- 27 9月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add a higher level abstraction than the rpc_ops for callback operations. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Split out initializing the nfs4_callback structure from using it. For the NULL callback this gets rid of tons of pointless re-initializations. Note that I don't quite understand what protects us from running multiple NULL callbacks at the same time, but at least this chance doesn't make it worse.. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add a helper to queue up a callback. CB_NULL has a bit of special casing because it is special in the specification, but all other new callback operations will be able to share code with this and a few more changes to refactor the callback code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We can always get at the private data by using container_of, no need for a void pointer. Also introduce a little to_delegation helper to avoid opencoding the container_of everywhere. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In a later patch, we want to add a flag that will allow us to reduce the need for upcalls. In order to handle that correctly, we'll need to ensure that racing upcalls for the same client can't occur. In practice it should be rare for this to occur with a well-behaved client, but it is possible. Convert one of the bits in the cl_flags field to be an upcall bitlock, and use it to ensure that upcalls for the same client are serialized. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Allow a privileged userland process to end the v4 grace period early. Writing "Y", "y", or "1" to the file will cause the v4 grace period to be lifted. The basic idea with this will be to allow the userland client tracking program to lift the grace period once it knows that no more clients will be reclaiming state. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Since it's stored in nfsd_net, we don't need to pass it in separately. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Add some comments that describe what each of these objects is, and how they related to one another. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 05 8月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Remove the old nfsd_for_n_state function and move nfsd_find_client higher up into the file to get rid of forward declaration. Remove the struct nfsd_fault_inject_op arguments from the operations as they are no longer needed by any of them. Finally, remove the old "standard" get and set routines, which also eliminates the client_mutex from this code. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...instead of relying on the client_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...instead of relying on the client_mutex. Also, fix up the printk output that is generated when the file is read. It currently says that it's reporting the number of open files, but it's actually reporting the number of openowners. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...instead of relying on the client_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...which uses the client_lock for protection instead of client_mutex. Also remove nfsd_forget_client as there are no more callers. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...that relies on the client_lock instead of client_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Add a new "get" routine for forget_clients that relies on the client_lock instead of the client_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 01 8月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Preparation for removing the client_mutex. Convert the open owner hash table into a per-client table and protect it using the nfs4_client->cl_lock spin lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Change it so that only openstateids hold persistent references to openowners. References can still be held by compounds in progress. With this, we can get rid of NFS4_OO_NEW. It's possible that we will create a new openowner in the process of doing the open, but something later fails. In the meantime, another task could find that openowner and start using it on a successful open. If that occurs we don't necessarily want to tear it down, just put the reference that the failing compound holds. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Allow stateowners to be unhashed and destroyed when the last reference is put. The unhashing must be idempotent. In a future patch, we'll add some locking around it, but for now it's only protected by the client_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We don't want to rely on the client_mutex for protection in the case of NFSv4 open owners. Instead, we add a mutex that will only be taken for NFSv4.0 state mutating operations, and that will be released once the entire compound is done. Also, ensure that nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay/nfsd4_cstate_clear_replay take a reference to the stateowner when they are using it for NFSv4.0 open and lock replay caching. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The way stateowners are managed today is somewhat awkward. They need to be explicitly destroyed, even though the stateids reference them. This will be particularly problematic when we remove the client_mutex. We may create a new stateowner and attempt to open a file or set a lock, and have that fail. In the meantime, another RPC may come in that uses that same stateowner and succeed. We can't have the first task tearing down the stateowner in that situation. To fix this, we need to change how stateowners are tracked altogether. Refcount them and only destroy them once all stateids that reference them have been destroyed. This patch starts by adding the refcounting necessary to do that. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
All stateids are associated with a nfs4_file. Let's consolidate. Replace delegation->dl_file with the dl_stid.sc_file, and nfs4_ol_stateid->st_file with st_stid.sc_file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we remove the client_mutex, we'll need to be able to ensure that these objects aren't destroyed while we're not holding locks. Add a ->free() callback to the struct nfs4_stid, so that we can release a reference to the stid without caring about the contents. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Now that the nfs4_file has a filehandle in it, we no longer need to keep a per-delegation copy of it. Switch to using the one in the nfs4_file instead. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Remove the fi_inode field in struct nfs4_file in order to remove the possibility of struct nfs4_file pinning the inode when it does not have any open state. The only place we still need to get to an inode is in check_for_locks, so change it to use find_any_file and use the inode from any that it finds. If it doesn't find one, then just assume there aren't any. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
For use when we may not have a struct inode. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 22 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We will want to add reference counting to the lock stateid and open stateids too in later patches. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 7月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add an extra delegation state to allow the stateid to remain in the idr tree until the last reference has been released. This will be necessary to ensure uniqueness once the client_mutex is removed. [jlayton: reset the sc_type under the state_lock in unhash_delegation] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
state_lock is a heavily contended global lock. We don't want to grab that while simultaneously holding the inode->i_lock. Add a new per-nfs4_file lock that we can use to protect the per-nfs4_file delegation list. Hold that while walking the list in the break_deleg callback and queue the workqueue job for each one. The workqueue job can then take the state_lock and do the list manipulations without the i_lock being held prior to starting the rpc call. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
It's just an obfuscated INIT_WORK call. Just make the work_func_t a non-static symbol and use a normal INIT_WORK call. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The current enforcement of deny modes is both inefficient and scattered across several places, which makes it hard to guarantee atomicity. The inefficiency is a problem now, and the lack of atomicity will mean races once the client_mutex is removed. First, we address the inefficiency. We have to track deny modes on a per-stateid basis to ensure that open downgrades are sane, but when the server goes to enforce them it has to walk the entire list of stateids and check against each one. Instead of doing that, maintain a per-nfs4_file deny mode. When a file is opened, we simply set any deny bits in that mode that were specified in the OPEN call. We can then use that unified deny mode to do a simple check to see whether there are any conflicts without needing to walk the entire stateid list. The only time we'll need to walk the entire list of stateids is when a stateid that has a deny mode on it is being released, or one is having its deny mode downgraded. In that case, we must walk the entire list and recalculate the fi_share_deny field. Since deny modes are pretty rare today, this should be very rare under normal workloads. To address the potential for races once the client_mutex is removed, protect fi_share_deny with the fi_lock. In nfs4_get_vfs_file, check to make sure that any deny mode we want to apply won't conflict with existing access. If that's ok, then have nfs4_file_get_access check that new access to the file won't conflict with existing deny modes. If that also passes, then get file access references, set the correct access and deny bits in the stateid, and update the fi_share_deny field. If opening the file or truncating it fails, then unwind the whole mess and return the appropriate error. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We never use anything above bit #3, so an unsigned long for each is wasteful. Shrink them to a char each, and add some WARN_ON_ONCE calls if we try to set or clear bits that would go outside those sizes. Note too that because atomic bitops work on unsigned longs, we have to abandon their use here. That shouldn't be a problem though since we don't really care about the atomicity in this code anyway. Using them was just a convenient way to flip bits. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Preparation for removal of the client_mutex, which currently protects this array. While we don't actually need the find_*_file_locked variants just yet, a later patch will. So go ahead and add them now to reduce future churn in this code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Access to this list is currently serialized by the client_mutex. Add finer grained locking around this list in preparation for its removal. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
lookup_clientid is preferable to find_confirmed_client since it's able to use the cached client in the compound state. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client were to disappear from underneath us while we're holding a session reference, things would be bad. This cleanup helps ensure that it cannot, which will be a possibility when the client_mutex is removed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Now that we know that we won't have several lockowners with the same, owner->data, we can simplify nfsd4_release_lockowner and get rid of the lo_list in the process. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Just like open-owners, lock-owners are associated with a name, a clientid and, in the case of minor version 0, a sequence id. There is no association to a file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 09 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In the NFSv4 spec, lock stateids are per-file objects. Lockowners are not. This patch replaces the current list of lock owners in the open stateids with a list of lock stateids. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-