1. 02 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • P
      mlxsw: pci: PTP: Hook into packet transmit path · 0714256c
      Petr Machata 提交于
      On Spectrum-1, timestamps are delivered separately from the packets, and
      need to paired up. Therefore, at some point after mlxsw_sp_port_xmit()
      is invoked, it is necessary to involve the chip-specific driver code to
      allow it to do the necessary bookkeeping and matching.
      
      On Spectrum-2, timestamps are delivered in CQE. For that reason,
      position the point of driver involvement into mlxsw_pci_cqe_sdq_handle()
      to make it hopefully easier to extend for Spectrum-2 in the future.
      
      To tell the driver what port the packet was sent on, keep tx_info
      in SKB control buffer.
      
      Introduce a new driver core interface mlxsw_core_ptp_transmitted(), a
      driver callback ptp_transmitted, and a PTP op transmitted. The callee is
      responsible for taking care of releasing the SKB passed to the new
      interfaces, and correspondingly have the new stub callbacks just call
      dev_kfree_skb_any().
      
      Follow-up patches will introduce the actual content into
      mlxsw_sp1_ptp_transmitted() in particular.
      Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0714256c
  2. 14 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 05 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  4. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 19 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  6. 23 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 11 4月, 2019 3 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for mlxsw workqueue · b442fed1
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      The workqueue is used to periodically update the networking stack about
      activity / statistics of various objects such as neighbours and TC
      actions.
      
      It should not be called as part of memory reclaim path, so remove the
      WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag.
      
      Fixes: 3d5479e9 ("mlxsw: core: Remove deprecated create_workqueue")
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b442fed1
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for mlxsw ordered workqueue · 4af06997
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      The ordered workqueue is used to offload various objects such as routes
      and neighbours in the order they are notified.
      
      It should not be called as part of memory reclaim path, so remove the
      WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag. This can also result in a warning [1], if a worker
      tries to flush a non-WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue.
      
      [1]
      [97703.542861] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM mlxsw_core_ordered:mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work [mlxsw_spectrum] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:rht_deferred_worker
      [97703.542884] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 32492 at kernel/workqueue.c:2605 check_flush_dependency+0xb5/0x130
      ...
      [97703.542988] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018
      [97703.543049] Workqueue: mlxsw_core_ordered mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543061] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0xb5/0x130
      ...
      [97703.543071] RSP: 0018:ffffb3f08137bc00 EFLAGS: 00010086
      [97703.543076] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96e07740ae00 RCX: 0000000000000000
      [97703.543080] RDX: 0000000000000094 RSI: ffffffff82dc1934 RDI: 0000000000000046
      [97703.543084] RBP: ffffb3f08137bc20 R08: ffffffff82dc18a0 R09: 00000000000225c0
      [97703.543087] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000007eec R12: ffffffff816e4ee0
      [97703.543091] R13: ffff96e06f6a5c00 R14: ffff96e077ba7700 R15: ffffffff812ab0c0
      [97703.543097] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff96e077a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [97703.543101] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [97703.543104] CR2: 00007f8cd135b280 CR3: 00000001e860e003 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [97703.543109] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [97703.543112] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [97703.543115] Call Trace:
      [97703.543129] __flush_work+0xbd/0x1e0
      [97703.543137] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x136/0x1b0
      [97703.543145] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x49/0xa0
      [97703.543154] __cancel_work_timer+0x136/0x1b0
      [97703.543175] ? mlxsw_reg_trans_bulk_wait+0x145/0x400 [mlxsw_core]
      [97703.543184] cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
      [97703.543191] rhashtable_free_and_destroy+0x23/0x140
      [97703.543198] rhashtable_destroy+0xd/0x10
      [97703.543254] mlxsw_sp_fib_destroy+0xb1/0xf0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543310] mlxsw_sp_vr_put+0xa8/0xc0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543364] mlxsw_sp_fib_node_put+0xbf/0x140 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543418] ? mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry_destroy+0xe8/0x110 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543475] mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work+0x6cd/0x7f0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [97703.543484] process_one_work+0x1fd/0x400
      [97703.543493] worker_thread+0x34/0x410
      [97703.543500] kthread+0x121/0x140
      [97703.543507] ? process_one_work+0x400/0x400
      [97703.543512] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
      [97703.543523] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
      
      Fixes: a3832b31 ("mlxsw: core: Create an ordered workqueue for FIB offload")
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reported-by: NSemion Lisyansky <semionl@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4af06997
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for EMAD workqueue · a8c133b0
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      The EMAD workqueue is used to handle retransmission of EMAD packets that
      contain configuration data for the device's firmware.
      
      Given the workers need to allocate these packets and that the code is
      not called as part of memory reclaim path, remove the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
      flag.
      
      Fixes: d965465b ("mlxsw: core: Fix possible deadlock")
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a8c133b0
  8. 09 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 05 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  10. 29 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  11. 25 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  12. 04 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 09 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      devlink: publish params only after driver init is done · 7c62cfb8
      Jiri Pirko 提交于
      Currently, user can do dump or get of param values right after the
      devlink params are registered. However the driver may not be initialized
      which is an issue. The same problem happens during notification
      upon param registration. Allow driver to publish devlink params
      whenever it is ready to handle get() ops. Note that this cannot
      be resolved by init reordering, as the "driverinit" params have
      to be available before the driver is initialized (it needs the param
      values there).
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
      Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7c62cfb8
  14. 07 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 19 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      mlxsw: core: Increase timeout during firmware flash process · cf0b70e7
      Shalom Toledo 提交于
      During the firmware flash process, some of the EMADs get timed out, which
      causes the driver to send them again with a limit of 5 retries. There are
      some situations in which 5 retries is not enough and the EMAD access fails.
      If the failed EMAD was related to the flashing process, the driver fails
      the flashing.
      
      The reason for these timeouts during firmware flashing is cache misses in
      the CPU running the firmware. In case the CPU needs to fetch instructions
      from the flash when a firmware is flashed, it needs to wait for the
      flashing to complete. Since flashing takes time, it is possible for pending
      EMADs to timeout.
      
      Fix by increasing EMADs' timeout while flashing firmware.
      
      Fixes: ce6ef68f ("mlxsw: spectrum: Implement the ethtool flash_device callback")
      Signed-off-by: NShalom Toledo <shalomt@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cf0b70e7
  16. 04 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  17. 30 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  18. 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  19. 11 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  20. 10 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  21. 06 6月, 2018 2 次提交
  22. 29 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  23. 20 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  24. 11 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  25. 01 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  26. 17 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  27. 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Fix possible deadlock · d965465b
      Ido Schimmel 提交于
      When an EMAD is transmitted, a timeout work item is scheduled with a
      delay of 200ms, so that another EMAD will be retried until a maximum of
      five retries.
      
      In certain situations, it's possible for the function waiting on the
      EMAD to be associated with a work item that is queued on the same
      workqueue (`mlxsw_core`) as the timeout work item. This results in
      flushing a work item on the same workqueue.
      
      According to commit e159489b ("workqueue: relax lockdep annotation
      on flush_work()") the above may lead to a deadlock in case the workqueue
      has only one worker active or if the system in under memory pressure and
      the rescue worker is in use. The latter explains the very rare and
      random nature of the lockdep splats we have been seeing:
      
      [   52.730240] ============================================
      [   52.736179] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
      [   52.742119] 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4 Not tainted
      [   52.746697] --------------------------------------------
      [   52.752635] kworker/1:3/599 is trying to acquire lock:
      [   52.758378]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c4fa4>] flush_work+0x3a4/0x5e0
      [   52.767837]
                     but task is already holding lock:
      [   52.774360]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
      [   52.784495]
                     other info that might help us debug this:
      [   52.791794]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [   52.798413]        CPU0
      [   52.801144]        ----
      [   52.803875]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
      [   52.808556]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
      [   52.813236]
                      *** DEADLOCK ***
      [   52.819857]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      [   52.827450] 3 locks held by kworker/1:3/599:
      [   52.832221]  #0:  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
      [   52.842846]  #1:  ((&(&bridge->fdb_notify.dw)->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
      [   52.854537]  #2:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff822ad8e7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
      [   52.863021]
                     stack backtrace:
      [   52.867890] CPU: 1 PID: 599 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4
      [   52.875773] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. "MSN2100-CB2F"/"SA001017", BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016
      [   52.886267] Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [   52.894060] Call Trace:
      [   52.909122]  __lock_acquire+0xf6f/0x2a10
      [   53.025412]  lock_acquire+0x158/0x440
      [   53.047557]  flush_work+0x3c4/0x5e0
      [   53.087571]  __cancel_work_timer+0x3ca/0x5e0
      [   53.177051]  cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
      [   53.182142]  mlxsw_reg_trans_bulk_wait+0x12d/0x7a0 [mlxsw_core]
      [   53.194571]  mlxsw_core_reg_access+0x586/0x990 [mlxsw_core]
      [   53.225365]  mlxsw_reg_query+0x10/0x20 [mlxsw_core]
      [   53.230882]  mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work+0x2a3/0x9d0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
      [   53.237801]  process_one_work+0x8f1/0x12f0
      [   53.321804]  worker_thread+0x1fd/0x10c0
      [   53.435158]  kthread+0x28e/0x370
      [   53.448703]  ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
      [   53.453017] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (2/5) (tid=bf4549b100000774)
      [   53.453119] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (5/5) (tid=bf4549b100000770)
      [   53.453132] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD reg access failed (tid=bf4549b100000770,reg_id=200b(sfn),type=query,status=0(operation performed))
      [   53.453143] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: Failed to get FDB notifications
      
      Fix this by creating another workqueue for EMAD timeouts, thereby
      preventing the situation of a work item trying to flush a work item
      queued on the same workqueue.
      
      Fixes: caf7297e ("mlxsw: core: Introduce support for asynchronous EMAD register access")
      Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d965465b
  28. 03 8月, 2017 1 次提交