Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 21 8月, 2021 3 次提交
  5. 26 7月, 2021 2 次提交
  7. 15 7月, 2021 3 次提交
  9. 18 6月, 2021 3 次提交
  11. 25 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 10 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 07 5月, 2021 1 次提交
    • T
      KVM: SVM: Move GHCB unmapping to fix RCU warning · ce7ea0cf
      由 Tom Lendacky 提交于 
      When an SEV-ES guest is running, the GHCB is unmapped as part of the
vCPU run support. However, kvm_vcpu_unmap() triggers an RCU dereference
warning with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y because the SRCU lock is released
before invoking the vCPU run support.

Move the GHCB unmapping into the prepare_guest_switch callback, which is
invoked while still holding the SRCU lock, eliminating the RCU dereference
warning.

Fixes: 291bd20d ("KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXIT")
Reported-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Message-Id: <b2f9b79d15166f2c3e4375c0d9bc3268b7696455.1620332081.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      ce7ea0cf
  17. 26 4月, 2021 5 次提交
  19. 22 4月, 2021 1 次提交
    • N
      KVM: x86: Support KVM VMs sharing SEV context · 54526d1f
      由 Nathan Tempelman 提交于 
      Add a capability for userspace to mirror SEV encryption context from
one vm to another. On our side, this is intended to support a
Migration Helper vCPU, but it can also be used generically to support
other in-guest workloads scheduled by the host. The intention is for
the primary guest and the mirror to have nearly identical memslots.

The primary benefits of this are that:
1) The VMs do not share KVM contexts (think APIC/MSRs/etc), so they
can't accidentally clobber each other.
2) The VMs can have different memory-views, which is necessary for post-copy
migration (the migration vCPUs on the target need to read and write to
pages, when the primary guest would VMEXIT).

This does not change the threat model for AMD SEV. Any memory involved
is still owned by the primary guest and its initial state is still
attested to through the normal SEV_LAUNCH_* flows. If userspace wanted
to circumvent SEV, they could achieve the same effect by simply attaching
a vCPU to the primary VM.
This patch deliberately leaves userspace in charge of the memslots for the
mirror, as it already has the power to mess with them in the primary guest.

This patch does not support SEV-ES (much less SNP), as it does not
handle handing off attested VMSAs to the mirror.

For additional context, we need a Migration Helper because SEV PSP
migration is far too slow for our live migration on its own. Using
an in-guest migrator lets us speed this up significantly.
Signed-off-by: NNathan Tempelman <natet@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210408223214.2582277-1-natet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      54526d1f
  21. 20 4月, 2021 3 次提交
  23. 17 4月, 2021 1 次提交
    • M
      KVM: nSVM: improve SYSENTER emulation on AMD · adc2a237
      由 Maxim Levitsky 提交于 
      Currently to support Intel->AMD migration, if CPU vendor is GenuineIntel,
we emulate the full 64 value for MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_{EIP|ESP}
msrs, and we also emulate the sysenter/sysexit instruction in long mode.

(Emulator does still refuse to emulate sysenter in 64 bit mode, on the
ground that the code for that wasn't tested and likely has no users)

However when virtual vmload/vmsave is enabled, the vmload instruction will
update these 32 bit msrs without triggering their msr intercept,
which will lead to having stale values in kvm's shadow copy of these msrs,
which relies on the intercept to be up to date.

Fix/optimize this by doing the following:

1. Enable the MSR intercepts for SYSENTER MSRs iff vendor=GenuineIntel
   (This is both a tiny optimization and also ensures that in case
   the guest cpu vendor is AMD, the msrs will be 32 bit wide as
   AMD defined).

2. Store only high 32 bit part of these msrs on interception and combine
   it with hardware msr value on intercepted read/writes
   iff vendor=GenuineIntel.

3. Disable vmload/vmsave virtualization if vendor=GenuineIntel.
   (It is somewhat insane to set vendor=GenuineIntel and still enable
   SVM for the guest but well whatever).
   Then zero the high 32 bit parts when kvm intercepts and emulates vmload.

Thanks a lot to Paulo Bonzini for helping me with fixing this in the most
correct way.

This patch fixes nested migration of 32 bit nested guests, that was
broken because incorrect cached values of SYSENTER msrs were stored in
the migration stream if L1 changed these msrs with
vmload prior to L2 entry.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210401111928.996871-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      adc2a237
  25. 05 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  27. 15 3月, 2021 7 次提交
  29. 04 2月, 2021 3 次提交
    • M
      KVM: SVM: use .prepare_guest_switch() to handle CPU register save/setup · a7fc06dd
      由 Michael Roth 提交于 
      Currently we save host state like user-visible host MSRs, and do some
initial guest register setup for MSR_TSC_AUX and MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO
in svm_vcpu_load(). Defer this until just before we enter the guest by
moving the handling to kvm_x86_ops.prepare_guest_switch() similarly to
how it is done for the VMX implementation.

Additionally, since handling of saving/restoring host user MSRs is the
same both with/without SEV-ES enabled, move that handling to common
code.
Suggested-by: NSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Message-Id: <20210202190126.2185715-4-michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      a7fc06dd
    • M
      KVM: SVM: remove uneeded fields from host_save_users_msrs · 553cc15f
      由 Michael Roth 提交于 
      Now that the set of host user MSRs that need to be individually
saved/restored are the same with/without SEV-ES, we can drop the
.sev_es_restored flag and just iterate through the list unconditionally
for both cases. A subsequent patch can then move these loops to a
common path.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Message-Id: <20210202190126.2185715-3-michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      553cc15f
    • M
      KVM: SVM: use vmsave/vmload for saving/restoring additional host state · e79b91bb
      由 Michael Roth 提交于 
      Using a guest workload which simply issues 'hlt' in a tight loop to
generate VMEXITs, it was observed (on a recent EPYC processor) that a
significant amount of the VMEXIT overhead measured on the host was the
result of MSR reads/writes in svm_vcpu_load/svm_vcpu_put according to
perf:

  67.49%--kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run
          |
          |--23.13%--vcpu_put
          |          kvm_arch_vcpu_put
          |          |
          |          |--21.31%--native_write_msr
          |          |
          |           --1.27%--svm_set_cr4
          |
          |--16.11%--vcpu_load
          |          |
          |           --15.58%--kvm_arch_vcpu_load
          |                     |
          |                     |--13.97%--svm_set_cr4
          |                     |          |
          |                     |          |--12.64%--native_read_msr

Most of these MSRs relate to 'syscall'/'sysenter' and segment bases, and
can be saved/restored using 'vmsave'/'vmload' instructions rather than
explicit MSR reads/writes. In doing so there is a significant reduction
in the svm_vcpu_load/svm_vcpu_put overhead measured for the above
workload:

  50.92%--kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run
          |
          |--19.28%--disable_nmi_singlestep
          |
          |--13.68%--vcpu_load
          |          kvm_arch_vcpu_load
          |          |
          |          |--9.19%--svm_set_cr4
          |          |          |
          |          |           --6.44%--native_read_msr
          |          |
          |           --3.55%--native_write_msr
          |
          |--6.05%--kvm_inject_nmi
          |--2.80%--kvm_sev_es_mmio_read
          |--2.19%--vcpu_put
          |          |
          |           --1.25%--kvm_arch_vcpu_put
          |                     native_write_msr

Quantifying this further, if we look at the raw cycle counts for a
normal iteration of the above workload (according to 'rdtscp'),
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() takes ~4600 cycles from start to finish with
the current behavior. Using 'vmsave'/'vmload', this is reduced to
~2800 cycles, a savings of 39%.

While this approach doesn't seem to manifest in any noticeable
improvement for more realistic workloads like UnixBench, netperf, and
kernel builds, likely due to their exit paths generally involving IO
with comparatively high latencies, it does improve overall overhead
of KVM_RUN significantly, which may still be noticeable for certain
situations. It also simplifies some aspects of the code.

With this change, explicit save/restore is no longer needed for the
following host MSRs, since they are documented[1] as being part of the
VMCB State Save Area:

  MSR_STAR, MSR_LSTAR, MSR_CSTAR,
  MSR_SYSCALL_MASK, MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE,
  MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS,
  MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP,
  MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
  MSR_FS_BASE, MSR_GS_BASE

and only the following MSR needs individual handling in
svm_vcpu_put/svm_vcpu_load:

  MSR_TSC_AUX

We could drop the host_save_user_msrs array/loop and instead handle
MSR read/write of MSR_TSC_AUX directly, but we leave that for now as
a potential follow-up.

Since 'vmsave'/'vmload' also handles the LDTR and FS/GS segment
registers (and associated hidden state)[2], some of the code
previously used to handle this is no longer needed, so we drop it
as well.

The first public release of the SVM spec[3] also documents the same
handling for the host state in question, so we make these changes
unconditionally.

Also worth noting is that we 'vmsave' to the same page that is
subsequently used by 'vmrun' to record some host additional state. This
is okay, since, in accordance with the spec[2], the additional state
written to the page by 'vmrun' does not overwrite any fields written by
'vmsave'. This has also been confirmed through testing (for the above
CPU, at least).

[1] AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual, Rev 3.33, Volume 2, Appendix B, Table B-2
[2] AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual, Rev 3.31, Volume 3, Chapter 4, VMSAVE/VMLOAD
[3] Secure Virtual Machine Architecture Reference Manual, Rev 3.01
Suggested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Message-Id: <20210202190126.2185715-2-michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      e79b91bb
  31. 03 2月, 2021 1 次提交
    • P
      KVM: x86: cleanup CR3 reserved bits checks · c1c35cf7
      由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于 
      If not in long mode, the low bits of CR3 are reserved but not enforced to
be zero, so remove those checks.  If in long mode, however, the MBZ bits
extend down to the highest physical address bit of the guest, excluding
the encryption bit.

Make the checks consistent with the above, and match them between
nested_vmcb_checks and KVM_SET_SREGS.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 761e4169 ("KVM: nSVM: Check that MBZ bits in CR3 and CR4 are not set on vmrun of nested guests")
Fixes: a780a3ea ("KVM: X86: Fix reserved bits check for MOV to CR3")
Reviewed-by: NSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      c1c35cf7
  33. 08 1月, 2021 1 次提交
    • T
      KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs in an SEV-ES guest · 647daca2
      由 Tom Lendacky 提交于 
      Typically under KVM, an AP is booted using the INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence,
where the guest vCPU register state is updated and then the vCPU is VMRUN
to begin execution of the AP. For an SEV-ES guest, this won't work because
the guest register state is encrypted.

Following the GHCB specification, the hypervisor must not alter the guest
register state, so KVM must track an AP/vCPU boot. Should the guest want
to park the AP, it must use the AP Reset Hold exit event in place of, for
example, a HLT loop.

First AP boot (first INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence):
  Execute the AP (vCPU) as it was initialized and measured by the SEV-ES
  support. It is up to the guest to transfer control of the AP to the
  proper location.

Subsequent AP boot:
  KVM will expect to receive an AP Reset Hold exit event indicating that
  the vCPU is being parked and will require an INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence to
  awaken it. When the AP Reset Hold exit event is received, KVM will place
  the vCPU into a simulated HLT mode. Upon receiving the INIT-SIPI-SIPI
  sequence, KVM will make the vCPU runnable. It is again up to the guest
  to then transfer control of the AP to the proper location.

  To differentiate between an actual HLT and an AP Reset Hold, a new MP
  state is introduced, KVM_MP_STATE_AP_RESET_HOLD, which the vCPU is
  placed in upon receiving the AP Reset Hold exit event. Additionally, to
  communicate the AP Reset Hold exit event up to userspace (if needed), a
  new exit reason is introduced, KVM_EXIT_AP_RESET_HOLD.

A new x86 ops function is introduced, vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector, in order
to accomplish AP booting. For VMX, vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector is set to the
original SIPI delivery function, kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(). SVM adds
a new function that, for non SEV-ES guests, invokes the original SIPI
delivery function, kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(), but for SEV-ES guests,
implements the logic above.
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Message-Id: <e8fbebe8eb161ceaabdad7c01a5859a78b424d5e.1609791600.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      647daca2
  35. 16 12月, 2020 1 次提交
  37. 15 12月, 2020 1 次提交
    • T
      KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests · 16809ecd
      由 Tom Lendacky 提交于 
      The run sequence is different for an SEV-ES guest compared to a legacy or
even an SEV guest. The guest vCPU register state of an SEV-ES guest will
be restored on VMRUN and saved on VMEXIT. There is no need to restore the
guest registers directly and through VMLOAD before VMRUN and no need to
save the guest registers directly and through VMSAVE on VMEXIT.

Update the svm_vcpu_run() function to skip register state saving and
restoring and provide an alternative function for running an SEV-ES guest
in vmenter.S

Additionally, certain host state is restored across an SEV-ES VMRUN. As
a result certain register states are not required to be restored upon
VMEXIT (e.g. FS, GS, etc.), so only do that if the guest is not an SEV-ES
guest.
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Message-Id: <fb1c66d32f2194e171b95fc1a8affd6d326e10c1.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      16809ecd