Like we already do for the LVDS panels. This seems to help greatly
in setting up the backlight, since the BIOS might refuse to cooperate.
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

v2: Move the backlight_off call from panel_off to edp_backlight_off,
noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

3 changes:
- If a given value is unset, use the maximal limits from the eDP spec.
- Write back the new values, since otherwise the panel power sequencing
  hw will not dtrt.
- Revert the early bail-out in case the register values are unset.

The last change reverts

commit bfa3384a
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:   Tue Apr 10 11:58:04 2012 -0700

    drm/i915: check PPS regs for sanity when using eDP

v2:
- Unlock the PP regs as the very first thing. This is a required w/a
  for cpu eDP on port A, and generally a good idea.
- Fixup the panel power control port selection bits.

v3: Paulo Zanoni noticed that I've fumbled the computation of the spec
limit values. Fix them up. We've also noticed that the t8/t9 values in
the vbt/bios-programmed pp are much larger than any limits. My guess
is that this is to conceal any backlight enable/disable delays. So by
using the much shorter limits from the spec, which only concerns the
sink, we risk that we might display before the backlight is fully on,
or disable the output while the backlight still has afterglow. I've
figured I don't care too much, since this will only happen when both
the pp regs are not programmed, and the vbt tables don't contain
anything useful.

v4: Don't set the port selection bits on hsw/LPT, they don't exist any
more.

v5: Fixup spelling issues in comments, as noticed by Jesse Barnes.
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Haswell does not have a scaler in the sprite pipeline anymore, so let's
ensure:
  1/ We bail out of update_plate() when someone is trying to ask to
     display a scaled framebuffer,
  2/ We never write to the nonexistent SPR_SCALE register

v2: Smash in the fixup from Damien in the disable_plane function.

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (for v1)
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (for v1)
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

... like the comment says. No idea whether this has any effect, but
I guess it's better to not lie to the display by acking a test request
and never following through with it. This goes back to the commit that
originally introduced this code:

commit a60f0e38
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:   Thu Oct 20 15:09:17 2011 -0700

    drm/i915: add DP test request handling
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Meh'ed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Only really required for dp 1.2. I've hoped this would help with some
link training woes I'm fighting, but alas those are only dp 1.1
devices.

Also move a comment that went misplaced in the recent refactorings to
the right spot again.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This requires a few changes since that dpcd value is above the
range currently cached by radeon. I've check the dp specs, and
above 0xf there's a big gap and nothing that looks like we should
cache it while a given device is plugged in. It's also the same value
that i915.ko uses.

Hence extend the various dpcd arrays in the radeon driver, use
proper symbolic constants where applicable (one place overallocated
the dpcd array to 25 bytes). Then also drop the rd_interval cache -
radeon_dp_link_train_init re-reads the dpcd block, so the values we'll
consume in train_cr and train_ce will always be fresh.

To avoid needless diff-churn, #define the old size of dpcd as the new
one and keep it around.

v2: Alex Deucher noticed one place where I've forgotten to replace 8
with DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Safe for the minor difference that the intel versions get an offset
into the link_status as an argument, both are the same again.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

radeon and intel use the exact same definition.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>

v2: Kill 2 more helpers in intel_dp.c that I've missed.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

radeon and intel use the exact same definition.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I want to move some dp link training helpers into this place, so in
the future this won't be just about i2c any longer.
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Move the cached EDID from intel_dp and intel_lvds_connector to
intel_connector. Unify cached EDID handling for LVDS and eDP, in
preparation for adding more generic EDID caching later.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The caller, not intel_connector_update_modes(), should free the edid. This
improves the reusability of intel_connector_update_modes().
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Pave the way for sharing some logic between eDP and LVDS.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Create a generic struct intel_panel for sharing a data structure and code
between eDP and LVDS panels. Add the new struct to intel_connector so that
later on we can have generic EDID and mode reading functions with EDID
caching that transparently fallback to fixed mode when EDID is not
available.

Add intel_panel as a dummy first, and move data (such as the mentioned
fixed mode) to it in later patches.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Fixup tiny conflict in intel_dp_destroy.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Since we do EDID caching in intel_dp_init, we can do the fixed mode
initialization there too. This should not change the functionality apart
from initializing fixed mode earlier. Particularly retain the behaviour of
only falling back to VBT if EDID is not available to not regress

commit 47f0eb22
Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 19 14:33:26 2011 -0700

    drm/i915: Only use VBT panel mode on eDP if no EDID is found
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As there is 1:1 mapping between encoder and connector for the LVDS, the
goal is to simply reduce the amount of noise within the connector
functions, i.e. we split the encoder/connector for LVDS as best we can and
try to only operate on the LVDS connector from the connector funcs and the
LVDS encoder form the encoder funcs.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Get rid of saved int_lvds_connector and int_edp_connector in
drm_i915_private.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Introduce a local structure to move LVDS specific information away from the
drm_i915_private and onto the LVDS connector.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In preparation for introducing intel_lvds_connector to move some of the
LVDS specific storage away from drm_i915_private, first rename the encoder
to avoid potential confusion.

Based on earlier work by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We were programming register 0x42020 twice on those platforms. Once
should be enough.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

With the consolidated registers, it appears that we're setting the same
bis several times. Let's just collect the bits we want to set and program
it once.

v2: More cleanup. Also program 0x42004 and 0x45000 for FBC on non
    mobile platforms (Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Undo the functional change as discussed on irc.]
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Register 0x42020 was defined twice under the names PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D and
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE. This patch consolidate the 2 sets of defines in one.

The transforms done are:

PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D    -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D
ILK_DSPCLK_GATE      -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D

DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPARB_CLK_GATE           -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFD_CLK_GATE           -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_CLK_FBC                 -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS1                -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
ILK_DPFC_DIS2               -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE

We have a VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE define for the pre-ILK DSPCLK_GATE_D.
Even if the same bit is used in ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D, other bits in the
register change, so I went with re-defining it, well more precisely rename
IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE, which is not specific to IVB+. So:

IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE       -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE
VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE (ILK+ code)

This commit is only a renaming commit, further commits will clean up the
logic.

v2: Rename bit 5 and 7 to _ENABLE as setting them to 1 enables clock
    gating on their respective units, contrary to all of the other bits
    (Paulo Zanoni)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Single-threaded forcewake was only used on some early pre-production
ivybridge machines, all the latest ones should use mt forcewake. And
we already assume this in other places of the code (e.g. DERRMR
support in the ddx, or the latest intel_gt_reset patch to reset any
lingering forcewake references left behind by the bios), so don't
bother here, too.
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This is the final remaining piece of Haswell DP enablement. After this
patch, just calling intel_dp_init on any port will make DP work. We
still do not do this because we're currently initializing HDMI on all
the ports, so if we replace intel_hdmi_init with intel_dp_init, we
will break HDMI, and we can't call both because they share the same
registers.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Previous patch "drm/i915: add basic Haswell DP link train bits"
implemented the basic structure to set the voltage levels and training
patterns. This patch adds the higher-level bits that are part of the
mode set sequence and hot plug.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We have to write the correct values inside intel_dp_set_m_n and then
prevent these values from being overwritten later.

V2: Unconfuse double negation.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Just a missing register. There is no problem to run this code when the
output is HDMI.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We should only write the DDI_BUF_CTL at this point for HDMI/DVI. For
DP we need to do this earlier, and the values written to the register
are also different.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The old rule that the AUX registers are just an offset (+4 and +10)
from output_reg is not true anymore, since output_reg in on the CPU
and some AUX regs are on the PCH.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: use the existing #defines as spotted by Damien Lespiau.]
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some BIOSes may forcibly suspend RC6 during their operation which
trigger a warning as we find the hardware in a perplexing state upon
first use. So far that appears to be the worst symptom as fortuituously
we use the same values as the BIOS for programming the FORCEWAKE register.
Reported-by: NOleksij Rempel <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We now no longer rely on this.

This is step 1 on a long journey to rid us of the save/restore
madness, which tends to lightly paper over many issues, and cause
tons of bad things itself ...
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: satisfy Paulo's ocd and drop the needless braces.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

... instead of relying on the register save/restore madness to do this.

To extract a bit of code call drm_mode_config_reset both on resume
and boot-up and move the hw state frobbing from the crt_init to the
->reset callback. The crt connector is the only one with a ->reset
callback, hence we can easily do this.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

... since they don't apply to pre-pch platforms and could actually be
harmful.
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>