TGL PSR2 HW supports a bigger resolution, so lets add it

BSpec: 50422, 49199
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

This fix unclaimed access warnings:

[  245.525788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  245.525884] Unclaimed read from register 0x62900
[  245.526154] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.526160] Modules linked in: i915 x86_pkg_temp_thermal ax88179_178a coretemp usbnet crct10dif_pclmul mii crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel e1000e [last unloaded: i915]
[  245.526191] CPU: 0 PID: 1234 Comm: kms_fullmodeset Not tainted 5.1.0-rc6+ #915
[  245.526197] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWR1.D00.2081.A10.1904182155 04/18/2019
[  245.526273] RIP: 0010:__unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.526281] Code: 74 05 5b 5d 41 5c c3 45 84 e4 48 c7 c0 76 97 21 a0 48 c7 c6 6c 97 21 a0 89 ea 48 0f 44 f0 48 c7 c7 7f 97 21 a0 e8 4f 1e fe e0 <0f> 0b 83 2d 6f d9 1c 00 01 5b 5d 41 5c c3 66 90 41 57 41 56 41 55
[  245.526288] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006bf7d8 EFLAGS: 00010086
[  245.526297] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  245.526304] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[  245.526310] RBP: 0000000000061900 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  245.526317] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
[  245.526324] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8882914f0d58 R15: 0000000000000206
[  245.526332] FS:  00007fed2a3c39c0(0000) GS:ffff8882a8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  245.526340] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  245.526347] CR2: 00007fed28dff000 CR3: 00000002a086c006 CR4: 0000000000760ef0
[  245.526354] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  245.526361] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  245.526367] PKRU: 55555554
[  245.526373] Call Trace:
[  245.526454]  gen11_fwtable_read32+0x219/0x250 [i915]
[  245.526576]  intel_psr_activate+0x57/0x400 [i915]
[  245.526697]  intel_psr_enable_locked+0x367/0x4b0 [i915]
[  245.526828]  intel_psr_enable+0xa4/0xd0 [i915]
[  245.526946]  intel_enable_ddi+0x127/0x2f0 [i915]
[  245.527075]  intel_encoders_enable.isra.79+0x62/0x90 [i915]
[  245.527202]  haswell_crtc_enable+0x2a2/0x850 [i915]
[  245.527337]  intel_update_crtc+0x51/0x360 [i915]
[  245.527466]  skl_update_crtcs+0x26c/0x300 [i915]
[  245.527603]  intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x3e5/0x13c0 [i915]
[  245.527757]  intel_atomic_commit+0x24d/0x2d0 [i915]
[  245.527782]  drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x7b/0x90
[  245.527799]  drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1b4/0x6f0
[  245.527856]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180
[  245.527867]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xad/0xf0
[  245.527886]  drm_ioctl+0x2f4/0x3b0
[  245.527902]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180
[  245.527935]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[  245.527956]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6d0
[  245.527970]  ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0xb6/0x200
[  245.527991]  ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[  245.528009]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[  245.528020]  do_syscall_64+0x55/0x180
[  245.528034]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  245.528042] RIP: 0033:0x7fed2cc7c3c7
[  245.528050] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 c9 3a 0d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 99 3a 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  245.528057] RSP: 002b:00007ffe36944378 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  245.528067] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe369443b0 RCX: 00007fed2cc7c3c7
[  245.528074] RDX: 00007ffe369443b0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  245.528081] RBP: 00007ffe369443b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000564c0173ae98
[  245.528088] R10: 0000564c0173aeb8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
[  245.528095] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[  245.528128] irq event stamp: 140866
[  245.528138] hardirqs last  enabled at (140865): [<ffffffff819a63dc>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60
[  245.528148] hardirqs last disabled at (140866): [<ffffffff819a624d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd/0x50
[  245.528158] softirqs last  enabled at (140860): [<ffffffff81c0038c>] __do_softirq+0x38c/0x499
[  245.528170] softirqs last disabled at (140853): [<ffffffff810b4a09>] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0
[  245.528247] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915]
[  245.528254] ---[ end trace 366069676e98a410 ]---
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

On TGL+ it's possible to have PSR1 enabled in other ports besides DDIA.
PSR2 is still limited to DDIA. However currently we handle only one
instance of PSR struct. Lets guard intel_psr_init_dpcd() against
multiple eDP panels and warn about it.

v2: Reword commit message to be TGL+ only and with the info where
PSR1/PSR2 are supported (Lucas)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().

v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com

According to PSR2_CTL definition in BSpec there is only one instance
of PSR2_CTL. Platforms gen < 12 with EDP transcoder only support PSR2
on TRANSCODER_EDP while on TGL PSR2 is only supported by
TRANSCODER_A.

Since BDW PSR is allowed on any port, but we need to restrict by
transcoder.

v8: Renamed _psr2_supported_in_trans() to psr2_supported() (Lucas)

v9: Renamed psr2_supported() to transcoder_has_psr2() (Ville)

BSpec: 7713
BSpec: 20584
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-2-jose.souza@intel.com

PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just
have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base.

For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET +
0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR
register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also
don't match the BSpec names.
For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are
only available in DDIA.

Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every
transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to
have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder.

So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any
PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ
that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance,
noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other
port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in
intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW
and will be changed in future.
PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why
_PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros.

The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are
PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it
hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another
patch.

Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it
is the only PSR register that GVT have.

v5:
- Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran)
- Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the
macros (Dhinakaran)

v6:
- Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the
transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran)
- Using lowercase to the registers offsets

v7:
- Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com

To reduce the number of explicit dev_priv->uncore calls in the display
code ahead of the introduction of dev_priv->de_uncore, this patch
introduces a wrapper for one of the main usages of it, the register
waits. When we transition to the new uncore, we can just update the
wrapper to point to the appropriate structure.

Since the vast majority of waits are on a set or clear of a bit or mask,
add set & clear flavours of the wrapper to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816012343.36433-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.

There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.

v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

To do frontbuffer tracking we are depending on Display WA #0884 to
exit PSR when there is a frontbuffer modification but according to
user reports a write to CURSURFLIVE do not cause PSR to exit in older
gens so lets force a PSR exit.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110799
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-by: NThomas Rohwer <trohwer85@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190617195154.30292-1-jose.souza@intel.com

Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.

display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.

v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

Add a new subdirectory for display code, and start off by moving
modesetting output/encoder code. Judging by the include changes, this is
a surprisingly clean operation.

v2:
- move intel_sdvo_regs.h too
- use tabs for Makefile	file lists and sort them

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-2-jani.nikula@intel.com

VSC SDP Payload for PSR is one of data block type of SDP (Secondaray Data
Packet). In order to generalize SDP packet structure name, it renames
struct edp_vsc_psr to struct dp_sdp. And each SDP data blocks have
different usages, each SDP type has different reserved data blocks and
Video_Stream_Configuration Extension VESA SDP might use all of Data Blocks
as Extended INFORFRAME Data Byte. so it makes Data Block variables as
array type. And it adds comments of details of DB of VSC SDP Payload
for Pixel Encoding/Colorimetry Format. This comments follows DP 1.4a spec,
section 2.2.5.7.5, chapter "VSC SDP Payload for Pixel Encoding/Colorimetry
Format".

v7: Addressed review comments from Ville.

v9: Rename a member value name DB to db on struct dp_sdp [Laurent]

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521121721.32010-3-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com

This patch checks a support of YCBCR420 outputs on an encoder level.
If the input mode is YCBCR420-only mode then it prepares DP as an YCBCR420
output, else it continues with RGB output mode.
It set output_format to INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420 in order to using
a pipe scaler as RGB to YCbCr 4:4:4.

v2:
  Addressed review comments from Ville.
  Style fixed with few naming.
  %s/config/crtc_state/
  %s/intel_crtc/crtc/
  If lscon is active, it makes not to call intel_dp_ycbcr420_config()
  to avoid to clobber of lspcon_ycbcr420_config() routine.
  And it move the 420_only check into the intel_dp_ycbcr420_config().

v3: Fix uninitialized return value and it is reported by Dan Carpenter.

v4:
  Addressed review comments from Ville.
  In order to avoid the extra indentation, it inverts if-clause on
  intel_dp_ycbcr420_config().
  Remove the error print where no errors print are allowed.

v6: Rebase

v7:
  Move intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status() to intel_dp from intel_psr.
  intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status() checks
  VSC_SDP_EXTENSION_FOR_COLORIMETRY_SUPPORTED bit in the
  DPRX_FEATURE_ENUMERATION_LIST register.
  And intel_dp_ycbcr420_config() uses intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status().

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521121721.32010-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com

This interlaced mode restriction applies to all gens, not only to
Haswell.

Also while at it updating the debug message to.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-4-jose.souza@intel.com

Even when driver is reloaded and hits this scenario the PSR mutex
should be initialized, otherwise reading PSR debugfs status will
execute mutex_lock() over a mutex that was not initialized.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-3-jose.souza@intel.com

Turn out it is not a DMC bug it is actually a HW one, so this
workaround will be needed for current gens, lets update the comment
and remove the FIXME.

BSpec: 7723
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-1-jose.souza@intel.com

It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.

Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.

No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/679c857a1933ee3d0706f978ab05ca880cd30a00.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.

Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.

No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/f86f9beed730eaad0bdcc18b18817b3d221e16e2.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.

Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.

No functional changes.

v2: Fix checkpatch whitespace complaint
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7e776690bf139ccdd0306b30df08dc68e74603de.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.

While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

There is probably a issue in DMC firmwares(icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin and
kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin at least) that causes PSR2 SU to fail after
exiting DC6 if EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL is kept in PSR_CTL, so for now
lets workaround the issue by cleaning PSR_CTL before enable PSR2.

v2:
- Updated commit description and comment to state that it may be
a DMC firmware issue (Rodrigo)
- No need to RMW, let's write 0 to PSR_CTL(Dhinakaran)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190314230113.6571-1-jose.souza@intel.com

We've been free of deprecated drmP.h includes for a while, but one crept
in. Fend it off.

Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190318160409.27648-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

When any other value than EDP_PSR_TP4_TIME_0US is set, TPS1 and TPS4
will be used to do the link training when exiting PSR1.
Happily the eDP panels tested so far was able to sync with source
even without HBR3/TPS4 support but let use the right training
pattern.

TPS4 support was added to PSR1 registers because HBR3/PSR
specification was not closed when ICL was freezed so if HBR3 was
supported by PSR, ICL would already be ready but it was not added to
specification so lets always disable TPS4.

v3: Missed ";" SPANK SPANK SPANK!!!

BSpec: 17524

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-3-jose.souza@intel.com

This will make hsw_activate_psr1() more easy to read and will make
future modification to TPS registers more easy to review and read.

v4: Rename new function to intel_psr1_get_tp_time() (Dhinakaran and
Rodrigo)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-2-jose.souza@intel.com

A new field with the training pattern(TP) wakeup time for PSR2 was
added to VBT, so lets use it when available otherwise it will
fallback to PSR1 wakeup time.

v2: replacing enum to numerical usec time (Jani)

BSpec: 20131

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-1-jose.souza@intel.com

The support for PSR2 was polished, IGT tests for PSR2 was added and
it was tested performing regular user workloads like browsing,
editing documents and compiling Linux, so it is time to enable it by
default and enjoy even more power-savings.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-9-jose.souza@intel.com

If PSR1 is active when pipe CRC is enabled the CRC calculations will
be inhibit by the transition to low power states that PSR1 brings.
So lets force a PSR1 exit and as soon as pipe CRC is enabled it will
block PSR1 activation and avoid CRC timeouts when running IGT tests.

There is a little window between the call to force exit PSR and the
write to pipe CRC registers that needs to happen within the minimum
of 6 idles frames otherwise PSR1 will be active again causing the CRC
timeouts but anyways this will at least reduce the occurrence of CRC
timeouts.

This can possibily fix issues present right now but I did not found
any open, I mostly got this issue from previous CI runs of this
series, bellow some exambles:

* igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-0-75:
- shard-apl:          PASS -> FAIL +9

* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-busy-crc-legacy:
- shard-apl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +17

* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-indfb-pgflip-blt:
- shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +12

* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-c:
- shard-kbl:          PASS -> FAIL +7

v6: s/PSR/PSR1 (Dhinakaran)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-8-jose.souza@intel.com

All of this checks are redudant and can be removed as the if bellow
already takes care when there is no changes in the state.
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-7-jose.souza@intel.com

When PSR2 is active aka after the number of frames programmed in
PSR2_CTL 'Frames Before SU Entry' hardware stops to generate CRC
interrupts causing IGT tests to fail due timeout.

This same behavior don't happen with PSR1, as soon as pipe CRC is
enabled it blocks PSR1 activation so CRC calculation continues to
happens normaly.

This patch also set mode_changed as true when PSR is available to
force atomic check functions to compute new PSR state, otherwise PSR2
would not be disabled.

v4: Only setting mode_changed if has_psr is set(Dhinakaran)

v3: Reusing intel_crtc_crc_prepare() and crc_enabled, only setting
mode_changed if it can do PSR.

v2: Changed commit description to describe that PSR2 inhibit CRC
calculations.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-6-jose.souza@intel.com

If has_psr is set it means that CRTC has a EDP panel attached so the
EDP check is redundant and can be dropped.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-4-jose.souza@intel.com

Forcing a specific CRTC to the eDP connector was causing the
intel_psr_fastset_force() to mark mode_chaged in the wrong and
disabled CRTC causing no update in the PSR state.

Looks like our internal state track do not clear output_types and
has_psr in the disabled CRTCs, not sure if this is the expected
behavior or not but in the mean time this fix the issue.

Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-2-jose.souza@intel.com

Now we are checking sink capabilities when probing PSR DPCD register
and then dynamically checking in if new state is compatible with PSR
in, so this FIXME can be dropped.
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-1-jose.souza@intel.com

Changing the i915_edp_psr_debug was enabling, disabling or switching
PSR version by directly calling intel_psr_disable_locked() and
intel_psr_enable_locked(), what is not the default PSR path that will
be executed by real users.

So lets force a fastset in the PSR CRTC to trigger a pipe update and
stress the default code path.

Recently a bug was found when switching from PSR2 to PSR1 while
enable_psr kernel parameter was set to the default parameter, this
changes fix it and also fixes the bug linked bellow were DRRS was
left enabled together with PSR when enabling PSR from debugfs.

v2: Handling missing case: disabled to PSR1

v3: Not duplicating the whole atomic state(Maarten)

v4: Adding back the missing call to intel_psr_irq_control(Dhinakaran)

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108341
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190206211845.5322-1-jose.souza@intel.com

For now PSR2 is still disabled by default for all platforms but is
our intention to let debugfs to enable it for debug and tests
proporses, so intel_psr2_enabled() that is also used by debugfs to
decide if PSR2 is going to be enabled needs to take in consideration
the debug field.

v2: Using the switch/case that intel_psr2_enabled() already had to
handle this(DK)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190117205548.28378-1-jose.souza@intel.com

Mixed C99 and kernel types use is getting ugly. Prefer kernel types.

sed -i 's/\buint\(8\|16\|32\|64\)_t\b/u\1/g'

Minor checkpatch fixes sprinkled on top of the changed lines.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/14ed72e7f04c9340a057855c5950b54811f8a477.1547629303.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

i915 yet don't support PSR in Apple panels, so lets keep it disabled
while we work on that.

v2: Renamed DP_DPCD_QUIRK_PSR_NOT_CURRENTLY_SUPPORTED to
DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR (Ville)

v3:
Adding documentation to DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR(Dhinakaran and Jani)
Fixed typo in comment of the new quirk entry(Jani)

Fixes: 598c6cfe (drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-1-jose.souza@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 7c5c641a)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Needs just a few additional includes here and there.

Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190108082709.3748-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.

The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:

@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)

v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
    using the bitmask
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update
granularity that source must comply.
Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports
it.

v3:
- Returning the default granularity in case DPCD read fails(Dhinakaran)
- Changed DPCD error message level(Dhinakaran)

v4:
- Setting granularity to defaul when granularity read is equal to
0(Dhinakaran)

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-9-jose.souza@intel.com

Selective updates have a default granularity requirements as stated
by eDP spec(PSR2 SELECTIVE UPDATE X GRANULARITY CAPABILITY register
definition), so check if HW can match those requirements before
enabling PSR2.

v3:
- Changes in the comments and commit message(Dhinakaran)
- Printing the hdisplay that do not match with default granularity

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-8-jose.souza@intel.com