1. 29 7月, 2020 10 次提交
  2. 18 7月, 2020 1 次提交
    • E
      xfs: preserve inode versioning across remounts · 4750a171
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      The MS_I_VERSION mount flag is exposed via the VFS, as documented
      in the mount manpages etc; see the iversion and noiversion mount
      options in mount(8).
      
      As a result, mount -o remount looks for this option in /proc/mounts
      and will only send the I_VERSION flag back in during remount it it
      is present.  Since it's not there, a remount will /remove/ the
      I_VERSION flag at the vfs level, and iversion functionality is lost.
      
      xfs v5 superblocks intend to always have i_version enabled; it is
      set as a default at mount time, but is lost during remount for the
      reasons above.
      
      The generic fix would be to expose this documented option in
      /proc/mounts, but since that was rejected, fix it up again in the
      xfs remount path instead, so that at least xfs won't suffer from
      this misbehavior.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      4750a171
  3. 14 7月, 2020 3 次提交
  4. 10 7月, 2020 1 次提交
    • W
      xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with sb_internal & fs_reclaim · c3f2375b
      Waiman Long 提交于
      Depending on the workloads, the following circular locking dependency
      warning between sb_internal (a percpu rwsem) and fs_reclaim (a pseudo
      lock) may show up:
      
      ======================================================
      WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
      5.0.0-rc1+ #60 Tainted: G        W
      ------------------------------------------------------
      fsfreeze/4346 is trying to acquire lock:
      0000000026f1d784 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at:
      fs_reclaim_acquire.part.19+0x5/0x30
      
      but task is already holding lock:
      0000000072bfc54b (sb_internal){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0xb4/0x650
      
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
        :
       Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
             CPU0                    CPU1
             ----                    ----
        lock(sb_internal);
                                     lock(fs_reclaim);
                                     lock(sb_internal);
        lock(fs_reclaim);
      
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      4 locks held by fsfreeze/4346:
       #0: 00000000b478ef56 (sb_writers#8){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0xb4/0x650
       #1: 000000001ec487a9 (&type->s_umount_key#28){++++}, at: freeze_super+0xda/0x290
       #2: 000000003edbd5a0 (sb_pagefaults){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0xb4/0x650
       #3: 0000000072bfc54b (sb_internal){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0xb4/0x650
      
      stack backtrace:
      Call Trace:
       dump_stack+0xe0/0x19a
       print_circular_bug.isra.10.cold.34+0x2f4/0x435
       check_prev_add.constprop.19+0xca1/0x15f0
       validate_chain.isra.14+0x11af/0x3b50
       __lock_acquire+0x728/0x1200
       lock_acquire+0x269/0x5a0
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.19+0x29/0x30
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20
       kmem_cache_alloc+0x3e/0x3f0
       kmem_zone_alloc+0x79/0x150
       xfs_trans_alloc+0xfa/0x9d0
       xfs_sync_sb+0x86/0x170
       xfs_log_sbcount+0x10f/0x140
       xfs_quiesce_attr+0x134/0x270
       xfs_fs_freeze+0x4a/0x70
       freeze_super+0x1af/0x290
       do_vfs_ioctl+0xedc/0x16c0
       ksys_ioctl+0x41/0x80
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xa9
       do_syscall_64+0x18f/0xd23
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
      
      This is a false positive as all the dirty pages are flushed out before
      the filesystem can be frozen.
      
      One way to avoid this splat is to add GFP_NOFS to the affected allocation
      calls by using the memalloc_nofs_save()/memalloc_nofs_restore() pair.
      This shouldn't matter unless the system is really running out of memory.
      In that particular case, the filesystem freeze operation may fail while
      it was succeeding previously.
      
      Without this patch, the command sequence below will show that the lock
      dependency chain sb_internal -> fs_reclaim exists.
      
       # fsfreeze -f /home
       # fsfreeze --unfreeze /home
       # grep -i fs_reclaim -C 3 /proc/lockdep_chains | grep -C 5 sb_internal
      
      After applying the patch, such sb_internal -> fs_reclaim lock dependency
      chain can no longer be found. Because of that, the locking dependency
      warning will not be shown.
      Suggested-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWaiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      c3f2375b
  5. 07 7月, 2020 25 次提交