Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 8月, 2018 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Interactive RPS mode · 027063b1
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      RPS provides a feedback loop where we use the load during the previous
evaluation interval to decide whether to up or down clock the GPU
frequency. Our responsiveness is split into 3 regimes, a high and low
plateau with the intent to keep the gpu clocked high to cover occasional
stalls under high load, and low despite occasional glitches under steady
low load, and inbetween. However, we run into situations like kodi where
we want to stay at low power (video decoding is done efficiently
inside the fixed function HW and doesn't need high clocks even for high
bitrate streams), but just occasionally the pipeline is more complex
than a video decode and we need a smidgen of extra GPU power to present
on time. In the high power regime, we sample at sub frame intervals with
a bias to upclocking, and conversely at low power we sample over a few
frames worth to provide what we consider to be the right levels of
responsiveness respectively. At low power, we more or less expect to be
kicked out to high power at the start of a busy sequence by waitboosting.

Prior to commit e9af4ea2 ("drm/i915: Avoid waitboosting on the active
request") whenever we missed the frame or stalled, we would immediate go
full throttle and upclock the GPU to max. But in commit e9af4ea2, we
relaxed the waitboosting to only apply if the pipeline was deep to avoid
over-committing resources for a near miss. Sadly though, a near miss is
still a miss, and perceptible as jitter in the frame delivery.

To try and prevent the near miss before having to resort to boosting
after the fact, we use the pageflip queue as an indication that we are
in an "interactive" regime and so should sample the load more frequently
to provide power before the frame misses it vblank. This will make us
more favorable to providing a small power increase (one or two bins) as
required rather than going all the way to maximum and then having to
work back down again. (We still keep the waitboosting mechanism around
just in case a dramatic change in system load requires urgent uplocking,
faster than we can provide in a few evaluation intervals.)

v2: Reduce rps_set_interactive to a boolean parameter to avoid the
confusion of what if they wanted a new power mode after pinning to a
different mode (which to choose?)
v3: Only reprogram RPS while the GT is awake, it will be set when we
wake the GT, and while off warns about being used outside of rpm.
v4: Fix deferred application of interactive mode
v5: s/state/interactive/
v6: Group the mutex with its principle in a substruct

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107111
Fixes: e9af4ea2 ("drm/i915: Avoid waitboosting on the active request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180731132629.3381-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 60548c554be2830d29d2533dad0ac8133347ee51)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      027063b1
    • R
      drm/i915: Fix psr sink status report. · 656921a5
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      First of all don't try to read dpcd if PSR is not even supported.

But also, if read failed return -EIO instead of reporting via a
backchannel.

v2: fix dev_priv: At this level m->private is the connector. (CI/DK)
    don't convert dpcd read errors to EIO. (DK)

Fixes: 5b7b3086 ("drm/i915/psr: Split sink status into a separate debugfs node")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180720003155.16290-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 7a72c78b)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      656921a5
  3. 19 7月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: Kill sink_crc for good · 5fd9df6a
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      It was originally introduced following the VESA spec in order to validate PSR.

However we found so many issues around sink_crc that instead of helping PSR
development it only brought another layer of trouble to the table.

So, sink_crc has been a black whole for us in question of time, effort and hope.

First of the problems is that HW statement is clear: "Do not attempt to use
aux communication with PSR enabled". So the main reason behind sink_crc is
already compromised.

For a while we had hope on the aux-mutex could workaround this problem on SKL+
platforms, but that mutex was not reliable, not tested,
and we shouldn't use according to HW engineers.

Also, nor source, nor sink designed and implemented the sink_crc to be used like
we are trying to use here.

Well, the sink side of things is also apparently not prepared for this
case. Each panel that we tried seemed to have a different behavior with same
code and same source.

So, for all the time we lost on trying to ducktape all these different issues
I believe it is now time to move PSR to a more reliable validation.
Maybe not a perfect one as we dreamed for this sink_crc, but at least more
reliable.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180705192528.30515-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
      5fd9df6a
  5. 13 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 09 7月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Provide a timeout to i915_gem_wait_for_idle() · ec625fb9
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Usually we have no idea about the upper bound we need to wait to catch
up with userspace when idling the device, but in a few situations we
know the system was idle beforehand and can provide a short timeout in
order to very quickly catch a failure, long before hangcheck kicks in.

In the following patches, we will use the timeout to curtain two overly
long waits, where we know we can expect the GPU to complete within a
reasonable time or declare it broken.

In particular, with a broken GPU we expect it to fail during the initial
GPU setup where do a couple of context switches to record the defaults.
This is a task that takes a few milliseconds even on the slowest of
devices, but we may have to wait 60s for hangcheck to give in and
declare the machine inoperable. In this a case where any gpu hang is
unacceptable, both from a timeliness and practical standpoint.

The other improvement is that in selftests, we do not need to arm an
independent timer to inject a wedge, as we can just limit the timeout on
the wait directly.

v2: Include the timeout parameter in the trace.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180709122044.7028-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      ec625fb9
  9. 06 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 03 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 29 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 15 6月, 2018 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Keep the ctx workarounds tightly packed · 548764bb
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      For each platform, we have a few registers that are rewritten with
different values -- they are not part of a sequence, just different parts
of a masked register set at different times (e.g. platform and gen
workarounds). Consolidate these into a single register write to keep the
table compact, important since we are running of room in the current
fixed sized buffer.

While adjusting the construction of the wa table, make it non fatal so
that the driver still loads but keeping the warning and extra details
for inspection.

Inspecting the changes for a Kabylake system,
Before:
	Address	val		mask		read
	0x07014	0x20002000	0x00002000	0x00002100
	0x0E194	0x01000100	0x00000100	0x00000114
	0x0E4F0	0x81008100	0x00008100	0xFFFF8120
	0x0E184	0x00200020	0x00000020	0x00000022
	0x0E194	0x00140014	0x00000014	0x00000114
	0x07004	0x00420042	0x00000042	0x000029C2
	0x0E188	0x00080000	0x00000008	0x00008030
	0x07300	0x80208020	0x00008020	0x00008830
	0x07300	0x00100010	0x00000010	0x00008830
	0x0E184	0x00020002	0x00000002	0x00000022
	0x0E180	0x20002000	0x00002000	0x00002000
	0x02580	0x00010000	0x00000001	0x00000004
	0x02580	0x00060004	0x00000006	0x00000004
	0x07014	0x01000100	0x00000100	0x00002100
	0x0E100	0x00100010	0x00000010	0x00008050

After:
	Address	val		mask		read
	0x02580	0x00070004	0x00000007	0x00000004
	0x07004	0x00420042	0x00000042	0x000029C2
	0x07014	0x21002100	0x00002100	0x00002100
	0x07300	0x80308030	0x00008030	0x00008830
	0x0E100	0x00100010	0x00000010	0x00008050
	0x0E180	0x20002000	0x00002000	0x00002000
	0x0E184	0x00220022	0x00000022	0x00000022
	0x0E188	0x00080000	0x00000008	0x00008030
	0x0E194	0x01140114	0x00000114	0x00000114
	0x0E4F0	0x81008100	0x00008100	0xFFFF8120
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180615120207.13952-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      548764bb
    • C
      drm/i915: Declare the driver wedged if hangcheck makes no progress · 1fd00c0f
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Hangcheck is our back up in case the GPU or the driver gets stuck. It
detects when the GPU is not making any progress and issues a GPU reset.
However, if the driver is failing to make any progress, we can get
ourselves into a situation where we continually try resetting the GPU to
no avail. Employ a second timeout such that if we continue to see the
same seqno (the stalled engine has made no progress at all) over the
course of several hangchecks, declare the driver wedged and attempt to
start afresh.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180602104853.17140-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      1fd00c0f
    • R
      drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back. · 5422b37c
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      The immediate enabling was actually not an issue for the
HW perspective for core platforms that have HW tracking.
HW will wait few identical idle frames before transitioning
to actual psr active anyways.

Now that we removed VLV/CHV out of the picture completely
we can safely remove any delays.

Note that this patch also remove the delayed activation
on HSW and BDW introduced by commit 'd0ac896a
("drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation.")'. This was
introduced to fix a blank screen on VLV/CHV and also
masked some frozen screens on other core platforms.
Probably the same that we are now properly hunting and fixing.

v2:(DK): Remove unnecessary WARN_ONs and make some other
         VLV | CHV more readable.
v3: Do it regardless the timer rework.
v4: (DK/CI): Add VLV || CHV check on cancel work at psr_disable.
v5: Kill remaining items and fully rework activation functions.
v6: Rebase on top of VLV/CHV clean-up and keep the reactivation
    on a regular non-delayed work to avoid extra delays on exit
    calls and allow us to add few more safety checks before
    real activation.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180613192600.3955-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
      5422b37c
  17. 12 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  19. 06 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  21. 01 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 24 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  25. 22 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  27. 18 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  29. 08 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915/icl: add basic support for the ICL clocks · c27e917e
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      This commit introduces the definitions for the ICL clocks and adds the
basic functions to the shared DPLL framework. It adds code for the
Enable and Disable sequences for some PLLs, but it does not have the
code to compute the actual PLL values, which are marked as TODO
comments and should be introduced as separate commits.

Special thanks to James Ausmus for investigating and fixing a bug with
the placement of icl_unmap_plls_to_ports() function.

v2:
 - Rebase around dpll_lock changes.
v3:
 - The spec now says what the timeouts should be.
 - Touch DPCLKA_CFGCR0_ICL at the appropriate time so we don't freeze
   the machine.
 - Checkpatch found a white space problem.
 - Small adjustments before upstreaming.
v4:
 - Move the ICL checks out of the *map_plls_to_ports() functions
  (James)
 - Add extra encoder check (James)
 - Call icl_unmap_plls_to_ports() later (James)
v5:
 - Rebase after the pll struct changes.
v6:
 - Properly make the unmap function based on encoders_post_disable()
   with regarding to checks and iterators.
 - Address checkpatch comment on "min = max = x()".

Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180427231436.9353-1-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
      c27e917e
  31. 30 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  33. 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  35. 25 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  37. 21 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  39. 15 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Check whitelist registers across resets · f4ecfbfc
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Add a selftest to ensure that we restore the whitelisted registers after
rewrite the registers everytime they might be scrubbed, e.g. module
load, reset and resume. For the other volatile workaround registers, we
export their presence via debugfs and check in igt/gem_workarounds.
However, we don't export the whitelist and rather than do so, let's test
them directly in the kernel.

The test we use is to read the registers back from the CS (this helps us
be sure that the registers will be valid for MI_LRI etc). In order to
generate the expected list, we split intel_whitelist_workarounds_emit
into two phases, the first to build the list and the second to apply.
Inside the test, we only build the list and then check that list against
the hw.

v2: Filter out pre-gen8 as they do not have RING_NONPRIV.
v3: Drop unused engine parameter, no plans to use it now or future.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180414122754.569-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f4ecfbfc
  41. 10 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  43. 06 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 31 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  47. 28 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  49. 20 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  51. 19 3月, 2018 4 次提交
  53. 16 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  55. 15 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  57. 14 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  59. 13 3月, 2018 1 次提交