- 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
There is a lot of broken firmware out there that don't really expose the information the kernel requires when it comes with dealing with GICv2: (1) Firmware that only describes the first 4kB of GICv2 (2) Firmware that describe 128kB of CPU interface, while the usable portion of the address space is between 60 and 68kB So far, we only deal with (2). But we have platforms exhibiting behaviour (1), resulting in two sub-cases: (a) The GIC is occupying 8kB, as required by the GICv2 architecture (b) It is actually spread 128kB, and this is likely to be a version of (2) This patch tries to work around both (a) and (b) by poking at the outside of the described memory region, and try to work out what is actually there. This is of course unsafe, and should only be enabled if there is no way to otherwise fix the DT provided by the firmware (we provide a "irqchip.gicv2_force_probe" option to that effect). Note that for the time being, we restrict ourselves to GICv2 implementations provided by ARM, since there I have no knowledge of an alternative implementations. This could be relaxed if such an implementation comes to light on a broken platform. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bhumika Goyal 提交于
Make this const as it is only used in a copy operation. Done using Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: NBhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code about this. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818083925.10108-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com
-
- 02 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Devices that expose their interrupt status registers via system registers (e.g. Statistical profiling, CPU PMU, DynamIQ PMU, arch timer, vgic (although unused by Linux), ...) rely on a context synchronising operation on the CPU to ensure that the updated status register is visible to the CPU when handling the interrupt. This usually happens as a result of taking the IRQ exception in the first place, but there are two race scenarios where this isn't the case. For example, let's say we have two peripherals (X and Y), where Y uses a system register for its interrupt status. Case 1: 1. CPU takes an IRQ exception as a result of X raising an interrupt 2. Y then raises its interrupt line, but the update to its system register is not yet visible to the CPU 3. The GIC decides to expose Y's interrupt number first in the Ack register 4. The CPU runs the IRQ handler for Y, but the status register is stale Case 2: 1. CPU takes an IRQ exception as a result of X raising an interrupt 2. CPU reads the interrupt number for X from the Ack register and runs its IRQ handler 3. Y raises its interrupt line and the Ack register is updated, but again, the update to its system register is not yet visible to the CPU. 4. Since the GIC drivers poll the Ack register, we read Y's interrupt number and run its handler without a context synchronisation operation, therefore seeing the stale register value. In either case, we run the risk of missing an IRQ. This patch solves the problem by ensuring that we execute an ISB in the GIC drivers prior to invoking the interrupt handler. This is already the case for GICv3 and EOIMode 1 (the usual case for the host). Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于
If the GIC cannot map an IRQ via irq_domain_ops->alloc(), it doesn't return an error code. This can cause a problem with drivers, where it thinks it has successfully got an IRQ for the device, but requesting the same ends up failure with -ENOSYS (as the IRQ's chip is not set). Fixes: commit 9a1091ef ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.") Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
When the state names got added a script was used to add the extra argument to the calls. The script basically converted the state constant to a string, but the cleanup to convert these strings into meaningful ones did not happen. Replace all the useless strings with 'subsys/xxx/yyy:state' strings which are used in all the other places already. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161221192112.085444152@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 20 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
It really looks bad without a newline. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Baoyou Xie 提交于
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:917:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'gic_init_physaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. so this patch marks this function with 'static'. Signed-off-by: NBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The BL switcher code manipulates the logical/physical CPU mapping, forcing a lock to be taken on the IPI path. With an IPI heavy load, this single lock becomes contended. But when CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER is not enabled, there is no reason to take this lock at all since the CPU mapping is immutable. This patch allows the lock to be entierely removed when BL_SWITCHER is not enabled (which is the case in most configurations), leading to a small improvement of "perf bench sched pipe" (measured on an 8 core AMD Seattle system): Before: 101370 ops/sec After: 103680 ops/sec Take this opportunity to remove a useless lock being taken when handling an interrupt on a secondary GIC. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
On systems where a single CPU is present, the GIC may not support having SGIs delivered to a target list. In that case, we use the self-SGI mechanism to allow the interrupt to be delivered locally. Tested-by: NFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 14 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Cochran 提交于
More or less straightforward, although this driver sports some very interesting SMP setup code. Regarding the callback ordering, this deleted comment is interesting: ... the GIC needs to be up before the ARM generic timers. That comment is half baken as the same requirement is true for perf. Signed-off-by: NRichard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAnna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: rt@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160713153333.069777215@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 6月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
Add a platform driver to support non-root GICs that require runtime power-management. Currently, only non-root GICs are supported because the functions, smp_cross_call() and set_handle_irq(), that need to be called for a root controller are located in the __init section and so cannot be called by the platform driver. The GIC platform driver re-uses many functions from the existing GIC driver including some functions to save and restore the GIC context during power transitions. The functions for saving and restoring the GIC context are currently only defined if CONFIG_CPU_PM is enabled and to ensure that these functions are always defined when the platform driver is enabled, a dependency on CONFIG_ARM_GIC_PM (which selects the platform driver) has been added. In order to re-use the private GIC initialisation code, a new public function, gic_of_init_child(), has been added which calls various private functions to initialise the GIC. This is different from the existing gic_of_init() because it only supports non-root GICs (ie. does not call smp_cross_call() is set_handle_irq()) and is not located in the __init section (so can be used by platform drivers). Furthermore, gic_of_init_child() dynamically allocates memory for the GIC chip data which is also different from gic_of_init(). There is no specific suspend handling for GICs registered as platform devices. Non-wakeup interrupts will be disabled by the kernel during late suspend, however, this alone will not power down the GIC if interrupts have been requested and not freed. Therefore, requestors of non-wakeup interrupts will need to free them on entering suspend in order to power-down the GIC. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
To support GICs that require runtime power management, it is necessary to add a platform driver, so that the probing of the chip can be deferred if resources, such as a power-domain, is not yet available. To prepare for adding a platform driver: 1. Drop the __init section from the gic_dist_config() so this can be re-used by the platform driver. 2. Add prototypes for functions required by the platform driver to the GIC header file so they can be re-used. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
For GICs that require runtime power-management it is necessary to populate the 'parent_device' member of the irqchip structure. In preparation for supporting such GICs, move the code that initialises the irqchip structure for a GIC into its own function called gic_init_chip() where the parent device pointer is also set. Instead of calling gic_init_chip() from within gic_init_bases(), move the calls to outside of this function, so that in the future we can avoid having to pass additional parameters to gic_init_bases() in order set the parent device pointer or set the name to a specific string. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
To re-use the code that initialises the GIC (found in __gic_init_bases()), from within a platform driver, it is necessary to move the code from the __init section so that it is always present and not removed. Unfortunately, it is not possible to simply drop the __init from the function declaration for __gic_init_bases() because it contains calls to set_smp_cross_call() and set_handle_irq() which are both located in the __init section. Fortunately, these calls are only required for the root controller and because the initial platform driver will only support non-root controllers that can be initialised later in the boot process, we can move these calls to another function. Move the bulk of the code from __gic_init_bases() to a new function called gic_init_bases() which is not located in the __init section and can be used by the platform driver. Update __gic_init_bases() to call gic_init_bases() and if necessary, set_smp_cross_call() and set_handle_irq(). Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 28 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long' argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an unsigned type. However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int' argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are 8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'. Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments. This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE() because there are probably still architecture specific users elsewhere. Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'. The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'. For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior. I was using this definition for testing: #define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \ unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO)) which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument. I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion (fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus asked me to send the whole thing again. [ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ] Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363 Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486 Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
Move the code that sets-up a GIC via device-tree into it's own function and add a generic function for GIC teardown that can be used for both device-tree and ACPI to unmap the GIC memory. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
Store the GIC configuration parameters in the GIC chip data structure. This will allow us to simplify the code by reducing the number of parameters passed between functions. Update the __gic_init_bases() function so that we only need to pass a pointer to the GIC chip data structure and no longer need to pass the GIC index in order to look-up the chip data. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
Instead of passing the GIC index to the save/restore functions pass a pointer to the GIC chip data. This will allow these save/restore functions to be re-used by a platform driver where the GIC chip data structure is allocated dynamically and so there is no applicable index for identifying the GIC. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
If the GIC initialisation fails, then currently we do not return an error or clean-up afterwards. Although for root controllers, this failure may be fatal anyway, for secondary controllers, it may not be fatal and so return an error on failure and clean-up. Update the functions gic_cpu_init() and gic_pm_init() to return an error instead of calling BUG() and perform any necessary clean-up. For non-banked GIC controllers, make sure that we free any memory allocated if we fail to initialise the IRQ domain. Please note that free_percpu() only frees memory if the pointer passed to it is not NULL and so it is unnecessary to check if both pointers are valid or not. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
There are only 3 differences (not including the name) in the definitions of the gic_chip and gic_eoimode1_chip structures. Instead of statically defining the gic_eoimode1_chip structure, remove it and populate the eoimode1 functions dynamically for the appropriate GIC irqchips. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
If we fail to map the address space for the GIC distributor or CPU interface, then don't attempt to initialise the chip, just WARN and return. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
When an IPI is generated by a CPU, the pattern looks roughly like: <write shared data> smp_wmb(); <write to GIC to signal SGI> On the receiving CPU we rely on the fact that, once we've taken the interrupt, then the freshly written shared data must be visible to us. Put another way, the CPU isn't going to speculate taking an interrupt. Unfortunately, this assumption turns out to be broken. Consider that CPUx wants to send an IPI to CPUy, which will cause CPUy to read some shared_data. Before CPUx has done anything, a random peripheral raises an IRQ to the GIC and the IRQ line on CPUy is raised. CPUy then takes the IRQ and starts executing the entry code, heading towards gic_handle_irq. Furthermore, let's assume that a bunch of the previous interrupts handled by CPUy were SGIs, so the branch predictor kicks in and speculates that irqnr will be <16 and we're likely to head into handle_IPI. The prefetcher then grabs a speculative copy of shared_data which contains a stale value. Meanwhile, CPUx gets round to updating shared_data and asking the GIC to send an SGI to CPUy. Internally, the GIC decides that the SGI is more important than the peripheral interrupt (which hasn't yet been ACKed) but doesn't need to do anything to CPUy, because the IRQ line is already raised. CPUy then reads the ACK register on the GIC, sees the SGI value which confirms the branch prediction and we end up with a stale shared_data value. This patch fixes the problem by adding an smp_rmb() to the IPI entry code in gic_handle_irq. As it turns out, the combination of a control dependency and an ISB instruction from the EOI in the GICv3 driver is enough to provide the ordering we need, so we add a comment there justifying the absence of an explicit smp_rmb(). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Julien Grall 提交于
For now, the firmware tables are parsed 2 times: once in the GIC drivers, the other timer when initializing the vGIC. It means code duplication and make more tedious to add the support for another firmware table (like ACPI). Introduce a new structure and set of helpers to get/set the virtual GIC information. Also fill up the structure for GICv2. Signed-off-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Julien Grall 提交于
The ACPI code requires to use global variables in order to collect information from the tables. For now, a single global variable is used, but more will be added in a subsequent patch. To make clear they are ACPI specific, gather all the information in a single structure. Signed-off-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristofer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 25 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When introducing the whole CPU feature detection framework, we lost the capability to detect a mismatched GIC configuration (using the GICv2 MMIO interface, but having the system register interface enabled). In order to solve this, use the new this_cpu_has_cap() helper. Also move the check to the CPU interface path in order to catch systems where the first CPU has been correctly configured, but the secondaries are not. Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs. It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other irqchips that rely on this behaviour (GICv2m and Marvell's ODMI controller). Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455894029-17270-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
EOImode1 is only used for the root controller and hence only the root controller uses the eoimode1 functions for handling interrupts. However, if the root controller supports EOImode1, then the EOImodeNS bit will be set for all GICs, enabling EOImode1. This is not what we want and this causes interrupts on non-root GICs to only be dropped in priority but never deactivated. Therefore, only set the EOImodeNS bit for the root controller. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
Setting the affinity of an IRQ, it only applicable for the root interrupt controller and so only populate this operator for the root controller. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 21 12月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Suravee Suthikulpanit 提交于
This patch introduces gicv2m_acpi_init(), which uses information in MADT GIC MSI frames structure to initialize GICv2m driver. It also exposes gicv2m_init() function, which simplifies callers to a single GICv2m init function. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NDuc Dang <dhdang@apm.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Suravee Suthikulpanit 提交于
Since there will be several places checking if fwnode.type is equal FWNODE_IRQCHIP, this patch adds a convenient function for this purpose. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 18 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR. With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need to get rid of the platform-specific include files. It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed. Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC. Suggested-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The GIC has no such thing as interrupt 1020: the last valid ID is 1019, and the range 1020-1023 is reserved - 1023 indicating that no interrupt is pending. So let's make sure we don't try to handle this ID. This bug has been in since the initial GIC code was introduced in 8ad68bbf ("[ARM] Add support for ARM RealView board"). Reported-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Instead of having the irqchip being a static struct, make it part of the per-instance data so we can assign it a dynamic name. This has the usable side effect of displaying the GIC with an instance number as GIC0, GIC1 ... GICn in /proc/interrupts, which is helpful when debugging cascaded GICs, such as on the ARM PB11MPCore. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The ARM RealView PB11MPCore reference design has some special bits in a system controller register to set up the GIC in one of three modes: legacy, new with DCC, new without DCC. The register is also used to enable FIQ. Since the platform will not boot unless this register is set up to "new with DCC" mode, we need a special quirk to be compiled-in for the RealView platforms. If we find the right compatible string on the GIC TestChip, we enable this quirk by looking up the system controller and enabling the special bits. We depend on the CONFIG_REALVIEW_DT Kconfig symbol as the old boardfile code has the same fix hardcoded, and this is only needed for the attempts to modernize the RealView code using device tree. After fixing this, the PB11MPCore boots with device tree only. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When using EOImode==1, we may mark interrupts as being forwarded to a virtual machine. In that case, the interrupt is left active while being passed to the VM. If we suspend the system before the VM has deactivated the interrupt, the active state will be lost (which may be very annoying, as this may result in spurious interrupts and a confused guest). To avoid this, save and restore the active state together with the rest of the GIC registers. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447701208-18150-5-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When restoring the GIC state (after a suspend/resume cycle, for example), the driver directly writes the 'enabled' state it has saved by accessing GICD_ISENABLERn, which performs an OR operation between the value present in the register and the value we write. If whatever code that has run before we reentered the kernel has enabled an interrupt that was previously disabled, we won't restore that disabled state. Making sure we first clear the register (by writting to GICD_ICENABLERn) before restoring the enabled state. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447701208-18150-4-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 14 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We are now left with only two use models for the GIC driver: - Via a firmware interface, which mandates a hierarchical domain, and the use of the 'translate' method - The legacy platforms, which assume irq==hwirq, hence not using the 'xlate' method. The logical conclusion is that we can now nuke the 'xlate' method altogether. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-14-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that the basic ACPI GSI code is irq domain aware, make sure that the ACPI support in the GIC doesn't pointlessly deviate from the DT path. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-13-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Since nobody is using gic_init_bases anymore outside of the GIC driver itself, let's do a bit of housekeeping and remove the now useless entry point. Only gic_init() is now exposed to the rest of the kernel for the benefit of legacy systems. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-12-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-