Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 25 4月, 2019 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy · 79ffac85
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      In the current scheme, on submitting a request we take a single global
GEM wakeref, which trickles down to wake up all GT power domains. This
is undesirable as we would like to be able to localise our power
management to the available power domains and to remove the global GEM
operations from the heart of the driver. (The intent there is to push
global GEM decisions to the boundary as used by the GEM user interface.)

Now during request construction, each request is responsible via its
logical context to acquire a wakeref on each power domain it intends to
utilize. Currently, each request takes a wakeref on the engine(s) and
the engines themselves take a chipset wakeref. This gives us a
transition on each engine which we can extend if we want to insert more
powermangement control (such as soft rc6). The global GEM operations
that currently require a struct_mutex are reduced to listening to pm
events from the chipset GT wakeref. As we reduce the struct_mutex
requirement, these listeners should evaporate.

Perhaps the biggest immediate change is that this removes the
struct_mutex requirement around GT power management, allowing us greater
flexibility in request construction. Another important knock-on effect,
is that by tracking engine usage, we can insert a switch back to the
kernel context on that engine immediately, avoiding any extra delay or
inserting global synchronisation barriers. This makes tracking when an
engine and its associated contexts are idle much easier -- important for
when we forgo our assumed execution ordering and need idle barriers to
unpin used contexts. In the process, it means we remove a large chunk of
code whose only purpose was to switch back to the kernel context.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424200717.1686-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      79ffac85
    • C
      drm/i915: Introduce context->enter() and context->exit() · 6eee33e8
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      We wish to start segregating the power management into different control
domains, both with respect to the hardware and the user interface. The
first step is that at the lowest level flow of requests, we want to
process a context event (and not a global GEM operation). In this patch,
we introduce the context callbacks that in future patches will be
redirected to per-engine interfaces leading to global operations as
required.

The intent is that this will be guarded by the timeline->mutex, except
that retiring has not quite finished transitioning over from being
guarded by struct_mutex. So at the moment it is protected by
struct_mutex with a reminded to switch.

v2: Rename default handlers to intel_context_enter_engine.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424200717.1686-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      6eee33e8
    • C
      drm/i915: Move GraphicsTechnology files under gt/ · 112ed2d3
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Start partitioning off the code that talks to the hardware (GT) from the
uapi layers and move the device facing code under gt/

One casualty is s/intel_ringbuffer.h/intel_engine.h/ with the plan to
subdivide that header and body further (and split out the submission
code from the ringbuffer and logical context handling). This patch aims
to be simple motion so git can fixup inflight patches with little mess.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424174839.7141-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      112ed2d3
  5. 24 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 12 4月, 2019 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Flush the CSB pointer reset · 0edda1d6
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The HW resets it CSB tail pointer on resetting the engine. Most of the
time. In case it doesn't (and for system resume) we write the expected
value anyway. For extra paranoia, flush the write before we invalidate
the cacheline.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190412110159.10495-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      0edda1d6
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Always reset the context's RING registers · 1863e302
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      During reset, we try and stop the active ring. This has the consequence
that we often clobber the RING registers within the context image. When
we find an active request, we update the context image to rerun that
request (if it was guilty, we replace the hanging user payload with
NOPs). However, we were ignoring an active context if the request had
completed, with the consequence that the next submission on that request
would start with RING_HEAD==0 and not the tail of the previous request,
causing all requests still in the ring to be rerun. Rare, but
occasionally seen within CI where we would spot that the context seqno
would reverse and complain that we were retiring an incomplete request.

    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373352us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3640 -> current 3638
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373353us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3642 -> current 3638
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373354us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3644 -> current 3638
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373354us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3646 -> current 3638
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373356us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]:  ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3646 (current 3638), prio=4
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373374us : __i915_request_commit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373377us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=2, tail=3
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373377us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373378us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648 -> current 3638
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3..s1 408373378us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=5
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373379us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]:  ctx=2.2, fence 1e95b:3648 (current 3638), prio=4
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373381us : i915_reset_engine: rcs0 flags=4
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373382us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0: depth<-0
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00008002:0x00000002, active=0x1
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=2.2, fence 1e95b:3648 (current 3640), prio=4
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373401us : intel_engine_stop_cs: rcs0
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373402us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=4, tail=4
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373403us : intel_gpu_reset: engine_mask=1
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373408us : execlists_cancel_port_requests: rcs0:port0 fence 1e95b:3648, (current 3648)
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373442us : intel_engine_cancel_stop_cs: rcs0
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373442us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0: depth->0
    <0> [412.390350] ksoftirq-26      3..s. 408373442us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0
    <0> [412.390350] ksoftirq-26      3d.s1 408373443us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=5
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373475us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3640, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373476us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3640, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373494us : __i915_request_commit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3650
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373496us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=5
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373496us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3650 -> current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0d..1 408373498us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]:  ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3650 (current 3648), prio=6
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373500us : i915_request_retire_upto: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373500us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3642, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373501us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3642, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373514us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3644, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373515us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3644, current 3648
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373527us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3646, current 3640
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3..s1 408373569us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=1
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373569us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=1
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000002, active=0x5
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3650 (current 3650), prio=6
    <0> [412.390350]   <idle>-0       3d.s2 408373571us : process_csb: rcs0 completed ctx=2
    <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613    0.... 408373621us : i915_request_retire: i915_request_retire:253 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(request))

v2: Fixup the cancellation path to drain the CSB and reset the pointers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190411130515.20716-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1863e302
    • C
      drm/i915/guc: Implement reset locally · 292ad25c
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Before causing guc and execlists to diverge further (breaking guc in the
process), take a copy of the current reset procedure and make it local to
the guc submission backend
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190411130515.20716-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      292ad25c
  9. 11 4月, 2019 3 次提交
  11. 05 4月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Make RING_PDP relative to engine->mmio_base · 6d425728
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The PDP registers are an oddity inside the set of context saved
registers in that they take the engine as a parameter to the macro and
not the mmio_base as the others do. Make it accept the engine->mmio_base
for consistency in programming the context registers.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 3/-32 (-29)
Function                                     old     new   delta
emit_ppgtt_update                            324     326      +2
capture                                     5102    5103      +1
execlists_init_reg_state.isra               1128    1096     -32

And similar savings later!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190405123831.9724-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      6d425728
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for gen8 · bac24f59
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When we introduced preemption, we chose to keep it disabled for gen8 as
supporting preemption inside GPGPU user batches required various w/a in
userspace. Since then, the desire to preempt long queues of requests
between batches (e.g. within busywaiting semaphores) has grown. So allow
arbitration within the busywaits and between requests, but disable
arbitration within user batches so that we can preempt between requests
and not risk breaking GPGPU.

However, since this preemption is much coarser and doesn't interfere
with userspace, we decline to include it amongst the scheduler
capabilities. (This is also required for us to skip over the preemption
selftests that expect to be able to preempt user batches.)

Michal suggested that we could perhaps allow preemption inside gen8
userspace batches if we can satisfy ourselves that the default
preemption settings are viable with existing userspace (principally
OpenCL which already should carry any known workaround). We could then
merge the two code paths back into one, even dropping the artifical
has-preemption device feature flag.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_scheduler/semaphore-user
References: beecec90 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!")
Fixes: e8861964 ("drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> #irc
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190329134024.5254-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      bac24f59
  13. 27 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  15. 22 3月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow contexts to share a single timeline across all engines · ea593dbb
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Previously, our view has been always to run the engines independently
within a context. (Multiple engines happened before we had contexts and
timelines, so they always operated independently and that behaviour
persisted into contexts.) However, at the user level the context often
represents a single timeline (e.g. GL contexts) and userspace must
ensure that the individual engines are serialised to present that
ordering to the client (or forgot about this detail entirely and hope no
one notices - a fair ploy if the client can only directly control one
engine themselves ;)

In the next patch, we will want to construct a set of engines that
operate as one, that have a single timeline interwoven between them, to
present a single virtual engine to the user. (They submit to the virtual
engine, then we decide which engine to execute on based.)

To that end, we want to be able to create contexts which have a single
timeline (fence context) shared between all engines, rather than multiple
timelines.

v2: Move the specialised timeline ordering to its own function.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190322092325.5883-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      ea593dbb
    • C
      drm/i915: Flush pages on acquisition · a679f58d
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When we return pages to the system, we ensure that they are marked as
being in the CPU domain since any external access is uncontrolled and we
must assume the worst. This means that we need to always flush the pages
on acquisition if we need to use them on the GPU, and from the beginning
have used set-domain. Set-domain is overkill for the purpose as it is a
general synchronisation barrier, but our intent is to only flush the
pages being swapped in. If we move that flush into the pages acquisition
phase, we know then that when we have obj->mm.pages, they are coherent
with the GPU and need only maintain that status without resorting to
heavy handed use of set-domain.

The principle knock-on effect for userspace is through mmap-gtt
pagefaulting. Our uAPI has always implied that the GTT mmap was async
(especially as when any pagefault occurs is unpredicatable to userspace)
and so userspace had to apply explicit domain control itself
(set-domain). However, swapping is transparent to the kernel, and so on
first fault we need to acquire the pages and make them coherent for
access through the GTT. Our use of set-domain here leaks into the uABI
that the first pagefault was synchronous. This is unintentional and
baring a few igt should be unoticed, nevertheless we bump the uABI
version for mmap-gtt to reflect the change in behaviour.

Another implication of the change is that gem_create() is presumed to
create an object that is coherent with the CPU and is in the CPU write
domain, so a set-domain(CPU) following a gem_create() would be a minor
operation that merely checked whether we could allocate all pages for
the object. On applying this change, a set-domain(CPU) causes a clflush
as we acquire the pages. This will have a small impact on mesa as we move
the clflush here on !llc from execbuf time to create, but that should
have minimal performance impact as the same clflush exists but is now
done early and because of the clflush issue, userspace recycles bo and
so should resist allocating fresh objects.

Internally, the presumption that objects are created in the CPU
write-domain and remain so through writes to obj->mm.mapping is more
prevalent than I expected; but easy enough to catch and apply a manual
flush.

For the future, we should push the page flush from the central
set_pages() into the callers so that we can more finely control when it
is applied, but for now doing it one location is easier to validate, at
the cost of sometimes flushing when there is no need.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190321161908.8007-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a679f58d
  17. 21 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  19. 19 3月, 2019 4 次提交
  21. 15 3月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Always kick the execlists tasklet after reset · 41a1bde3
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      With direct submission being disabled while the reset in progress, we
have a small window where we may forgo the submission of a new request
and not notice its addition during execlists_reset_finish. To close this
window, always schedule the submission tasklet on coming out of reset to
catch any residual work.

<6> [333.144082] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_engines
<3> [333.296927] i915_reset_engine(rcs0:idle): failed to idle after reset
<6> [333.296932] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] rcs0
<6> [333.296934] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	Hangcheck 0:a9ddf7a5 [4157 ms]
<6> [333.296936] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	Reset count: 36048 (global 754)
<6> [333.296938] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	Requests:
<6> [333.296997] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_START: 0x00000000
<6> [333.296999] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_HEAD:  0x00000000
<6> [333.297001] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_TAIL:  0x00000000
<6> [333.297003] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_CTL:   0x00000000
<6> [333.297005] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_MODE:  0x00000200 [idle]
<6> [333.297007] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	RING_IMR: fffffeff
<6> [333.297010] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	ACTHD:  0x00000000_00000000
<6> [333.297012] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	BBADDR: 0x00000000_00000000
<6> [333.297015] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	DMA_FADDR: 0x00000000_00000000
<6> [333.297017] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	IPEIR: 0x00000000
<6> [333.297019] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	IPEHR: 0x00000000
<6> [333.297021] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	Execlist status: 0x00000001 00000000
<6> [333.297023] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 	Execlist CSB read 5, write 5 [mmio:7], tasklet queued? no (enabled)
<6> [333.297025] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 		ELSP[0] idle
<6> [333.297027] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 		ELSP[1] idle
<6> [333.297028] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 		HW active? 0x0
<6> [333.297044] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 		Queue priority hint: -8186
<6> [333.297067] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] 		Q  2afac:5f2+  prio=-8186 @ 50ms: (null)
<6> [333.297068] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] HWSP:
<6> [333.297071] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [0000] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<6> [333.297073] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *
<6> [333.297075] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [0040] 00000001 00000000 00000018 00000002 00000001 00000000 00000018 00000000
<6> [333.297077] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [0060] 00000001 00000000 00008002 00000002 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000005
<6> [333.297079] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [0080] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<6> [333.297081] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *
<6> [333.297083] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [00c0] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 a9ddf7a5 00000000 00000000 00000000
<6> [333.297085] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [00e0] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<6> [333.297087] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *
<6> [333.297089] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Idle? no
<6> [333.297090] i915_reset_engine(rcs0:idle): 3000 resets
<3> [333.297092] i915/intel_hangcheck_live_selftests: igt_reset_engines failed with error -5
<3> [333.455460] i915 0000:00:02.0: Failed to idle engines, declaring wedged!
...
<0> [333.491294] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262143us : i915_reset_engine: rcs0 flags=4
<0> [333.491328] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262143us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0: depth<-0
<0> [333.491362] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262143us : intel_engine_stop_cs: rcs0
<0> [333.491396] i915_sel-4916    1d..1 333262144us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=5
<0> [333.491424] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262145us : intel_gpu_reset: engine_mask=1
<0> [333.491454] kworker/-214     5.... 333262184us : i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context: awake?=yes
<0> [333.491487] kworker/-214     5.... 333262192us : i915_request_add: rcs0 fence 2afac:1522
<0> [333.491520] kworker/-214     5.... 333262193us : i915_request_add: marking (null) as active
<0> [333.491553] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262199us : intel_engine_cancel_stop_cs: rcs0
<0> [333.491587] i915_sel-4916    1.... 333262199us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0: depth->0
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190313162835.30228-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      41a1bde3
    • C
      drm/i915/gtt: Rename i915_vm_is_48b to i915_vm_is_4lvl · a9fe9ca4
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Large ppGTT are differentiated by the requirement to go to four levels
to address more than 32b. Given the introduction of more 4 level ppGTT
with different sizes of addressable bits, rename i915_vm_is_48b() to
better reflect the commonality of using 4 levels.

Based on a patch by Bob Paauwe.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190314223839.28258-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a9fe9ca4
  23. 12 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 08 3月, 2019 6 次提交
  27. 06 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  29. 02 3月, 2019 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Prioritise non-busywait semaphore workloads · f9e9e9de
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      We don't want to busywait on the GPU if we have other work to do. If we
give non-busywaiting workloads higher (initial) priority than workloads
that require a busywait, we will prioritise work that is ready to run
immediately. We then also have to be careful that we don't give earlier
semaphores an accidental boost because later work doesn't wait on other
rings, hence we keep a history of semaphore usage of the dependency chain.

v2: Stop rolling the bits into a chain and just use a flag in case this
request or any of our dependencies use a semaphore. The rolling around
was contagious as Tvrtko was heard to fall off his chair.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/semaphore
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190301170901.8340-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f9e9e9de
    • C
      drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+ · e8861964
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Having introduced per-context seqno, we now have a means to identity
progress across the system without feel of rollback as befell the
global_seqno. That is we can program a MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT operation in
advance of submission safe in the knowledge that our target seqno and
address is stable.

However, since we are telling the GPU to busy-spin on the target address
until it matches the signaling seqno, we only want to do so when we are
sure that busy-spin will be completed quickly. To achieve this we only
submit the request to HW once the signaler is itself executing (modulo
preemption causing us to wait longer), and we only do so for default and
above priority requests (so that idle priority tasks never themselves
hog the GPU waiting for others).

As might be reasonably expected, HW semaphores excel in inter-engine
synchronisation microbenchmarks (where the 3x reduced latency / increased
throughput more than offset the power cost of spinning on a second ring)
and have significant improvement (can be up to ~10%, most see no change)
for single clients that utilize multiple engines (typically media players
and transcoders), without regressing multiple clients that can saturate
the system or changing the power envelope dramatically.

v3: Drop the older NEQ branch, now we pin the signaler's HWSP anyway.
v4: Tell the world and include it as part of scheduler caps.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper
Testcase: igt/benchmarks/gem_wsim
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190301170901.8340-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      e8861964
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Suppress redundant preemption · 1e3f697e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      On unwinding the active request we give it a small (limited to internal
priority levels) boost to prevent it from being gazumped a second time.
However, this means that it can be promoted to above the request that
triggered the preemption request, causing a preempt-to-idle cycle for no
change. We can avoid this if we take the boost into account when
checking if the preemption request is valid.

v2: After preemption the active request will be after the preemptee if
they end up with equal priority.

v3: Tvrtko pointed out that this, the existing logic, makes
I915_PRIORITY_WAIT non-preemptible. Document this interesting quirk!

v4: Prove Tvrtko was right about WAIT being non-preemptible and test it.
v5: Except not all priorities were made equal, and the WAIT not preempting
is only if we start off as !NEWCLIENT.

v6: More commentary after coming to an understanding about what I had
forgotten to say.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190301170901.8340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1e3f697e
  31. 01 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemption · b5773a36
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      WAIT is occasionally suppressed by virtue of preempted requests being
promoted to NEWCLIENT if they have not all ready received that boost.
Make this consistent for all WAIT boosts that they are not allowed to
preempt executing contexts and are merely granted the right to be at the
front of the queue for the next execution slot. This is in keeping with
the desire that the WAIT boost be a minor tweak that does not give
excessive promotion to its user and open ourselves to trivial abuse.

The problem with the inconsistent WAIT preemption becomes more apparent
as the preemption is propagated across the engines, where one engine may
preempt and the other not, and we be relying on the exact execution
order being consistent across engines (e.g. using HW semaphores to
coordinate parallel execution).

v2: Also protect GuC submission from false preemption loops.
v3: Build bug safeguards and better debug messages for st.
v4: Do the priority bumping in unsubmit (i.e. on preemption/reset
unwind), applying it earlier during submit causes out-of-order execution
combined with execute fences.
v5: Call sw_fence_fini for our dummy request (Matthew)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228220639.3173-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      b5773a36
  33. 28 2月, 2019 2 次提交