tty_paranoia_check() is only used within drivers/tty/tty_io.c;
remove extern declaration in header and limit symbol to file scope.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The correct lock order is atomic_write_lock => termios_rwsem, as
established by tty_write() => n_tty_write().

Fixes: c274f6ef ("tty: Hold termios_rwsem for tcflow(TCIxxx)")
Reported-and-Tested-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.18+
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Introduce API functions to restart and cancel tty buffer work, rather
than manipulate buffer work directly.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tty_write_message() allows the caller to directly write to a specific
tty. Since the line discipline is bypassed for the direct write,
nothing prevents the tty from being torn down after the tty count is
checked.

Hold the tty lock for the duration of the direct write.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tiocspgrp() is the ioctl handler for TIOCSPGRP, which runs in
non-atomic context; use spin_lock/unlock_irq (since interrupt state
is on).
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The job_control() check in n_tty_read() has nearly identical purpose
and results as tty_check_change(). Both functions' purpose is to
determine if the current task's pgrp is the foreground pgrp for the tty,
and if not, to signal the current pgrp.

Introduce __tty_check_change() which takes the signal to send
and performs the shared operations for job control() and
tty_check_change().
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This is mostly a hardening fix, given that write-only access to other
users' ttys is usually only given through setgid tty executables.
Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Commit a3a10ce3 ("Avoid usb reset crashes by making tty_io cdevs truly
dynamic") which mixes using cdev_alloc() and cdev_init() is problematic.
Subsequent call to cdev_init() after cdev_alloc() sets kobj release method
from cdev_dynamic_release() to cdev_default_release() and thus makes it
impossible to free allocated cdev.

This patch also consolidates error path of cdev_add() as cdev can also leak
here if things went wrong.
Signed-off-by: NLeon Yu <chianglungyu@gmail.com>
Fixes: a3a10ce3 ("Avoid usb reset crashes by making tty_io cdevs truly dynamic")
Acked-by: NRichard Watts <rrw@kynesim.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Avoid usb reset crashes by making tty_io cdevs truly dynamic
Signed-off-by: NRichard Watts <rrw@kynesim.co.uk>
Reported-by: NDuncan Mackintosh <DMackintosh@cbnl.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add tty_debug_hangup() macro which uses tty_debug to print the
debug message; remove inlined #ifdefs.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Introduce tty_debug() macro to output uniform debug information for
tty core debug messages (function name and tty name).

Note: printk(KERN_DEBUG) is retained here over pr_debug() since
messages can be enabled in non-DEBUG builds.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Output the function name, tty name, and invariant failure (if applicable).
Add the tty count to the tty_open() message. Fix the disassociate_ctty()
message, which printed the NULL pointer and the wrong message.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

task_pgrp requires an rcu or tasklist lock to be obtained if the returned pid
is to be dereferenced, which kill_pgrp does. Obtain an RCU lock for the
duration of use.
Signed-off-by: NPatrick Donnelly <batrick@batbytes.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tty_name no longer uses the buf parameter, so remove it along with all
the 64 byte stack buffers that used to be passed in.

Mostly generated by the coccinelle script

@depends on patch@
identifier buf;
constant C;
expression tty;
@@
- char buf[C];
  <+...
- tty_name(tty, buf)
+ tty_name(tty)
  ...+>

allmodconfig compiles, so I'm fairly confident the stack buffers
weren't used for other purposes as well.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

All users of tty_name pass the return value (the provided buffer) to
some printf-like function. We can thus avoid the strcpy and, more
importantly, later remove the buf parameter completely, eliminating
the need for some 64 byte stack buffers.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

All users of tty_name pass the result directly to a printf-like
function. This means we can actually let tty_name return the literal
"NULL tty" or tty->name directly, avoiding the strcpy and a lot of
medium-sized stack buffers. In preparation for that, make the return
type const char*.

While at it, we can also constify the tty parameter.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

We only care if anything other than the lower 3 bits of the tty has
changed, so just check that way, which makes it a bit faster, and more
obvious what is going on.  Also, document this for future developers to
understand why we did this.
Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org

Instead of manual calls of device_create_file() and
device_remove_file(), pass the static attribute groups using
device_create_with_groups().
Signed-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This problem was taken care of three times already in
* b0de59b5 (TTY: do not update
  atime/mtime on read/write),
* 37b7f3c7 (TTY: fix atime/mtime
  regression), and
* b0b88565 (tty: fix up atime/mtime
  mess, take three)

But it still misses one point. As John Paul correctly points out, we
do not care about setting date. If somebody ever changes wall
time backwards (by mistake for example), tty timestamps are never
updated until the original wall time passes.

So check the absolute difference of times and if it large than "8
seconds or so", always update the time. That means we will update
immediatelly when changing time. Ergo, CAP_SYS_TIME can foul the
check, but it was always that way.

Thanks John for serving me this so nicely debugged.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Reported-by: NJohn Paul Perry <john_paul.perry@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # all, as b0b88565 was backported
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Exclusive mode ttys (TTY_EXCLUSIVE) do not allow further reopens;
fail the condition before associating the file pointer and calling
the driver open() method.

Prevents DTR programming when the tty is already in exclusive mode.
Reported-by: NShreyas Bethur <shreyas.bethur@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Acked-by: NShreyas Bethur <shreyas.bethur@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The functions put_device() and tty_kref_put() test whether their argument
is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When somebody calls TIOCSSERIAL ioctl with serial flags to set one of
* ASYNC_SESSION_LOCKOUT
* ASYNC_PGRP_LOCKOUT
* ASYNC_CALLOUT_NOHUP
* ASYNC_AUTOPROBE
nothing happens. We actually ignore the flags for over a decade at
least (I checked 2.6.0).

So start yelling at users who use those flags, that they shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The use of older function ptr calling style, (*fn)(), makes static
analysis more error-prone; replace with modern fn() style.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tty_hung_up_p() is equivalent to the open-coded test in tty_open().
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

tty_ldisc_flush() first clears the line discipline input buffer,
then clears the tty flip buffers. However, this allows for existing
data in the tty flip buffers to be added after the ldisc input
buffer has been cleared, but before the flip buffers have been cleared.

Add an optional ldisc parameter to tty_buffer_flush() to allow
tty_ldisc_flush() to pass the ldisc to clear.

NB: Initially, the plan was to do this automatically in
tty_buffer_flush(). However, an audit of the behavior of existing
line disciplines showed that performing a ldisc buffer flush on
ioctl(TCFLSH) was not always the outcome. For example, some line
disciplines have flush_buffer() methods but not ioctl() methods,
so a ->flush_buffer() command would be unexpected.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When releasing the master pty, the slave pty also needs to be locked
to prevent concurrent tty count changes for the slave pty and to
ensure that only one parallel master and slave release observe the
final close, and proceed to destruct the pty pair. Conversely, when
releasing the slave pty, locking the master pty is not necessary
(since the master's state can be inferred by the slave tty count).

Introduce tty_lock_slave()/tty_unlock_slave() which acquires/releases
the tty lock of the slave pty. Remove tty_lock_pair()/tty_unlock_pair().

Dropping the tty_lock is no longer required to re-establish a stable
lock order.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The local o_tty variable in tty_release() is now accessed only
when closing the pty master.

Set o_tty to slave pty when closing pty master, otherwise NULL;
use o_tty != NULL as replacement for pty_master.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Passing the 'other' tty to tty_release_checks() only makes sense
for a pty pair; make o_tty scope local instead.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Passing the 'other' tty to tty_ldisc_release() only makes sense
for a pty pair; make o_tty function local instead.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Perform work flush for both ends of a pty pair within tty_flush_works(),
rather than calling twice.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When the slave side closes and its tty count is 0, the pty
pair can be destroyed; the master side must have already
closed for the slave side tty count to be 0. Thus, only the
pty master close must check if the slave side has closed by
checking the slave tty count.

Remove the pre-computed closing flags and check the actual count(s).
Regular ttys are unaffected by this change.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Holding the tty_lock() is necessary to prevent concurrent changes
to the tty count that may cause it to differ from the open file
list count. The tty_lock() is already held at all call sites.

NB: Note that the check for the pty master tty count is safe because
the slave's tty_lock() is held while decrementing the pty master
tty count.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Releasing the tty locks while waiting for the tty wait queues to
be empty is no longer necessary nor desirable. Prior to
"tty: Don't take tty_mutex for tty count changes", dropping the
tty locks was necessary to reestablish the correct lock order between
tty_mutex and the tty locks. Dropping the global tty_mutex was necessary;
otherwise new ttys could not have been opened while waiting.

However, without needing the global tty_mutex held, the tty locks for
the releasing tty can now be held through the sleep. The sanity check
is for abnormal conditions caused by kernel bugs, not for recoverable
errors caused by misbehaving userspace; dropping the tty locks only
allows the tty state to get more sideways.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Holding tty_mutex is no longer required to serialize changes to
the tty_count or to prevent concurrent opens of closing ttys;
tty_lock() is sufficient.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Now that re-open is not permitted for a legacy BSD pty master,
using TTY_CLOSING to indicate when a tty can be torn-down is
no longer necessary.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Holding tty_mutex for a tty re-open is no longer necessary since
"tty: Clarify re-open behavior of master ptys". Because the
slave tty count is no longer accessed by tty_reopen(), holding
tty_mutex to prevent concurrent final tty_release() of the slave
pty is not required.

As with "tty: Re-open /dev/tty without tty_mutex", holding a
tty kref until the tty_lock is acquired is sufficient to ensure
the tty has not been freed, which, in turn, is sufficient to
ensure the tty_lock can be safely acquired and the tty count
can be safely retrieved. A non-zero tty count with the tty lock
held guarantees that release_tty() has not run and cannot
run concurrently with tty_reopen().

Change tty_driver_lookup_tty() to acquire the tty kref, which
allows the tty_mutex to be dropped before acquiring the tty lock.
Dropping the tty_mutex before attempting the tty_lock allows
other ttys to be opened and released, without needing this
tty_reopen() to complete.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Opening /dev/tty (ie., the controlling tty for the current task)
is always a re-open of the underlying tty. Because holding the
tty_lock is sufficient for safely re-opening a tty, and because
having a tty kref is sufficient for safely acquiring the tty_lock [1],
tty_open_current_tty() does not require holding tty_mutex.

Repurpose tty_open_current_tty() to perform the re-open itself and
refactor tty_open().

[1] Analysis of safely re-opening the current tty w/o tty_mutex

get_current_tty() gets a tty kref from the already kref'ed tty value of
current->signal->tty while holding the sighand lock for the current
task. This guarantees that the tty pointer returned from
get_current_tty() points to a tty which remains referenceable
while holding the kref.

Although release_tty() may run concurrently, and thus the driver
reference may be removed, release_one_tty() cannot have run, and
won't while holding the tty kref.

This, in turn, guarantees the tty_lock() can safely be acquired
(since tty->magic and tty->legacy_mutex are still a valid dereferences).
The tty_lock() also gets a tty kref to prevent the tty_unlock() from
dereferencing a released tty. Thus, the kref returned from
get_current_tty() can be released.

Lastly, the first operation of tty_reopen() is to check the tty count.
If non-zero, this ensures release_tty() is not running concurrently,
and the driver references have not been removed.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Although perhaps not obvious, the TTY_CLOSING bit is set when the
tty count has been decremented to 0 (which occurs while holding
tty_lock). The only other case when tty count is 0 during a re-open
is when a legacy BSD pty master has been opened in parallel but
after the pty slave, which is unsupported and returns an error.

Thus !tty->count contains the complete set of degenerate conditions
under which a tty open fails.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Re-opening master ptys is not allowed. Once opened and for the remaining
lifetime of the master pty, its tty count is 1. If its tty count has
dropped to 0, then the master pty was closed and TTY_CLOSING was set,
and destruction may begin imminently.

Besides the normal case of a legacy BSD pty master being re-opened
(which always returns -EIO), this code is only reachable in 2 degenerate
cases:
1. The pty master is the controlling terminal (this is possible through
   the TIOCSCTTY ioctl). pty masters are not designed to be controlling
   terminals and it's an oversight that tiocsctty() ever let that happen.
   The attempted open of /dev/tty will always fail. No known program does
   this.
2. The legacy BSD pty slave was opened first. The slave open will fail
   in pty_open() and tty_release() will commence. But before tty_release()
   claims the tty_mutex, there is a very small window where a parallel
   master open might succeed. In a test of racing legacy BSD slave and
   master parallel opens, where:
      slave open attempts:  10000   success:4527  failure:5473
      master open attempts: 11728   success:5789  failure:5939
   only 8 master open attempts would have succeeded reaching this code and
   successfully opened the master pty. This case is not possible with
   SysV ptys.

Always return -EIO if a master pty is re-opened or the slave is opened
first and the master opened in parallel (for legacy BSD ptys).

Furthermore, now that changing the slave's count is not required,
the tty_lock is sufficient for preventing concurrent changes to the
tty being re-opened (or failing re-opening).
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Now that tty_ldisc_hangup() does not drop the tty lock, it is no
longer possible to observe TTY_HUPPING while holding the tty lock
on another cpu.

Remove TTY_HUPPING bit definition.
Reviewed-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>