- 18 1月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Each osd message includes a layout structure, and for rbd it is always the same (at least for osd's in a given pool). Initialize a layout structure when an rbd_dev gets created and just copy that into osd requests for the rbd image. Replace an assertion that was done when initializing the layout structures with code that catches and handles anything that would trigger the assertion as soon as it is identified. This precludes that (bad) condition from ever occurring. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When rbd_do_request() has a request to process it initializes a ceph file layout structure and uses it to compute offsets and limits for the range of the request using ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(). The layout used is fixed, and is based on RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER (30). It sets the layout's object size and stripe unit to be 1 GB (2^30), and sets the stripe count to be 1. The job of ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() is to determine which of a sequence of objects will contain data covered by range, and within that object, at what offset the range starts. It also truncates the length of the range at the end of the selected object if necessary. This is needed for ceph fs, but for rbd it really serves no purpose. It does its own blocking of images into objects, echo of which is (1 << obj_order) in size, and as a result it ignores the "bno" value returned by ceph_calc_file_object_mapping(). In addition, by the point a request has reached this function, it is already destined for a single rbd object, and its length will not exceed that object's extent. Because of this, and because the mapping will result in blocking up the range using an integer multiple of the image's object order, ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() will never change the offset or length values defined by the request. In other words, this call is a big no-op for rbd data requests. There is one exception. We read the header object using this function, and in that case we will not have already limited the request size. However, the header is a single object (not a file or rbd image), and should not be broken into pieces anyway. So in fact we should *not* be calling ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() when operating on the header object. So... Don't call ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() in rbd_do_request(), because useless for image data and incorrect to do sofor the image header. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch gets rid of rbd_calc_raw_layout() by simply open coding it in its one caller. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This is the first in a series of patches aimed at eliminating the use of ceph_calc_raw_layout() by rbd. It simply pulls in a copy of that function and renames it rbd_calc_raw_layout(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The flags field of struct ceph_osd_req_op is never used, so just get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We now know that every of rbd_req_sync_op() passes an array of exactly one operation, as evidenced by all callers passing 1 as its num_op argument. So get rid of that argument, assuming a single op. Similarly, we now know that all callers of rbd_do_request() pass 1 as the num_op value, so that parameter can be eliminated as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Throughout the rbd code there are spots where it appears we can handle an osd request containing more than one osd request op. But that is only the way it appears. In fact, currently only one operation at a time can be supported, and supporting more than one will require much more than fleshing out the support that's there now. This patch changes names to make it perfectly clear that anywhere we're dealing with a block of ops, we're in fact dealing with exactly one of them. We'll be able to simplify some things as a result. When multiple op support is implemented, we can update things again accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Both ceph_osdc_alloc_request() and ceph_osdc_build_request() are provided an array of ceph osd request operations. Rather than just passing the number of operations in the array, the caller is required append an additional zeroed operation structure to signal the end of the array. All callers know the number of operations at the time these functions are called, so drop the silly zero entry and supply that number directly. As a result, get_num_ops() is no longer needed. This also means that ceph_osdc_alloc_request() never uses its ops argument, so that can be dropped. Also rbd_create_rw_ops() no longer needs to add one to reserve room for the additional op. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a num_op parameter to rbd_do_request() and rbd_req_sync_op() to indicate the number of entries in the array. The callers of these functions always know how many entries are in the array, so just pass that information down. This is in anticipation of eliminating the extra zero-filled entry in these ops arrays. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Only one of the two callers of ceph_osdc_alloc_request() provides page or bio data for its payload. And essentially all that function was doing with those arguments was assigning them to fields in the osd request structure. Simplify ceph_osdc_alloc_request() by having the caller take care of making those assignments Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The only thing ceph_osdc_alloc_request() really does with the flags value it is passed is assign it to the newly-created osd request structure. Do that in the caller instead. Both callers subsequently call ceph_osdc_build_request(), so have that function (instead of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()) issue a warning if a request comes through with neither the read nor write flags set. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osdc parameter to ceph_calc_raw_layout() is not used, so get rid of it. Consequently, the corresponding parameter in calc_layout() becomes unused, so get rid of that as well. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A snapshot id must be provided to ceph_calc_raw_layout() even though it is not needed at all for calculating the layout. Where the snapshot id *is* needed is when building the request message for an osd operation. Drop the snapid parameter from ceph_calc_raw_layout() and pass that value instead in ceph_osdc_build_request(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
ceph_calc_file_object_mapping() takes (among other things) a "file" offset and length, and based on the layout, determines the object number ("bno") backing the affected portion of the file's data and the offset into that object where the desired range begins. It also computes the size that should be used for the request--either the amount requested or something less if that would exceed the end of the object. This patch changes the input length parameter in this function so it is used only for input. That is, the argument will be passed by value rather than by address, so the value provided won't get updated by the function. The value would only get updated if the length would surpass the current object, and in that case the value it got updated to would be exactly that returned in *oxlen. Only one of the two callers is affected by this change. Update ceph_calc_raw_layout() so it records any updated value. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The len argument to ceph_osdc_build_request() is set up to be passed by address, but that function never updates its value so there's no need to do this. Tighten up the interface by passing the length directly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Since every osd message is now prepared to include trailing data, there's no need to check ahead of time whether any operations will make use of the trail portion of the message. We can drop the second argument to get_num_ops(), and as a result we can also get rid of op_needs_trail() which is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request structure contains an optional trail portion, which if present will contain data to be passed in the payload portion of the message containing the request. The trail field is a ceph_pagelist pointer, and if null it indicates there is no trail. A ceph_pagelist structure contains a length field, and it can legitimately hold value 0. Make use of this to change the interpretation of the "trail" of an osd request so that every osd request has trailing data, it just might have length 0. This means we change the r_trail field in a ceph_osd_request structure from a pointer to a structure that is always initialized. Note that in ceph_osdc_start_request(), the trail pointer (or now address of that structure) is assigned to a ceph message's trail field. Here's why that's still OK (looking at net/ceph/messenger.c): - What would have resulted in a null pointer previously will now refer to a 0-length page list. That message trail pointer is used in two functions, write_partial_msg_pages() and out_msg_pos_next(). - In write_partial_msg_pages(), a null page list pointer is handled the same as a message with 0-length trail, and both result in a "in_trail" variable set to false. The trail pointer is only used if in_trail is true. - The only other place the message trail pointer is used is out_msg_pos_next(). That function is only called by write_partial_msg_pages() and only touches the trail pointer if the in_trail value it is passed is true. Therefore a null ceph_msg->trail pointer is equivalent to a non-null pointer referring to a 0-length page list structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
For some reason, the snapid field of the osd request header is explicitly set to CEPH_NOSNAP in rbd_do_request(). Just a few lines later--with no code that would access this field in between--a call is made to ceph_calc_raw_layout() passing the snapid provided to rbd_do_request(), which encodes the snapid value it is provided into that field instead. In other words, there is no need to fill in CEPH_NOSNAP, and doing so suggests it might be necessary. Don't do that any more. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The snapc and snapid parameters to rbd_req_sync_op() always take the values NULL and CEPH_NOSNAP, respectively. So just get rid of them and use those values where needed. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All callers of rbd_req_sync_exec() pass CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ as their flags argument. Delete that parameter and use CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ within the function. If we find a need to support write operations we can add it back again. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is only one caller of rbd_req_sync_read(), and it passes CEPH_NOSNAP as the snapshot id argument. Delete that parameter and just use CEPH_NOSNAP within the function. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The last two parameters to ceph_osd_build_request() describe the object id, but the values passed always come from the osd request structure whose address is also provided. Get rid of those last two parameters. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Pull a block of code that initializes the layout structure in an osd request into its own function so it can be reused. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now we get the snapshot context for an rbd image (under protection of the header semaphore) for every request processed. There's no need to get the snap context if we're doing a read, so avoid doing so in that case. Note that we no longer need to hold the header semaphore to check the rbd_dev's existence flag. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The rbd_device->exists field can be updated asynchronously, changing from set to clear if a mapped snapshot disappears from the base image's snapshot context. Currently, value of the "exists" flag is only read and modified under protection of the header semaphore, but that will change with the next patch. Making it atomic ensures this won't be a problem because the a the non-existence of device will be immediately known. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Now that a big hunk in the middle of rbd_rq_fn() has been moved into its own routine we can simplify it a little more. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Only one of the three callers of rbd_do_request() provide a collection structure to aggregate status. If an error occurs in rbd_do_request(), have the caller take care of calling rbd_coll_end_req() if necessary in that one spot. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In rbd_rq_fn(), requests are fetched from the block layer and each request is processed, looping through the request's list of bio's until they've all been consumed. Separate the handling for a single request into its own function to make it a bit easier to see what's going on. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The result field in a ceph osd reply header is a signed 32-bit type, but rbd code often casually uses int to represent it. The following changes the types of variables that handle this result value to be "s32" instead of "int" to be completely explicit about it. Only at the point we pass that result to __blk_end_request() does the type get converted to the plain old int defined for that interface. There is almost certainly no binary impact of this change, but I prefer to show the exact size and signedness of the value since we know it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are spots where a ceph_osds_request pointer variable is given the name "req". Since we're dealing with (at least) three types of requests (block layer, rbd, and osd), I find this slightly distracting. Change such instances to use "osd_req" consistently to make the abstraction represented a little more obvious. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are two names used for items of rbd_request structure type: "req" and "req_data". The former name is also used to represent items of pointers to struct ceph_osd_request. Change all variables that have these names so they are instead called "rbd_req" consistently. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Josh suggested adding warnings to this function to help users diagnose problems. Other than memory allocatino errors, there are two places where errors can be returned. Both represent problems that should have been caught earlier, and as such might well have been handled with BUG_ON() calls. But if either ever did manage to happen, it will be reported. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a warning in bio_chain_clone_range() to help a user determine what exactly might have led to a failure. There is only one; please say something if you disagree with the following reasoning. There are three places this can return abnormally: - Initially, if there is nothing to clone. It turns out that right now this cannot happen anyway. The test is in place because the code below it doesn't work if those conditions don't hold. As such they could be assertions but since I can return a null to indicate an error I just do that instead. I have not added a warning here because it won't happen. - While processing bio's, if none remain but there are supposed to be more bytes to clone. Here I have added a warning. - If bio_clone_range() returns a null pointer. That function will have already produced a warning (at least the first time, via WARN_ON_ONCE()) to distinguish the cause of the error. The only exception is memory exhaustion, and I'd rather not pepper the code with warnings in all those spots. So no warning is added in that place. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Tell the user (via dmesg) what was wrong with the arguments provided via /sys/bus/rbd/add. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a new function rbd_warn() that produces a boilerplate warning message, identifying in the resulting message the affected rbd device in the best way available. Use it in a few places that now use pr_warning(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
It's kind of a silly macro, but ceph_encode_8_safe() is the only one missing from an otherwise pretty complete set. It's not used, but neither are a couple of the others in this set. While in there, insert some whitespace to tidy up the alignment of the line-terminating backslashes in some of the macro definitions. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This replaces two kmalloc()/memcpy() combinations with a single call to kmemdup(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is no real benefit to keeping the length of an image id, so get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There may have been a benefit to hanging on to the length of an image name before, but there is really none now. The only time it's used is when probing for rbd images, so we can just compute the length then. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
I promised Josh I would document whether there were any restrictions needed for accessing fields of an rbd_spec structure. This adds a big block of comments that documents the structure and how it is used--including the fact that we don't attempt to synchronize access to it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Zafman <david.zafman@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-