mtd->writesize and len are unsigned so the test does not work.
Signed-off-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NMika Korhonen <ext-mika.2.korhonen@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Add support for multiblock erase command. OneNANDs (excluding Flex-OneNAND)
are capable of simultaneous erase of up to 64 eraseblocks which is much faster.

This changes the erase requests for regions covering multiple eraseblocks
to be performed using multiblock erase.
Signed-off-by: NMika Korhonen <ext-mika.2.korhonen@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Separate the actual execution of erase to a new function:
onenand_block_by_block_erase(). This is done in preparation for
the multiblock erase support.
Signed-off-by: NMika Korhonen <ext-mika.2.korhonen@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

What is OTP in OneNAND?
The device includes,
1. one block-sized OTP (One Time Programmable) area and
2. user-controlled 1st block OTP(Block 0)
that can be used to increase system security or to provide
identification capabilities.

What is done?
In OneNAND, one block of the NAND Array is set aside as an OTP
memory area, and 1st Block (Block 0) can be used as OTP area.
This area, available to the user, can be configured and locked
with secured user information. The OTP block can be read,
programmed and locked using the same operations as any other NAND
Flash Array memory block. After issuing an OTP-Lock, OTP block
cannot be erased. OTP block is fully-guaranteed to be a good
block.

Why it is done?
Locking the 1st Block OTP has the effect of a 'Write-protect' to
guard against accidental re-programming of data stored in the 1st
block and OTP Block.

Which problem it solves?
OTP support is provided in the existing implementation of
OneNAND/Flex-OneNAND driver, but it is not working with OneNAND
devices. Have observed the following in current OTP OneNAND Implmentation,
1. DataSheet specific sequence to lock the OTP Area is not followed.
2. Certain functions are quiet generic to cope with OTP specific activity.
This patch re-implements OTP support for OneNAND device.

How it is done?
For all blocks, 8th word is available to the user.
However, in case of OTP Block, 8th word of sector 0, page 0 is reserved as
OTP Locking Bit area. Therefore, in case of OTP Block, user usage on this
area is prohibited. Condition specific values are entered in the 8th word,
sector0, page 0 of the OTP block during the process of issuing an OTP-Lock.
The possible conditions are:
1. Only 1st Block Lock
2. Only OTP Block Lock
3. Lock both the 1st Block and the OTP Block

What Other feature additions have been done in this patch?
This patch adds feature for:
1. Only 1st Block Lock
2. Lock both the 1st Block and the OTP Blocks

Re-implemented OTP support for OneNAND
Added following features to OneNAND
	1. Lock only 1st Block in OneNAND
	2. Lock BOTH 1st Block and OTP Block in OneNAND

[comments were slightly tweaked by Artem]
Signed-off-by: NAmul Kumar Saha <amul.saha@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

This patch resolves all the prints present in onenand_base.c
Primarily, it replaces the hard-coded function names in the prints,
and makes use of __func__.
Signed-off-by: NAmul Kumar Saha <amul.saha@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NMika Korhonen <mika.j.korhonen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

This patch unifies the flex_bdry setting for module vs. built-in 
configuration of OneNAND.
Signed-off-by: NAmul Kumar Saha <amul.saha@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NVishak G <vishak.g@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Add bbt_wait & unlock_all as replaceable for some platform such as
  s3c64xx s3c64xx has its own OneNAND controller and another interface
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Add support for Samsung Flex-OneNAND devices.

Flex-OneNAND combines SLC and MLC technologies into a single device.
SLC area provides increased reliability and speed, suitable for storing
code such as bootloader, kernel and root file system.  MLC area
provides high density and is suitable for storing user data.

SLC and MLC regions can be configured through kernel parameter.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: export flexoand_region and onenand_addr]
Signed-off-by: NRohit Hagargundgi <h.rohit@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Vishak G <vishak.g@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

In addition to adding the Numonyx manufacturer code, this patch
also ensures 'sync. write' is disabled when reading identification
data - something that the Numonyx chip objects to, but the
Samsung chip seems to ignore.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

OneNAND write-while-program method of writing improves performance,
compared with ordinary writes, by transferring data to OneNAND's
RAM buffers atthe same time as programming the NAND core.

When writing several NAND pages at a time, an improvement of
12% to 25% is seen.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

MTD internal API presently uses 32-bit values to represent
device size.  This patch updates them to 64-bits but leaves
the external API unchanged.  Extending the external API
is a separate issue for several reasons.  First, no one
needs it at the moment.  Secondly, whether the implementation
is done with IOCTLs, sysfs or both is still debated.  Thirdly
external API changes require the internal API to be accepted
first.

Note that although the MTD API will be able to support 64-bit
device sizes, existing drivers do not and are not required
to do so, although NAND base has been updated.

In general, changing from 32-bit to 64-bit values cause little
or no changes to the majority of the code with the following
exceptions:
    	- printk message formats
    	- division and modulus of 64-bit values
    	- NAND base support
	- 32-bit local variables used by mtdpart and mtdconcat
	- naughtily assuming one structure maps to another
	in MEMERASE ioctl
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>

To get the correct information in case of power off recovery,
it should read ECC status first
Also remove previous workaround method.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

A power loss while writing can result in a page becoming unreadable.  
When the device is mounted again, reading that page gives controller 
errors. Upper level software like JFFS2 treat -EIO as fatal, refusing to 
mount at all.  That means it is necessary to treat the error as an ECC 
error to allow recovery. Note that typically in this case, the 
eraseblock can still be erased and rewritten i.e. it has not become a 
bad block.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Acked-By: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Implement the panic_write function for the onenand driver. This waits
for any active command to complete/timeout, performs the write, waits
for it to complete and then returns.
Signed-off-by: NRichard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

In function onenand_verify_oob, local variable oobbuf shall be unsigned char.

In the case of a value is >= 0x80, it's unequal in comparing the value in an unsigned char and signed char.
Signed-off-by: NSheng Yongjie (Sam) <samsheng@trident.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Some chips don't set the ONENAND_CTRL_LOAD bit.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Use the higher bits for other purpose.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Consolidate OneNAND operation order as OneNAND Spec.
It also doesn't break previous operation order.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

When an ECC error occurs, the read should be completed
anyway before returning -EBADMSG.  Returning -EBADMSG
straight away is incorrect.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

When the erase callback performs some other action on the flash, it's
highly likely to deadlock unless we actually release the chip lock
before calling it.

This patch mirrors that same change already done for NAND.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

The OneNAND driver was confusing JFFS2 by returning positive error
codes.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Ensure OneNAND's block locking operations are synchronized
like all other operations.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Acked-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

This patch make the OneNAND driver much less racy. It fixes
our "onenand_wait: read timeout!" heisenbugs. The reason of
these bugs was that the driver did not lock the chip when
accessing OTP, and it screwed up OneNAND state when the OTP
was read while JFFS2 was doing FS checking.

This patch also fixes other races I spotted:
1. BBT was not protected
2. Access to ecc_stats was not protected

Now the chip is locked when BBT is accessed.

To fix all of these I basically split all interface functions
on 'function()' and 'function_nolock()' parts.

I tested this patch on N800 hardware - it fixes our problems.
But I tested a little different version because our OneNAND
codebase is slightly out-of-date. But it should be OK.

This patch also includes the prin fixes I posted before.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Now we can use yaffs2 on OneNAND
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

To enable the main read/write at oob ops

Next time we will commit the main read/write support for yaffs2
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

The 2X Program is an extension of Program Operation.

Since the device is equipped with two DataRAMs, and two-plane NAND Flash 
memory array, these two component enables simultaneous program of 4KiB.
Plane1 has only even blocks such as block0, block2, block4 while Plane2 
has only odd blocks such as block1, block3, block5.
So MTD regards it as 4KiB page size and 256KiB block size

Now the following chips support it. (KFXXX16Q2M)
Demux: KFG2G16Q2M, KFH4G16Q2M, KFW8G16Q2M,
Mux:   KFM2G16Q2M, KFN4G16Q2M,

And more recent chips
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NMichael Opdenacker <michael@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

The JFFS2 requests OOB function from column 0.
But the oobtest in nand-tests doesn't.
So we only exit loop only when column start with 0.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Here it's not the case: all the entries are occupied by
OOB chunks. Therefore, once we get into a loop like

        for (free = this->ecclayout->oobfree; free->length; ++free) {
	}

we might end up scanning past the real oobfree array.

Probably the best way out, as the same thing might happen for common NAND
as well, is to check index against MTD_MAX_OOBFREE_ENTRIES.
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>