- 13 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
More fscrypt definitions are being added, and we shouldn't use a disproportionate amount of space in <linux/fs.h> for fscrypt stuff. So move the fscrypt definitions to a new header <linux/fscrypt.h>. For source compatibility with existing userspace programs, <linux/fs.h> still includes the new header. Reviewed-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2019 6 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Rename fscrypt_decrypt_page() to fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() and redefine its behavior to decrypt all filesystem blocks in the given region of the given page, rather than assuming that the region consists of just one filesystem block. Also remove the 'inode' and 'lblk_num' parameters, since they can be retrieved from the page as it's already assumed to be a pagecache page. This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with blocksize != PAGE_SIZE. This is based on work by Chandan Rajendra. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Currently fscrypt_decrypt_page() does one of two logically distinct things depending on whether FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES is set in the filesystem's fscrypt_operations: decrypt a pagecache page in-place, or decrypt a filesystem block in-place in any page. Currently these happen to share the same implementation, but this conflates the notion of blocks and pages. It also makes it so that all callers have to provide inode and lblk_num, when fscrypt could determine these itself for pagecache pages. Therefore, move the FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES behavior into a new function fscrypt_decrypt_block_inplace(). This mirrors fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace(). This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with blocksize != PAGE_SIZE. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Rename fscrypt_encrypt_page() to fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() and redefine its behavior to encrypt all filesystem blocks from the given region of the given page, rather than assuming that the region consists of just one filesystem block. Also remove the 'inode' and 'lblk_num' parameters, since they can be retrieved from the page as it's already assumed to be a pagecache page. This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with blocksize != PAGE_SIZE. This is based on work by Chandan Rajendra. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt_encrypt_page() behaves very differently depending on whether the filesystem set FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES in its fscrypt_operations. This makes the function difficult to understand and document. It also makes it so that all callers have to provide inode and lblk_num, when fscrypt could determine these itself for pagecache pages. Therefore, move the FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES behavior into a new function fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace(). This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with blocksize != PAGE_SIZE. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Now that fscrypt_ctx is not used for writes, remove the 'w' fields. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Currently, bounce page handling for writes to encrypted files is unnecessarily complicated. A fscrypt_ctx is allocated along with each bounce page, page_private(bounce_page) points to this fscrypt_ctx, and fscrypt_ctx::w::control_page points to the original pagecache page. However, because writes don't use the fscrypt_ctx for anything else, there's no reason why page_private(bounce_page) can't just point to the original pagecache page directly. Therefore, this patch makes this change. In the process, it also cleans up the API exposed to filesystems that allows testing whether a page is a bounce page, getting the pagecache page from a bounce page, and freeing a bounce page. Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sascha Hauer 提交于
ifdefs reduce readablity and compile coverage. This removes the ifdefs around CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION by using IS_ENABLED and relying on static inline wrappers. A new static inline wrapper for setting sb->s_cop is introduced to allow filesystems to unconditionally compile in their s_cop operations. Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 18 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Path lookups that traverse encrypted symlink(s) are very slow because each encrypted symlink needs to be decrypted each time it's followed. This also involves dropping out of rcu-walk mode. Make encrypted symlinks faster by caching the decrypted symlink target in ->i_link. The first call to fscrypt_get_symlink() sets it. Then, the existing VFS path lookup code uses the non-NULL ->i_link to take the fast path where ->get_link() isn't called, and lookups in rcu-walk mode remain in rcu-walk mode. Also set ->i_link immediately when a new encrypted symlink is created. To safely free the symlink target after an RCU grace period has elapsed, introduce a new function fscrypt_free_inode(), and make the relevant filesystems call it just before actually freeing the inode. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 4月, 2019 6 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows: 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name via d_flags. 2. fscrypt_setup_filename(): a. Try to load the directory's encryption key. b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name. But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext name even though it was actually treated as plaintext. This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup, potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext path, which should remain valid now that the key was added. Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still, the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected. Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update. Fixes: 28b4c263 ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Make __d_move() clear DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME on the source dentry. This is needed for when d_splice_alias() moves a directory's encrypted alias to its decrypted alias as a result of the encryption key being added. Otherwise, the decrypted alias will incorrectly be invalidated on the next lookup, causing problems such as unmounting a mount the user just mount()ed there. Note that we don't have to support arbitrary moves of this flag because fscrypt doesn't allow dentries with DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME to be the source or target of a rename(). Fixes: 28b4c263 ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing the key") Reported-by: NSarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Close some race conditions where fscrypt allowed rename() and link() on ciphertext dentries that had been looked up just prior to the key being concurrently added. It's better to return -ENOKEY in this case. This avoids doing the nonsensical thing of encrypting the names a second time when searching for the actual on-disk dir entries. It also guarantees that DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME dentries are never rename()d, so the dcache won't have support all possible combinations of moving DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME around during __d_move(). Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Make various improvements to fscrypt dentry revalidation: - Don't try to handle the case where the per-directory key is removed, as this can't happen without the inode (and dentries) being evicted. - Flag ciphertext dentries rather than plaintext dentries, since it's ciphertext dentries that need the special handling. - Avoid doing unnecessary work for non-ciphertext dentries. - When revalidating ciphertext dentries, try to set up the directory's i_crypt_info to make sure the key is really still absent, rather than invalidating all negative dentries as the previous code did. An old comment suggested we can't do this for locking reasons, but AFAICT this comment was outdated and it actually works fine. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
->i_crypt_info starts out NULL and may later be locklessly set to a non-NULL value by the cmpxchg() in fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). But ->i_crypt_info is used directly, which technically is incorrect. It's a data race, and it doesn't include the data dependency barrier needed to safely dereference the pointer on at least one architecture. Fix this by using READ_ONCE() instead. Note: we don't need to use smp_load_acquire(), since dereferencing the pointer only requires a data dependency barrier, which is already included in READ_ONCE(). We also don't need READ_ONCE() in places where ->i_crypt_info is unconditionally dereferenced, since it must have already been checked. Also downgrade the cmpxchg() to cmpxchg_release(), since RELEASE semantics are sufficient on the write side. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The only reason the inode is being passed to fscrypt_get_ctx() is to verify that the encryption key is available. However, all callers already ensure this because if we get as far as trying to do I/O to an encrypted file without the key, there's already a bug. Therefore, remove this unnecessary argument. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
In order to have a common code base for fscrypt "post read" processing for all filesystems which support encryption, this commit removes filesystem specific build config option (e.g. CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION) and replaces it with a build option (i.e. CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION) whose value affects all the filesystems making use of fscrypt. Reviewed-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
-
- 12 1月, 2018 10 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Now that all filesystems have been converted to use the symlink helper functions, they no longer need the declaration of 'struct fscrypt_symlink_data'. Move it from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_private.h. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Currently, filesystems supporting fscrypt need to implement some tricky logic when creating encrypted symlinks, including handling a peculiar on-disk format (struct fscrypt_symlink_data) and correctly calculating the size of the encrypted symlink. Introduce helper functions to make things a bit easier: - fscrypt_prepare_symlink() computes and validates the size the symlink target will require on-disk. - fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() creates the encrypted target if needed. The new helpers actually fix some subtle bugs. First, when checking whether the symlink target was too long, filesystems didn't account for the fact that the NUL padding is meant to be truncated if it would cause the maximum length to be exceeded, as is done for filenames in directories. Consequently users would receive ENAMETOOLONG when creating symlinks close to what is supposed to be the maximum length. For example, with EXT4 with a 4K block size, the maximum symlink target length in an encrypted directory is supposed to be 4093 bytes (in comparison to 4095 in an unencrypted directory), but in FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32-mode only up to 4064 bytes were accepted. Second, symlink targets of "." and ".." were not being encrypted, even though they should be, as these names are special in *directory entries* but not in symlink targets. Fortunately, we can fix this simply by starting to encrypt them, as old kernels already accept them in encrypted form. Third, the output string length the filesystems were providing when doing the actual encryption was incorrect, as it was forgotten to exclude 'sizeof(struct fscrypt_symlink_data)'. Fortunately though, this bug didn't make a difference. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt.h included way too many other headers, given that it is included by filesystems both with and without encryption support. Trim down the includes list by moving the needed includes into more appropriate places, and removing the unneeded ones. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Only fs/crypto/fname.c cares about treating the "." and ".." filenames specially with regards to encryption, so move fscrypt_is_dot_dotdot() from fscrypt.h to there. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The encryption modes are validated by fs/crypto/, not by individual filesystems. Therefore, move fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_private.h. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Filesystems now only define their fscrypt_operations when they are compiled with encryption support, so move the fscrypt_operations declaration from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_supp.h. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled() accesses ->s_cop, which now is only set when the filesystem is built with encryption support. This didn't actually matter because no filesystems called it. However, it will start being used soon, so fix it by moving it from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_supp.h and stubbing it out in fscrypt_notsupp.h. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Filesystems only ever access 'struct fscrypt_ctx' through fscrypt functions. But when a filesystem is built without encryption support, these functions are all stubbed out, so the declaration of fscrypt_ctx is unneeded. Therefore, move it from fscrypt.h to fscrypt_supp.h. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt_control_page() is already split into two versions depending on whether the filesystem is being built with encryption support or not. Move them into the appropriate headers. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt_has_encryption_key() is already split into two versions depending on whether the filesystem is being built with encryption support or not. Move them into the appropriate headers. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 19 10月, 2017 7 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Introduce a helper function for filesystems to call when processing ->setattr() on a possibly-encrypted inode. It handles enforcing that an encrypted file can only be truncated if its encryption key is available. Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Introduce a helper function which prepares to look up the given dentry in the given directory. If the directory is encrypted, it handles loading the directory's encryption key, setting the dentry's ->d_op to fscrypt_d_ops, and setting DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_WITH_KEY if the directory's encryption key is available. Note: once all filesystems switch over to this, we'll be able to move fscrypt_d_ops and fscrypt_set_encrypted_dentry() to fscrypt_private.h. Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Introduce a helper function which prepares to rename a file into a possibly encrypted directory. It handles loading the encryption keys for the source and target directories if needed, and it handles enforcing that if the target directory (and the source directory for a cross-rename) is encrypted, then the file being moved into the directory has the same encryption policy as its containing directory. Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Introduce a helper function which prepares to link an inode into a possibly-encrypted directory. It handles setting up the target directory's encryption key, then verifying that the link won't violate the constraint that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy. Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Add a helper function which checks if an inode is encrypted, and if so, tries to set up its encryption key. This is a pattern which is duplicated in multiple places in each of ext4, f2fs, and ubifs --- for example, when a regular file is asked to be opened or truncated. Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Now that all callers of fscrypt_operations.is_encrypted() have been switched to IS_ENCRYPTED(), remove ->is_encrypted(). Reviewed-by: NChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Acked-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
Filesystems have to include different header files based on whether they are compiled with encryption support or not. That's nasty and messy. Instead, rationalise the headers so we have a single include fscrypt.h and let it decide what internal implementation to include based on the __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION define. Filesystems set __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION to 1 before including linux/fscrypt.h if they are built with encryption support. Otherwise, they must set __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION to 0. Add guards to prevent fscrypt_supp.h and fscrypt_notsupp.h from being directly included by filesystems. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> [EB: use 1 and 0 rather than defined/undefined] Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tahsin Erdogan 提交于
ea_inode feature allows creating extended attributes that are up to 64k in size. Update __ext4_new_inode() to pick increased credit limits. To avoid overallocating too many journal credits, update __ext4_xattr_set_credits() to make a distinction between xattr create vs update. This helps __ext4_new_inode() because all attributes are known to be new, so we can save credits that are normally needed to delete old values. Also, have fscrypt specify its maximum context size so that we don't end up allocating credits for 64k size. Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
This makes it consistent with ->is_encrypted(), ->empty_dir(), and fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled(). Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Daniel Walter 提交于
fscrypt provides facilities to use different encryption algorithms which are selectable by userspace when setting the encryption policy. Currently, only AES-256-XTS for file contents and AES-256-CBC-CTS for file names are implemented. This is a clear case of kernel offers the mechanism and userspace selects a policy. Similar to what dm-crypt and ecryptfs have. This patch adds support for using AES-128-CBC for file contents and AES-128-CBC-CTS for file name encryption. To mitigate watermarking attacks, IVs are generated using the ESSIV algorithm. While AES-CBC is actually slightly less secure than AES-XTS from a security point of view, there is more widespread hardware support. Using AES-CBC gives us the acceptable performance while still providing a moderate level of security for persistent storage. Especially low-powered embedded devices with crypto accelerators such as CAAM or CESA often only support AES-CBC. Since using AES-CBC over AES-XTS is basically thought of a last resort, we use AES-128-CBC over AES-256-CBC since it has less encryption rounds and yields noticeable better performance starting from a file size of just a few kB. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Walter <dwalter@sigma-star.at> [david@sigma-star.at: addressed review comments] Signed-off-by: NDavid Gstir <david@sigma-star.at> Reviewed-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
fscrypt_symlink_data_len() is never called and can be removed. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The only use of the ->prepare_context() fscrypt operation was to allow ext4 to evict inline data from the inode before ->set_context(). However, there is no reason why this cannot be done as simply the first step in ->set_context(), and in fact it makes more sense to do it that way because then the policy modes and flags get validated before any real work is done. Therefore, merge ext4_prepare_context() into ext4_set_context(), and remove ->prepare_context(). Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Previously, each filesystem configured without encryption support would define all the public fscrypt functions to their notsupp_* stubs. This list of #defines had to be updated in every filesystem whenever a change was made to the public fscrypt functions. To make things more maintainable now that we have three filesystems using fscrypt, split the old header fscrypto.h into several new headers. fscrypt_supp.h contains the real declarations and is included by filesystems when configured with encryption support, whereas fscrypt_notsupp.h contains the inline stubs and is included by filesystems when configured without encryption support. fscrypt_common.h contains common declarations needed by both. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-