file \
      	--end_fsync=1
      
      we get the worst case scenario where we have to fall back on to doing the check
      anyway.
      
      Without this patch
      lat (usec): min=5, max=111598, avg=27.65, stdev=124.51
      write: io=10240MB, bw=126876KB/s, iops=31718, runt= 82646msec
      
      With this patch
      lat (usec): min=3, max=91210, avg=14.09, stdev=110.62
      write: io=10240MB, bw=212753KB/s, iops=53188, runt= 49286msec
      
      We get twice the throughput, half of the runtime, and half of the average
      latency.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      [ PAGE_CACHE_ removal related fixups ]
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c6887cd1
  12. 27 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: fix handling of faults from btrfs_copy_from_user · 56244ef1
      Chris Mason 提交于
      When btrfs_copy_from_user isn't able to copy all of the pages, we need
      to adjust our accounting to reflect the work that was actually done.
      
      Commit 2e78c927 changed around the decisions a little and we ended up
      skipping the accounting adjustments some of the time.  This commit makes
      sure that when we don't copy anything at all, we still hop into
      the adjustments, and switches to release_bytes instead of write_bytes,
      since write_bytes isn't aligned.
      
      The accounting errors led to warnings during btrfs_destroy_inode:
      
      [   70.847532] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 514 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9350 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x2b3/0x2c0
      [   70.847536] Modules linked in: i2c_piix4 virtio_net i2c_core input_leds button led_class serio_raw acpi_cpufreq sch_fq_codel autofs4 virtio_blk
      [   70.847538] CPU: 10 PID: 514 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W 4.6.0-rc6_00062_g2997da1-dirty #23
      [   70.847539] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.0-1.fc24 04/01/2014
      [   70.847542]  0000000000000000 ffff880ff5cafab8 ffffffff8149d5e9 0000000000000202
      [   70.847543]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff880ff5cafb08
      [   70.847547]  ffffffff8107bdfd ffff880ff5cafaf8 000024868120013d ffff880ff5cafb28
      [   70.847547] Call Trace:
      [   70.847550]  [<ffffffff8149d5e9>] dump_stack+0x51/0x78
      [   70.847551]  [<ffffffff8107bdfd>] __warn+0xfd/0x120
      [   70.847553]  [<ffffffff8107be3d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
      [   70.847555]  [<ffffffff8139c9e3>] btrfs_destroy_inode+0x2b3/0x2c0
      [   70.847556]  [<ffffffff812003a1>] ? __destroy_inode+0x71/0x140
      [   70.847558]  [<ffffffff812004b3>] destroy_inode+0x43/0x70
      [   70.847559]  [<ffffffff810b7b5f>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2f/0x40
      [   70.847560]  [<ffffffff81200c68>] evict+0x148/0x1d0
      [   70.847562]  [<ffffffff81398ade>] ? start_transaction+0x3de/0x460
      [   70.847564]  [<ffffffff81200d49>] dispose_list+0x59/0x80
      [   70.847565]  [<ffffffff81201ba0>] evict_inodes+0x180/0x190
      [   70.847566]  [<ffffffff812191ff>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x3f/0x50
      [   70.847568]  [<ffffffff811e95f8>] generic_shutdown_super+0x48/0x100
      [   70.847569]  [<ffffffff810b75c0>] ? woken_wake_function+0x20/0x20
      [   70.847571]  [<ffffffff811e9796>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x30
      [   70.847573]  [<ffffffff81365cde>] btrfs_kill_super+0x1e/0x130
      [   70.847574]  [<ffffffff811e99be>] deactivate_locked_super+0x4e/0x90
      [   70.847576]  [<ffffffff811e9e61>] deactivate_super+0x51/0x70
      [   70.847577]  [<ffffffff8120536f>] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80
      [   70.847579]  [<ffffffff81205402>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
      [   70.847581]  [<ffffffff81098358>] task_work_run+0x68/0xa0
      [   70.847582]  [<ffffffff810022b6>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xd6/0xe0
      [   70.847583]  [<ffffffff81002e1d>] do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x170
      [   70.847586]  [<ffffffff817d4dbc>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
      
      This is the test program I used to force short returns from
      btrfs_copy_from_user
      
      void *dontneed(void *arg)
      {
      	char *p = arg;
      	int ret;
      
      	while(1) {
      		ret = madvise(p, BUFSIZE/4, MADV_DONTNEED);
      		if (ret) {
      			perror("madvise");
      			exit(1);
      		}
      	}
      }
      
      int main(int ac, char **av) {
      	int ret;
      	int fd;
      	char *filename;
      	unsigned long offset;
      	char *buf;
      	int i;
      	pthread_t tid;
      
      	if (ac != 2) {
      		fprintf(stderr, "usage: dammitdave filename\n");
      		exit(1);
      	}
      
      	buf = mmap(NULL, BUFSIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
      		   MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
      	if (buf == MAP_FAILED) {
      		perror("mmap");
      		exit(1);
      	}
      	memset(buf, 'a', BUFSIZE);
      	filename = av[1];
      
      	ret = pthread_create(&tid, NULL, dontneed, buf);
      	if (ret) {
      		fprintf(stderr, "error %d from pthread_create\n", ret);
      		exit(1);
      	}
      
      	ret = pthread_detach(tid);
      	if (ret) {
      		fprintf(stderr, "pthread detach failed %d\n", ret);
      		exit(1);
      	}
      
      	while (1) {
      		fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0600);
      		if (fd < 0) {
      			perror("open");
      			exit(1);
      		}
      
      		for (i = 0; i < ROUNDS; i++) {
      			int this_write = BUFSIZE;
      
      			offset = rand() % MAXSIZE;
      			ret = pwrite(fd, buf, this_write, offset);
      			if (ret < 0) {
      				perror("pwrite");
      				exit(1);
      			} else if (ret != this_write) {
      				fprintf(stderr, "short write to %s offset %lu ret %d\n",
      					filename, offset, ret);
      				exit(1);
      			}
      			if (i == ROUNDS - 1) {
      				ret = sync_file_range(fd, offset, 4096,
      				    SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE);
      				if (ret < 0) {
      					perror("sync_file_range");
      					exit(1);
      				}
      			}
      		}
      		ret = ftruncate(fd, 0);
      		if (ret < 0) {
      			perror("ftruncate");
      			exit(1);
      		}
      		ret = close(fd);
      		if (ret) {
      			perror("close");
      			exit(1);
      		}
      		ret = unlink(filename);
      		if (ret) {
      			perror("unlink");
      			exit(1);
      		}
      
      	}
      	return 0;
      }
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
      Fixes: 2e78c927
      cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      56244ef1
  13. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 02 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  15. 28 4月, 2016 2 次提交
  16. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  17. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  18. 31 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      btrfs: fix crash/invalid memory access on fsync when using overlayfs · de17e793
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      If the lower or upper directory of an overlayfs mount belong to a btrfs
      file system and we fsync the file through the overlayfs' merged directory
      we ended up accessing an inode that didn't belong to btrfs as if it were
      a btrfs inode at btrfs_sync_file() resulting in a crash like the following:
      
      [ 7782.588845] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000544
      [ 7782.590624] IP: [<ffffffffa030b7ab>] btrfs_sync_file+0x11b/0x3e9 [btrfs]
      [ 7782.591931] PGD 4d954067 PUD 1e878067 PMD 0
      [ 7782.592016] Oops: 0002 [#6] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      [ 7782.592016] Modules linked in: btrfs overlay ppdev crc32c_generic evdev xor raid6_pq psmouse pcspkr sg serio_raw acpi_cpufreq parport_pc parport tpm_tis i2c_piix4 tpm i2c_core processor button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci libata virtio_ring virtio scsi_mod e1000 floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
      [ 7782.592016] CPU: 10 PID: 16437 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G      D         4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-26+ #1
      [ 7782.592016] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [ 7782.592016] task: ffff88001b8d40c0 ti: ffff880137488000 task.ti: ffff880137488000
      [ 7782.592016] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa030b7ab>]  [<ffffffffa030b7ab>] btrfs_sync_file+0x11b/0x3e9 [btrfs]
      [ 7782.592016] RSP: 0018:ffff88013748be40  EFLAGS: 00010286
      [ 7782.592016] RAX: 0000000080000000 RBX: ffff880133b30c88 RCX: 0000000000000001
      [ 7782.592016] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff8148fec0 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
      [ 7782.592016] RBP: ffff88013748bec0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
      [ 7782.624248] R10: ffff88013748be40 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
      [ 7782.624248] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000009305a0 R15: ffff880015e3be40
      [ 7782.624248] FS:  00007fa83b9cb700(0000) GS:ffff88023ed40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 7782.624248] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [ 7782.624248] CR2: 0000000000000544 CR3: 00000001fa652000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      [ 7782.624248] Stack:
      [ 7782.624248]  ffffffff8108b5cc ffff88013748bec0 0000000000000246 ffff8800b005ded0
      [ 7782.624248]  ffff880133b30d60 8000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000246
      [ 7782.624248]  0000000000000246 ffffffff81074f9b ffffffff8104357c ffff880015e3be40
      [ 7782.624248] Call Trace:
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff8108b5cc>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff81074f9b>] ? ___might_sleep+0xce/0x217
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff8104357c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x3c0/0x43a
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff811a2351>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8c/0x9e
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff811a237f>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff811a24d6>] do_fsync+0x31/0x4a
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff811a2700>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
      [ 7782.624248]  [<ffffffff81493617>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
      [ 7782.624248] Code: 85 c0 0f 85 e2 02 00 00 48 8b 45 b0 31 f6 4c 29 e8 48 ff c0 48 89 45 a8 48 8d 83 d8 00 00 00 48 89 c7 48 89 45 a0 e8 fc 43 18 e1 <f0> 41 ff 84 24 44 05 00 00 48 8b 83 58 ff ff ff 48 c1 e8 07 83
      [ 7782.624248] RIP  [<ffffffffa030b7ab>] btrfs_sync_file+0x11b/0x3e9 [btrfs]
      [ 7782.624248]  RSP <ffff88013748be40>
      [ 7782.624248] CR2: 0000000000000544
      [ 7782.661994] ---[ end trace 721e14960eb939bc ]---
      
      This started happening since commit 4bacc9c9 (overlayfs: Make f_path
      always point to the overlay and f_inode to the underlay) and even though
      after this change we could still access the btrfs inode through
      struct file->f_mapping->host or struct file->f_inode, we would end up
      resulting in more similar issues later on at check_parent_dirs_for_sync()
      because the dentry we got (from struct file->f_path.dentry) was from
      overlayfs and not from btrfs, that is, we had no way of getting the dentry
      that belonged to btrfs (we always got the dentry that belonged to
      overlayfs).
      
      The new patch from Miklos Szeredi, titled "vfs: add file_dentry()" and
      recently submitted to linux-fsdevel, adds a file_dentry() API that allows
      us to get the btrfs dentry from the input file and therefore being able
      to fsync when the upper and lower directories belong to btrfs filesystems.
      
      This issue has been reported several times by users in the mailing list
      and bugzilla. A test case for xfstests is being submitted as well.
      
      Fixes: 4bacc9c9 ("overlayfs: Make f_path always point to the overlay and f_inode to the underlay")
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101951
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109791Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      de17e793
  19. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 02 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race when checking if we can skip fsync'ing an inode · affc0ff9
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      If we're about to do a fast fsync for an inode and btrfs_inode_in_log()
      returns false, it's possible that we had an ordered extent in progress
      (btrfs_finish_ordered_io() not run yet) when we noticed that the inode's
      last_trans field was not greater than the id of the last committed
      transaction, but shortly after, before we checked if there were any
      ongoing ordered extents, the ordered extent had just completed and
      removed itself from the inode's ordered tree, in which case we end up not
      logging the inode, losing some data if a power failure or crash happens
      after the fsync handler returns and before the transaction is committed.
      
      Fix this by checking first if there are any ongoing ordered extents
      before comparing the inode's last_trans with the id of the last committed
      transaction - when it completes, an ordered extent always updates the
      inode's last_trans before it removes itself from the inode's ordered
      tree (at btrfs_finish_ordered_io()).
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      affc0ff9
  22. 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  23. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  24. 02 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  25. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      wrappers for ->i_mutex access · 5955102c
      Al Viro 提交于
      parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested},
      inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex).
      
      Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle
      ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held
      only shared.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      5955102c