The current reset unnecessarily clears flags and makes pointless
calculations.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

page is guaranteed to be set before it is read with or without the
initialisation.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

zonelist here is a copy of a struct field that is used once.  Ditch it.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The number of zones skipped to a zone expiring its fair zone allocation
quota is irrelevant.  Convert to bool.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

alloc_flags is a bitmask of flags but it is signed which does not
necessarily generate the best code depending on the compiler.  Even
without an impact, it makes more sense that this be unsigned.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pageblocks have an associated bitmap to store migrate types and whether
the pageblock should be skipped during compaction.  The bitmap may be
associated with a memory section or a zone but the zone is looked up
unconditionally.  The compiler should optimise this away automatically
so this is a cosmetic patch only in many cases.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__dec_zone_state is cheaper to use for removing an order-0 page as it
has fewer conditions to check.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optiter-v1r20              decstat-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               382.00 (  0.00%)           381.00 (  0.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               282.00 (  0.00%)           275.00 (  2.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               233.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.72%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              188.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  1.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              182.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 (  1.65%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              177.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  1.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             175.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             184.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 (  1.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             197.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            203.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            209.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            214.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            218.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The page allocator iterates through a zonelist for zones that match the
addressing limitations and nodemask of the caller but many allocations
will not be restricted.  Despite this, there is always functional call
overhead which builds up.

This patch inlines the optimistic basic case and only calls the iterator
function for the complex case.  A hindrance was the fact that
cpuset_current_mems_allowed is used in the fastpath as the allowed
nodemask even though all nodes are allowed on most systems.  The patch
handles this by only considering cpuset_current_mems_allowed if a cpuset
exists.  As well as being faster in the fast-path, this removes some
junk in the slowpath.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statinline-v1r20              optiter-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               412.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               301.00 (  0.00%)           282.00 (  6.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               247.00 (  0.00%)           233.00 (  5.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               215.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  5.58%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              199.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  5.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              191.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 (  4.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              187.00 (  0.00%)           177.00 (  5.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             185.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  5.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             193.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  4.66%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             207.00 (  0.00%)           197.00 (  4.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            213.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  4.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            220.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            226.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            229.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 (  4.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           229.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  4.37%)

perf indicated that next_zones_zonelist disappeared in the profile and
__next_zones_zonelist did not appear.  This is expected as the
micro-benchmark would hit the inlined fast-path every time.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function.  Make it
static and inline.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statbranch-v1r20           statinline-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               419.00 (  0.00%)           412.00 (  1.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               305.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               250.00 (  0.00%)           247.00 (  1.20%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               219.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              195.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  2.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              191.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  2.09%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             189.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 (  2.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             198.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             210.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  1.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            216.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  1.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            221.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 (  0.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            227.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

zone_statistics has more branches than it really needs to take an
unlikely GFP flag into account.  Reduce the number and annotate the
unlikely flag.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      nocompound-v1r10           statbranch-v1r10
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               417.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( -0.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               308.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 (  0.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               253.00 (  0.00%)           250.00 (  1.19%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               221.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.90%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              205.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  0.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 (  2.01%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  1.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             200.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  1.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           210.00 (  0.94%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            231.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 (  1.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            234.00 (  0.00%)           232.00 (  0.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           234.00 (  0.00%)           232.00 (  0.85%)
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The PageAnon check always checks for compound_head but this is a
relatively expensive check if the caller already knows the page is a
head page.  This patch creates a helper and uses it in the page free
path which only operates on head pages.

With this patch and "Only check PageCompound for high-order pages", the
performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                               vanilla           nocompound-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               425.00 (  0.00%)           417.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               313.00 (  0.00%)           308.00 (  1.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               257.00 (  0.00%)           253.00 (  1.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               224.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              208.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              195.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  1.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             192.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             204.00 (  0.00%)           200.00 (  1.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             213.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           225.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            230.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( -0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                215.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 ( 11.16%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           136.00 ( 10.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                119.00 (  0.00%)           107.00 ( 10.08%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            96.00 (  9.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            87.00 ( 10.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                91.00 (  0.00%)            83.00 (  8.79%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            81.00 (  8.99%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               88.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  9.09%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              106.00 (  0.00%)            95.00 ( 10.38%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              116.00 (  0.00%)           111.00 (  4.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             133.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             136.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  4.41%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             138.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.80%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)

There is a sizable boost to the free allocator performance.  While there
is an apparent boost on the allocation side, it's likely a co-incidence
or due to the patches slightly reducing cache footprint.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Another year, another round of page allocator optimisations focusing
this time on the alloc and free fast paths.  This should be of help to
workloads that are allocator-intensive from kernel space where the cost
of zeroing is not nceessraily incurred.

The series is motivated by the observation that page alloc
microbenchmarks on multiple machines regressed between 3.12.44 and 4.4.
Second, there is discussions before LSF/MM considering the possibility
of adding another page allocator which is potentially hazardous but a
patch series improving performance is better than whining.

After the series is applied, there are still hazards.  In the free
paths, the debugging checking and page zone/pageblock lookups dominate
but there was not an obvious solution to that.  In the alloc path, the
major contributers are dealing with zonelists, new page preperation, the
fair zone allocation and numerous statistic updates.  The fair zone
allocator is removed by the per-node LRU series if that gets merged so
it's nor a major concern at the moment.

On normal userspace benchmarks, there is little impact as the zeroing
cost is significant but it's visible

  aim9
                                 4.6.0-rc3             4.6.0-rc3
                                   vanilla         deferalloc-v3
  Min      page_test   828693.33 (  0.00%)   887060.00 (  7.04%)
  Min      brk_test   4847266.67 (  0.00%)  4966266.67 (  2.45%)
  Min      exec_test     1271.00 (  0.00%)     1275.67 (  0.37%)
  Min      fork_test    12371.75 (  0.00%)    12380.00 (  0.07%)

The overall impact on a page allocator microbenchmark for a range of orders
and number of pages allocated in a batch is

                                            4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                               vanilla            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               428.00 (  0.00%)           316.00 ( 26.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               314.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( 26.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               256.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 ( 25.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               222.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( 25.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              207.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 ( 25.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              197.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 24.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 ( 25.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 ( 25.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             203.00 (  0.00%)           153.00 ( 24.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            221.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 ( 20.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            232.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 ( 20.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 ( 20.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           236.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 ( 20.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1               519.00 (  0.00%)           450.00 ( 13.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2               391.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 14.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4               313.00 (  0.00%)           268.00 ( 14.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8               277.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-16              256.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 14.84%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-32              252.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 ( 15.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-64              244.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 ( 15.57%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-128             244.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-256             243.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 14.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-512             245.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 ( 14.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1024            248.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 ( 13.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2048            253.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 ( 13.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4096            258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8192            261.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 ( 12.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1               560.00 (  0.00%)           753.00 (-34.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2               424.00 (  0.00%)           351.00 ( 17.22%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4               339.00 (  0.00%)           393.00 (-15.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-8               298.00 (  0.00%)           246.00 ( 17.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-16              276.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( 17.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-32              271.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 ( 18.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-64              264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-128             264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-256             264.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 17.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-512             269.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( 17.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1024            279.00 (  0.00%)           230.00 ( 17.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2048            283.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4096            285.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 16.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1               629.00 (  0.00%)           505.00 ( 19.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2               472.00 (  0.00%)           374.00 ( 20.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-4               383.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 ( 21.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-8               341.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 21.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-16              316.00 (  0.00%)           248.00 ( 21.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-32              308.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-64              305.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-128             308.00 (  0.00%)           244.00 ( 20.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-256             317.00 (  0.00%)           249.00 ( 21.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-512             327.00 (  0.00%)           256.00 ( 21.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1024            331.00 (  0.00%)           261.00 ( 21.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2048            333.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 20.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1               767.00 (  0.00%)           572.00 ( 25.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-2               578.00 (  0.00%)           429.00 ( 25.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-4               474.00 (  0.00%)           346.00 ( 27.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-8               422.00 (  0.00%)           310.00 ( 26.54%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-16              399.00 (  0.00%)           295.00 ( 26.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-32              392.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-64              394.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-128             405.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 ( 24.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-256             417.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 23.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-512             425.00 (  0.00%)           326.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1024            426.00 (  0.00%)           329.00 ( 22.77%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                216.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 17.59%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( 17.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                120.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 ( 17.50%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 ( 19.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 ( 17.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                92.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 ( 17.39%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 ( 16.85%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               89.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 ( 17.98%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              107.00 (  0.00%)            90.00 ( 15.89%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              117.00 (  0.00%)           108.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             132.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 (  5.30%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             135.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 (  4.38%)
  Min      free-odr1-1                318.00 (  0.00%)           289.00 (  9.12%)
  Min      free-odr1-2                228.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  9.21%)
  Min      free-odr1-4                182.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  9.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-8                163.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 10.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-16               151.00 (  0.00%)           135.00 ( 10.60%)
  Min      free-odr1-32               146.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( 11.64%)
  Min      free-odr1-64               145.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( 10.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-128              148.00 (  0.00%)           134.00 (  9.46%)
  Min      free-odr1-256              148.00 (  0.00%)           137.00 (  7.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-512              151.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      free-odr1-1024             154.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  7.14%)
  Min      free-odr1-2048             156.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr1-4096             156.00 (  0.00%)           142.00 (  8.97%)
  Min      free-odr1-8192             156.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 ( 10.26%)
  Min      free-odr2-1                361.00 (  0.00%)           457.00 (-26.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-2                258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      free-odr2-4                208.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( -7.21%)
  Min      free-odr2-8                185.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 13.51%)
  Min      free-odr2-16               173.00 (  0.00%)           149.00 ( 13.87%)
  Min      free-odr2-32               166.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 ( 12.65%)
  Min      free-odr2-64               166.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 12.05%)
  Min      free-odr2-128              169.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 12.43%)
  Min      free-odr2-256              170.00 (  0.00%)           152.00 ( 10.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-512              177.00 (  0.00%)           156.00 ( 11.86%)
  Min      free-odr2-1024             182.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( 10.99%)
  Min      free-odr2-2048             181.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 11.60%)
  Min      free-odr2-4096             180.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 ( 11.67%)
  Min      free-odr3-1                431.00 (  0.00%)           367.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      free-odr3-2                306.00 (  0.00%)           259.00 ( 15.36%)
  Min      free-odr3-4                249.00 (  0.00%)           208.00 ( 16.47%)
  Min      free-odr3-8                224.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      free-odr3-16               208.00 (  0.00%)           176.00 ( 15.38%)
  Min      free-odr3-32               206.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 ( 15.53%)
  Min      free-odr3-64               210.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 15.24%)
  Min      free-odr3-128              215.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 ( 15.35%)
  Min      free-odr3-256              224.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 ( 15.62%)
  Min      free-odr3-512              232.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.95%)
  Min      free-odr3-1024             230.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.22%)
  Min      free-odr3-2048             229.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 ( 15.72%)
  Min      free-odr4-1                561.00 (  0.00%)           439.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      free-odr4-2                418.00 (  0.00%)           318.00 ( 23.92%)
  Min      free-odr4-4                339.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 20.65%)
  Min      free-odr4-8                299.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 20.07%)
  Min      free-odr4-16               289.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 19.03%)
  Min      free-odr4-32               291.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 19.24%)
  Min      free-odr4-64               298.00 (  0.00%)           238.00 ( 20.13%)
  Min      free-odr4-128              308.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 18.51%)
  Min      free-odr4-256              321.00 (  0.00%)           267.00 ( 16.82%)
  Min      free-odr4-512              327.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      free-odr4-1024             326.00 (  0.00%)           271.00 ( 16.87%)
  Min      total-odr0-1               644.00 (  0.00%)           494.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      total-odr0-2               466.00 (  0.00%)           356.00 ( 23.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-4               376.00 (  0.00%)           291.00 ( 22.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-8               328.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 23.48%)
  Min      total-odr0-16              304.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 23.03%)
  Min      total-odr0-32              289.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 22.49%)
  Min      total-odr0-64              282.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 22.70%)
  Min      total-odr0-128             280.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 ( 22.86%)
  Min      total-odr0-256             310.00 (  0.00%)           243.00 ( 21.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-512             329.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 ( 17.02%)
  Min      total-odr0-1024            346.00 (  0.00%)           290.00 ( 16.18%)
  Min      total-odr0-2048            357.00 (  0.00%)           304.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      total-odr0-4096            367.00 (  0.00%)           315.00 ( 14.17%)
  Min      total-odr0-8192            372.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 ( 14.78%)
  Min      total-odr0-16384           373.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 14.48%)
  Min      total-odr1-1               838.00 (  0.00%)           739.00 ( 11.81%)
  Min      total-odr1-2               619.00 (  0.00%)           543.00 ( 12.28%)
  Min      total-odr1-4               495.00 (  0.00%)           433.00 ( 12.53%)
  Min      total-odr1-8               440.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      total-odr1-16              407.00 (  0.00%)           353.00 ( 13.27%)
  Min      total-odr1-32              398.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 14.32%)
  Min      total-odr1-64              389.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 13.62%)
  Min      total-odr1-128             392.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 13.01%)
  Min      total-odr1-256             391.00 (  0.00%)           344.00 ( 12.02%)
  Min      total-odr1-512             396.00 (  0.00%)           349.00 ( 11.87%)
  Min      total-odr1-1024            402.00 (  0.00%)           357.00 ( 11.19%)
  Min      total-odr1-2048            409.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 ( 11.00%)
  Min      total-odr1-4096            414.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 11.59%)
  Min      total-odr1-8192            417.00 (  0.00%)           369.00 ( 11.51%)
  Min      total-odr2-1               921.00 (  0.00%)          1210.00 (-31.38%)
  Min      total-odr2-2               682.00 (  0.00%)           576.00 ( 15.54%)
  Min      total-odr2-4               547.00 (  0.00%)           616.00 (-12.61%)
  Min      total-odr2-8               483.00 (  0.00%)           406.00 ( 15.94%)
  Min      total-odr2-16              449.00 (  0.00%)           376.00 ( 16.26%)
  Min      total-odr2-32              437.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 16.25%)
  Min      total-odr2-64              431.00 (  0.00%)           363.00 ( 15.78%)
  Min      total-odr2-128             433.00 (  0.00%)           365.00 ( 15.70%)
  Min      total-odr2-256             434.00 (  0.00%)           371.00 ( 14.52%)
  Min      total-odr2-512             446.00 (  0.00%)           379.00 ( 15.02%)
  Min      total-odr2-1024            461.00 (  0.00%)           392.00 ( 14.97%)
  Min      total-odr2-2048            464.00 (  0.00%)           395.00 ( 14.87%)
  Min      total-odr2-4096            465.00 (  0.00%)           398.00 ( 14.41%)
  Min      total-odr3-1              1060.00 (  0.00%)           872.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      total-odr3-2               778.00 (  0.00%)           633.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-4               632.00 (  0.00%)           510.00 ( 19.30%)
  Min      total-odr3-8               565.00 (  0.00%)           452.00 ( 20.00%)
  Min      total-odr3-16              524.00 (  0.00%)           424.00 ( 19.08%)
  Min      total-odr3-32              514.00 (  0.00%)           415.00 ( 19.26%)
  Min      total-odr3-64              515.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-128             523.00 (  0.00%)           426.00 ( 18.55%)
  Min      total-odr3-256             541.00 (  0.00%)           438.00 ( 19.04%)
  Min      total-odr3-512             559.00 (  0.00%)           451.00 ( 19.32%)
  Min      total-odr3-1024            561.00 (  0.00%)           456.00 ( 18.72%)
  Min      total-odr3-2048            562.00 (  0.00%)           459.00 ( 18.33%)
  Min      total-odr4-1              1328.00 (  0.00%)          1011.00 ( 23.87%)
  Min      total-odr4-2               997.00 (  0.00%)           747.00 ( 25.08%)
  Min      total-odr4-4               813.00 (  0.00%)           615.00 ( 24.35%)
  Min      total-odr4-8               721.00 (  0.00%)           550.00 ( 23.72%)
  Min      total-odr4-16              689.00 (  0.00%)           529.00 ( 23.22%)
  Min      total-odr4-32              683.00 (  0.00%)           528.00 ( 22.69%)
  Min      total-odr4-64              692.00 (  0.00%)           531.00 ( 23.27%)
  Min      total-odr4-128             713.00 (  0.00%)           556.00 ( 22.02%)
  Min      total-odr4-256             738.00 (  0.00%)           586.00 ( 20.60%)
  Min      total-odr4-512             753.00 (  0.00%)           595.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      total-odr4-1024            752.00 (  0.00%)           600.00 ( 20.21%)

This patch (of 27):

order-0 pages by definition cannot be compound so avoid the check in the
fast path for those pages.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use unlikely(order) in free_pages_prepare(), per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Right now the oom reaper will clear TIF_MEMDIE only for tasks which were
successfully reaped.  This is the safest option because we know that
such an oom victim would only block forward progress of the oom killer
without a good reason because it is highly unlikely it would release
much more memory.  Basically most of its memory has been already torn
down.

We can relax this assumption to catch more corner cases though.

The first obvious one is when the oom victim clears its mm and gets
stuck later on.  oom_reaper would back of on find_lock_task_mm returning
NULL.  We can safely try to clear TIF_MEMDIE in this case because such a
task would be ignored by the oom killer anyway.  The flag would be
cleared by that time already most of the time anyway.

The less obvious one is when the oom reaper fails due to mmap_sem
contention.  Even if we clear TIF_MEMDIE for this task then it is not
very likely that we would select another task too easily because we
haven't reaped the last victim and so it would be still the #1
candidate.  There is a rare race condition possible when the current
victim terminates before the next select_bad_process but considering
that oom_reap_task had retried several times before giving up then this
sounds like a borderline thing.

After this patch we should have a guarantee that the OOM killer will not
be block for unbounded amount of time for most cases.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Raushaniya Maksudova <rmaksudova@parallels.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If either the current task is already killed or PF_EXITING or a selected
task is PF_EXITING then the oom killer is suppressed and so is the oom
reaper.  This patch adds try_oom_reaper which checks the given task and
queues it for the oom reaper if that is safe to be done meaning that the
task doesn't share the mm with an alive process.

This might help to release the memory pressure while the task tries to
exit.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix nommu build]
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Raushaniya Maksudova <rmaksudova@parallels.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__alloc_pages_may_oom is the central place to decide when the
out_of_memory should be invoked.  This is a good approach for most
checks there because they are page allocator specific and the allocation
fails right after for all of them.

The notable exception is GFP_NOFS context which is faking
did_some_progress and keep the page allocator looping even though there
couldn't have been any progress from the OOM killer.  This patch doesn't
change this behavior because we are not ready to allow those allocation
requests to fail yet (and maybe we will face the reality that we will
never manage to safely fail these request).  Instead __GFP_FS check is
moved down to out_of_memory and prevent from OOM victim selection there.
There are two reasons for that

	- OOM notifiers might release some memory even from this context
	  as none of the registered notifier seems to be FS related
	- this might help a dying thread to get an access to memory
          reserves and move on which will make the behavior more
          consistent with the case when the task gets killed from a
          different context.

Keep a comment in __alloc_pages_may_oom to make sure we do not forget
how GFP_NOFS is special and that we really want to do something about
it.

Note to the current oom_notifier users:

The observable difference for you is that oom notifiers cannot depend on
any fs locks because we could deadlock.  Not that this would be allowed
today because that would just lockup machine in most of the cases and
ruling out the OOM killer along the way.  Another difference is that
callbacks might be invoked sooner now because GFP_NOFS is a weaker
reclaim context and so there could be reclaimable memory which is just
not reachable now.  That would require GFP_NOFS only loads which are
really rare and more importantly the observable result would be dropping
of reconstructible object and potential performance drop which is not
such a big deal when we are struggling to fulfill other important
allocation requests.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Raushaniya Maksudova <rmaksudova@parallels.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE specifies the default value for the
memory hotplug onlining policy.  Add a command line parameter to make it
possible to override the default.  It may come handy for debug and
testing purposes.
Signed-off-by: NVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This patchset continues the work I started with commit 31bc3858
("memory-hotplug: add automatic onlining policy for the newly added
memory").

Initially I was going to stop there and bring the policy setting logic
to userspace.  I met two issues on this way:

 1) It is possible to have memory hotplugged at boot (e.g.  with QEMU).
    These blocks stay offlined if we turn the onlining policy on by
    userspace.

 2) My attempt to bring this policy setting to systemd failed, systemd
    maintainers suggest to change the default in kernel or ...  to use
    tmpfiles.d to alter the policy (which looks like a hack to me):
        https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2938

Here I suggest to add a config option to set the default value for the
policy and a kernel command line parameter to make the override.

This patch (of 2):

Introduce config option to set the default value for memory hotplug
onlining policy (/sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks).  The
reason one would want to turn this option on are to have early onlining
for hotpluggable memory available at boot and to not require any
userspace actions to make memory hotplug work.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak Kconfig text]
Signed-off-by: NVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I've just discovered that the useful-sounding has_transparent_hugepage()
is actually an architecture-dependent minefield: on some arches it only
builds if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y, on others it's also there when
not, but on some of those (arm and arm64) it then gives the wrong
answer; and on mips alone it's marked __init, which would crash if
called later (but so far it has not been called later).

Straighten this out: make it available to all configs, with a sensible
default in asm-generic/pgtable.h, removing its definitions from those
arches (arc, arm, arm64, sparc, tile) which are served by the default,
adding #define has_transparent_hugepage has_transparent_hugepage to
those (mips, powerpc, s390, x86) which need to override the default at
runtime, and removing the __init from mips (but maybe that kind of code
should be avoided after init: set a static variable the first time it's
called).
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>		[arch/arc]
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>	[arch/s390]
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Whatever huge pagecache implementation we go with, file rmap locking
must be added to anon rmap locking, when mremap's move_page_tables()
finds a pmd_trans_huge pmd entry: a simple change, let's do it now.

Factor out take_rmap_locks() and drop_rmap_locks() to handle the locking
for make move_ptes() and move_page_tables(), and delete the
VM_BUG_ON_VMA which rejected vm_file and required anon_vma.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Remove move_huge_pmd()'s redundant new_vma arg: all it was used for was
a VM_NOHUGEPAGE check on new_vma flags, but the new_vma is cloned from
the old vma, so a trans_huge_pmd in the new_vma will be as acceptable as
it was in the old vma, alignment and size permitting.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Provide /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh to force an immediate update of
per-cpu into global vmstats: useful to avoid a sleep(2) or whatever
before checking counts when testing.  Originally added to work around a
bug which left counts stranded indefinitely on a cpu going idle (an
inaccuracy magnified when small below-batch numbers represent "huge"
amounts of memory), but I believe that bug is now fixed: nonetheless,
this is still a useful knob.

Its schedule_on_each_cpu() is probably too expensive just to fold into
reading /proc/meminfo itself: give this mode 0600 to prevent abuse.
Allow a write or a read to do the same: nothing to read, but "grep -h
Shmem /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh /proc/meminfo" is convenient.  Oh, and
since global_page_state() itself is careful to disguise any underflow as
0, hack in an "Invalid argument" and pr_warn() if a counter is negative
after the refresh - this helped to fix a misaccounting of
NR_ISOLATED_FILE in my migration code.

But on recent kernels, I find that NR_ALLOC_BATCH and NR_PAGES_SCANNED
often go negative some of the time.  I have not yet worked out why, but
have no evidence that it's actually harmful.  Punt for the moment by
just ignoring the anomaly on those.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Although shmem_fault() has been careful to count a major fault to vm_mm,
shmem_getpage_gfp() has been careless in charging a remote access fault
to current->mm owner's memcg instead of to vma->vm_mm owner's memcg:
that is inconsistent with all the mem_cgroup charging on remote access
faults in mm/memory.c.

Fix it by passing fault_mm along with fault_type to
shmem_get_page_gfp(); but in that case, now knowing the right mm, it's
better for it to handle the PGMAJFAULT updates itself.

And let's keep this clutter out of most callers' way: change the common
shmem_getpage() wrapper to hide fault_mm and fault_type as well as gfp.
Signed-off-by: NAndres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Make a few cleanups in mm/shmem.c, before going on to complicate it.

shmem_alloc_page() will become more complicated: we can't afford to to
have that complication duplicated between a CONFIG_NUMA version and a
!CONFIG_NUMA version, so rearrange the #ifdef'ery there to yield a
single shmem_swapin() and a single shmem_alloc_page().

Yes, it's a shame to inflict the horrid pseudo-vma on non-NUMA
configurations, but eliminating it is a larger cleanup: I have an
alloc_pages_mpol() patchset not yet ready - mpol handling is subtle and
bug-prone, and changed yet again since my last version.

Move __SetPageLocked, __SetPageSwapBacked from shmem_getpage_gfp() to
shmem_alloc_page(): that SwapBacked flag will be useful in future, to
help to distinguish different cases appropriately.

And the SGP_DIRTY variant of SGP_CACHE is hard to understand and of
little use (IIRC it dates back to when shmem_getpage() returned the page
unlocked): kill it and do the necessary in shmem_file_read_iter().

But an arm64 build then complained that info may be uninitialized (where
shmem_getpage_gfp() deletes a freshly alloced page beyond eof), and
advancing to an "sgp <= SGP_CACHE" test jogged it back to reality.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

v3.16 commit 07a42788 ("mm: shmem: avoid atomic operation during
shmem_getpage_gfp") rightly replaced one instance of SetPageSwapBacked
by __SetPageSwapBacked, pointing out that the newly allocated page is
not yet visible to other users (except speculative get_page_unless_zero-
ers, who may not update page flags before their further checks).

That was part of a series in which Mel was focused on tmpfs profiles:
but almost all SetPageSwapBacked uses can be so optimized, with the same
justification.

Remove ClearPageSwapBacked from __read_swap_cache_async() error path:
it's not an error to free a page with PG_swapbacked set.

Follow a convention of __SetPageLocked, __SetPageSwapBacked instead of
doing it differently in different places; but that's for tidiness - if
the ordering actually mattered, we should not be using the __variants.

There's probably scope for further __SetPageFlags in other places, but
SwapBacked is the one I'm interested in at the moment.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Konstantin Khlebnikov pointed out (nearly four years ago, when lumpy
reclaim was removed) that lru_size can be updated by -nr_taken once per
call to isolate_lru_pages(), instead of page by page.

Update it inside isolate_lru_pages(), or at its two callsites? I chose
to update it at the callsites, rearranging and grouping the updates by
nr_taken and nr_scanned together in both.

With one exception, mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(,lru,) is then used where
__mod_zone_page_state(,NR_LRU_BASE+lru,) is used; and we shall be adding
some more calls in a future commit.  Make the code a little smaller and
simpler by incorporating stat update in lru_size update.

The exception was move_active_pages_to_lru(), which aggregated the
pgmoved stat update separately from the individual lru_size updates; but
I still think this a simplification worth making.

However, the __mod_zone_page_state is not peculiar to mem_cgroups: so
better use the name update_lru_size, calls mem_cgroup_update_lru_size
when CONFIG_MEMCG.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Though debug kernels have a VM_BUG_ON to help protect from misaccounting
lru_size, non-debug kernels are liable to wrap it around: and then the
vast unsigned long size draws page reclaim into a loop of repeatedly
doing nothing on an empty list, without even a cond_resched().

That soft lockup looks confusingly like an over-busy reclaim scenario,
with lots of contention on the lru_lock in shrink_inactive_list(): yet
has a totally different origin.

Help differentiate with a custom warning in
mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(), even in non-debug kernels; and reset the
size to avoid the lockup.  But the particular bug which suggested this
change was mine alone, and since fixed.

Make it a WARN_ONCE: the first occurrence is the most informative, a
flurry may follow, yet even when rate-limited little more is learnt.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Nobody uses it.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

node_page_state() manually adds statistics per each zone and returns
total value for all zones.  Whenever we add a new zone, we need to
consider this function and it's really troublesome.  Make it handle all
zones by itself.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

nr_free_highpages() manually adds statistics per each highmem zone and
returns a total value for them.  Whenever we add a new highmem zone, we
need to consider this function and it's really troublesome.  Make it
handle all highmem zones by itself.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
accurate statistics.  And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA will be
introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too.  So, instead of
manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check
whether the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be
treated as highmem.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
accurate calculation of dirty pages.  And, in following patches,
ZONE_CMA will be introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too.  So,
instead of manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and
check whether the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which
can be treated as highmem.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.

mark_free_pages() iterates requested zone's pfn range and unset all
range's bitmap first.  And then it marks freepages in a zone to the
bitmap.  If there is an overlapping zone, above unset could clear
previous marked bit and reference to this bitmap in the future will
cause the problem.  To prevent it, this patch adds a zone check in
mark_free_pages().
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.

There are one place in page_owner.c that iterates pfn range and it
doesn't consider this overlapping.  Add it.

Without this patch, above system could over count early allocated page
number before page_owner is activated.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to care this overlapping when iterating pfn range.

There are two places in vmstat.c that iterates pfn range and they don't
consider this overlapping.  Add it.

Without this patch, above system could over count pageblock number on a
zone.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__offline_isolated_pages() and test_pages_isolated() are used by memory
hotplug.  These functions require that range is in a single zone but
there is no code to do this because memory hotplug checks it before
calling these functions.  To avoid confusing future user of these
functions, this patch adds comments to them.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This patchset deals with some problematic sites that iterate pfn ranges.

There is a system thats node's pfns are overlapped as follows:

  -----pfn-------->
  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2

Therefore, we need to take care of this overlapping when iterating pfn
range.

I audit many iterating sites that uses pfn_valid(), pfn_valid_within(),
zone_start_pfn and etc.  and others looks safe to me.  This is a
preparation step for a new CMA implementation, ZONE_CMA
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/12/95), because it would be easily
overlapped with other zones.  But, zone overlap check is also needed for
the general case so I send it separately.

This patch (of 5):

alloc_gigantic_page() uses alloc_contig_range() and this requires that
the requested range is in a single zone.  To satisfy this requirement,
add this check to pfn_range_valid_gigantic().
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It's huge.  Uninlining it saves 206 bytes per callsite.  Shaves 4924
bytes from the x86_64 allmodconfig vmlinux.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

is_highmem() can be simplified by use of is_highmem_idx().  This patch
removes redundant code and will make it easier to maintain if the zone
policy is changed or a new zone is added.

(akpm: saves me 25 bytes of text per is_highmem() callsite)
Signed-off-by: NChanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The goal of direct compaction is to quickly make a high-order page
available for the pending allocation.  Within an aligned block of pages
of desired order, a single allocated page that cannot be isolated for
migration means that the block cannot fully merge to a buddy page that
would satisfy the allocation request.  Therefore we can reduce the
allocation stall by skipping the rest of the block immediately on
isolation failure.  For async compaction, this also means a higher
chance of succeeding until it detects contention.

We however shouldn't completely sacrifice the second objective of
compaction, which is to reduce overal long-term memory fragmentation.
As a compromise, perform the eager skipping only in direct async
compaction, while sync compaction (including kcompactd) remains
thorough.

Testing was done using stress-highalloc from mmtests, configured for
order-4 GFP_KERNEL allocations:

                                 4.6-rc1               4.6-rc1
                                  before                 after
  Success 1 Min         24.00 (  0.00%)       27.00 (-12.50%)
  Success 1 Mean        30.20 (  0.00%)       31.60 ( -4.64%)
  Success 1 Max         37.00 (  0.00%)       35.00 (  5.41%)
  Success 2 Min         42.00 (  0.00%)       32.00 ( 23.81%)
  Success 2 Mean        44.00 (  0.00%)       44.80 ( -1.82%)
  Success 2 Max         48.00 (  0.00%)       52.00 ( -8.33%)
  Success 3 Min         91.00 (  0.00%)       92.00 ( -1.10%)
  Success 3 Mean        92.20 (  0.00%)       92.80 ( -0.65%)
  Success 3 Max         94.00 (  0.00%)       93.00 (  1.06%)

We can see that success rates are unaffected by the skipping.

                4.6-rc1     4.6-rc1
                 before       after
  User         2587.42     2566.53
  System        482.89      471.20
  Elapsed      1395.68     1382.00

Times are not so useful metric for this benchmark as main portion is the
interfering kernel builds, but results do hint at reduced system times.

                                      4.6-rc1     4.6-rc1
                                       before       after
  Direct pages scanned                163614      159608
  Kswapd pages scanned               2070139     2078790
  Kswapd pages reclaimed             2061707     2069757
  Direct pages reclaimed              163354      159505

Reduced direct reclaim was unintended, but could be explained by more
successful first attempt at (async) direct compaction, which is
attempted before the first reclaim attempt in __alloc_pages_slowpath().

  Compaction stalls                    33052       39853
  Compaction success                   12121       19773
  Compaction failures                  20931       20079

Compaction is indeed more successful, and thus less likely to get
deferred, so there are also more direct compaction stalls.

  Page migrate success               3781876     3326819
  Page migrate failure                 45817       41774
  Compaction pages isolated          7868232     6941457
  Compaction migrate scanned       168160492   127269354
  Compaction migrate prescanned            0           0
  Compaction free scanned         2522142582  2326342620
  Compaction free direct alloc             0           0
  Compaction free dir. all. miss           0           0
  Compaction cost                       5252        4476

The patch reduces migration scanned pages by 25% thanks to the eager
skipping.

[hughd@google.com: prevent nr_isolated_* from going negative]
Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>