In a000 devices we will support up to 32 stations.
The max station define is used also for invalid station marking
which makes finding usages of actual maximum station pretty hard
to sort through - change it to be a different define in order
to make future changes easier.
Use also ARRAY_SIZE intead of define when possible.
Do not move yet to 32 stations until firmware do it though.
Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The value for Channel 14 was wrong. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Those comments were wrong, fix them.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This enum is already perfectly aliased to enum nl80211_band, and
the only reason for it is that we get IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS out of
it. There's no really good reason to not declare the number of
bands in nl80211 though, so do that and remove the cfg80211 one.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

API version lower than 16 is not supported anymore - don't
load older ucode.
Remove code handling older versions.
Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

ilw@linux.intel.com is not available anymore.
linuxwifi@intel.com should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Fix the gaps between the system requirements and our code.
Signed-off-by: NAvri Altman <avri.altman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

When there's a bt-wifi contention that requires arbitration,
we use a priority-based mechanism to decide which comm wins.
Over time, use cases become more and more complex, with multiple
concurrent active links with different traffic types and different QoS
requirements, on both WiFi and BT sides.
This, in turn, requires us to elaborate our prioritization mechanism.
However, our legacy products included hw that does not supports this,
so selectively enable this on specific hw - as signaled by the firmware.
Signed-off-by: NAvri Altman <avri.altman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Part of reorganising wireless drivers directory and Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

In the mvm driver, neither the old command nor the return value
are used, so remove them.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Currently, loading the firmware fails when it has higher API or CAPA
bits than the driver supports. That's an issue with integration.

At the same time, actually using api[0] and capa[0] will become
confusing when we also have api[1] and capa[1], and it's almost
certain that we'll mix up the bits and use the bits for api[1] with
api[0] by accident.

Avoid all this by translating the API/CAPA bits to the regular kernel
test_bit() format, and also providing wrapper functions. Also use the
__bitwise__ facility of sparse to check that we're testing the right
one.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The commit below fixed this for the old firmware API only.
Since the new firmware API hasn't been released yet, this
doesn't fix anything on currently existing firmwares.
This completes:

commit afcee962
Author: Eyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 9 15:18:17 2015 +0200

    iwlwifi: mvm: fix BT coex shared antenna activity check

type=bugfix
bug=not-tracked
fixes=unknown
Reviewed-by: NEyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The BT_CONFIG command used to be very long, hence it was
allocated on the heap in the previous API. In the new API,
this command is much smaller, and can now safely be
allocated on the stack.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Since we don't need to configure the Ack / CTS kill mask
anymore in the new API, we don't need to iterate all the
interfaces upon rssi event on one of the interfaces.
Remove that code.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

We will be able to add more events, such as MLME events and
others. The low level driver may be interested in knowing
about these events to dump firmware data upon failures, or
to change parameters in case connection attempts fail etc...
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The firmware was not using the new API, so we don't need to
differentiate between the different stages of this new API.
The main difference here is that most of the hard coded
values are not sent through the command anymore.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The commit below introduced an unsafe dereference of
mvmvif->phy_ctxt. It can be NULL even if we hold the mutex.
We can be handling a BT Coex notification while the vif has
already been unassigned. This can happen since the BT Coex
notification is hanled asynchronuously: we can have started
to handle the BT Coex notification trying to acquire the
mutex while the unassign flow already got it. The BT Coex
notification handling will wait for the mutext. I'll get it
later, but then mvmvif->phy_ctxt will be NULL.

Panic log:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at   (null)
IP: [<f985180d>] iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator+0x9d/0x340 [iwlmvm]
*pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = f000eef300000007
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Workqueue: events iwl_mvm_async_handlers_wk [iwlmvm]
task: ed719b20 ti: ec03e000 task.ti: ec03e000
EIP: 0060:[<f985180d>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2
EIP is at iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator+0x9d/0x340 [iwlmvm]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: f6d3cb70 ECX: f6d3cb70 EDX: 00000000
ESI: ec03fe40 EDI: efeb8810 EBP: ec03fdf0 ESP: ec03fdac
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 01a1a000 CR4: 001407f0
Stack:
 f743ca80 f744a404 ec03fdcc c10e3952 00003aba f743ca80 00000246 f743ca80
 00000246 00000000 00000001 00000000 ebd45ff6 ebd458a4 f6d3c500 ebd45578
 ebd44b01 ec03fe18 f99e1bc2 00000002 ebd44bc0 f9851770 00000000 f6d3c500
Call Trace:
 [<c10e3952>] ? ring_buffer_unlock_commit+0xa2/0xd0
 [<f99e1bc2>] __iterate_interfaces+0x82/0x110 [mac80211]
 [<f9851770>] ? iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp+0x140/0x140 [iwlmvm]
 [<f99e1c6a>] ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic+0x1a/0x20 [mac80211]
 [<f9851427>] iwl_mvm_bt_coex_notif_handle+0x77/0x280 [iwlmvm]
 [<f9852161>] iwl_mvm_rx_bt_coex_notif_old+0x211/0x220 [iwlmvm]
 [<f9850b8b>] iwl_mvm_rx_bt_coex_notif+0x19b/0x1b0 [iwlmvm]
 [<f983944f>] iwl_mvm_async_handlers_wk+0x7f/0xe0 [iwlmvm]

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.19+]
Fixes: 123f5156 ("iwlwifi: mvm: BT Coex - add support for TTC / RRC")
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Packet Level Co-Running is a BT Coex feature which is
supported on certain devices only, hence the need for
a TLV flag for it.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

With this value, we de-facto disable the feature. Since it
is not working yet, disable it completely.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

There are a few places not using it, use it at those places.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

When we need only one antenna, we should refrain from using
the antenna that is shared with BT if BT load is high.
Fix this.
Reviewed-by: NEyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

This makes it easier to tune the values during the testing.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

This is were it really needs to be.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.16+]
Fixes: 2adc8949 ("iwlwifi: mvm: BT Coex - fix boost register / LUT values")
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The sharing model will differ in new hardware. Define the
non shared antenna based on the device so that different
devices can have different names for the non shared antenna.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

smps_mode is used uninitialized in a debug statement in AP
mode, so always initialize it.

While at it, fix a typo.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The variable 'u32 mode' exists twice, the latter shadowing
the former - remove the latter since there's no need for
two variables.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Our legal structure changed at some point (see wikipedia), but
we forgot to immediately switch over to the new copyright
notice.

For files that we have modified in the time since the change,
add the proper copyright notice now.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Leave it to default instead - regardless of the BT activity.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

According to new requirements, the ACK / CTS kill mask is
not related to reduced TX power anymore. This allows to
remove the code that tracked reduced TX power enablement
across different interfaces.
The ACK / CTS kill mask is now fetch from a table. It
depends on the Activity grading (activity from BT) and on
the Look Up Table (LUT) type.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

A copy paste issue broke the rate control when a firmware
with the old API is used.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

When TxTxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constraints
on the rate control.
When RxRxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constrains
on SMPS.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Tell the firmware if TTC should be enabled when switching
to High Band.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that, and open the patch to the updates.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

Start the new BT Coex implementation.
Don't react to notifications for now - only the initial
configuration is implemented. The rest will happen in next
patches.
Since coex.c now uses the new the new structures in all
functions, we need to adapt the code to compile, even if it
doesn't run yet.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

A new API is coming. This new API is not backward
compatible. So we need to keep the old commands to be able
to work with the former API.
Move all the current code into a new file: coex_legacy.
If a firmware with the new API is detected, we currently
just bail out since the implementation of the new API will
come in future patches.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

If BT is active, we need to refrain from using the shared
antenna. This logic is done in the firmware when we use the
link quality tables. But for management frames, the rate is
written in the Tx command by the driver.
Hence the driver needs to make sure not use the shared
antenna when BT is active for any frames that don't use
the rate scale table such as management frames or multicast.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

This really belongs to the constants file.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>