These instructions were placed in the code directly as opcodes because
early compilers didn't support them. Toolchains supporting ARMv7
understand these instructions and the patch puts the mnemonics back.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

There is no point converting memory bank addresses from physical to
virtual just to convert them back to physical addresses.  Furthermore
this isn't "right" for highmem even if in this case the end result is
the correct one.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Enable Sparsemem support for LH7A40x SoCs, while still allowing the
existing discontig support for the time being.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Tested on Assabet, and Assabet with Neponset's SDRAM at 3328M phys.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

... including some comments about the ordering required to bring
sparsemem up.  You have to repeatedly guess, test, reguess, try
again and again to work out what the right ordering is.  Many
hours later...
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Provide helpers for getting physical addresses or pfns from the
meminfo array, and use them.  Move for_each_nodebank() to
asm/setup.h alongside the meminfo structure definition.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

There's no point scattering this around the tree, the parsing
of the parameter might as well live beside the code which uses
it.  That also means we can make vmalloc_reserve a static
variable.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The newly introduced sanity_check_meminfo() function should be
used to collect all validation of the meminfo array, which we
have in bootmem_init().  Move it there.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The PTRS_PER_PMD != 1 condition can be evaluated with C code and
optimized at compile time.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

There is no use of this in the whole tree.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The current -march=armv7a is not supported by mainline gcc.

Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Wei Zhong <weizhong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

... to prevent people being mislead.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

As per the dma_unmap_* calls, we don't touch the cache when a DMA
buffer transitions from device to CPU ownership.  Presently, no
problems have been identified with speculative cache prefetching
which in itself is a new feature in later architectures.  We may
have to revisit the DMA API later for these architectures anyway.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Validate the direction argument like x86 does.  In addition,
validate the dma_unmap_* parameters against those passed to
dma_map_* when using the DMA bounce code.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The dmabounce dma_sync_xxx() implementation have been broken for
quite some time; they all copy data between the DMA buffer and
the CPU visible buffer no irrespective of the change of ownership.
(IOW, a DMA_FROM_DEVICE mapping copies data from the DMA buffer
to the CPU buffer during a call to dma_sync_single_for_device().)

Fix it by getting rid of sync_single(), moving the contents into
the recently created dmabounce_sync_for_xxx() functions and adjusting
appropriately.

This also makes it possible to properly support the DMA range sync
functions.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

No point having two of these; dma_map_page() can do all the work
for us.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

We can translate a struct page directly to a DMA address using
page_to_dma().  No need to use page_address() followed by
virt_to_dma().
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Update the ARM DMA scatter gather APIs for the scatterlist changes.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This replaces the original cache type decoding printks.  We now
indicate how we're treating the cache which we found, rather
than what we found.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Rather than trying to (inaccurately) decode the cache type from the
registers each time we need to decide what type of cache we have,
use a bitmask initialized early during boot.

Since the setup is a one-off initialization, we can be a little more
clever and take account of the CPU architecture as well.

Note that we continue to achieve the compactness on optimised kernels
by forcing tests to always-false or always-true as appropriate, thereby
allowing the compiler to do build-time code elimination.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The cache type register found in ARMv5 and later CPUs changes format
and meaning depending on the CPU architecture version.  Currently,
this code:
a) doesn't work for everything - Xscale's are identified as
   'unknown 5'.
b) is not able to tell whether the caches are VIVT or VIPT from the
   cache type.
c) prints rubbish on some ARMv6 and ARMv7+ CPUs.

The two solutions to this are:
1. Add yet more code to decode and print the various different register
   formats.
2. Remove the code altogther.

The code only exists to decode and print the cache parameters.
Increasing the complexity of it just for the sake of a few prinks
isn't worth it.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.27-rc5/iop13xx_defconfig/zimage.log

Occurrences  Warning text
339  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h:40: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
203  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h:45: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast
Acked-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This allows assembly files to be crafted to cover all ARM CPU types
rather than erroring out on instructions only in later CPUs.  We
are careful in these files to only execute CPU specific code when
the CPU ID says we can.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

... some of which are now in linux/*.h headers.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This quietens some sparse warnings about phys_initrd_start and
phys_initrd_size.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

pc_pointer() was a function to mask the PC for 26-bit ARMs, which
we no longer support.  Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

arch/arm/kernel/process.c:270:6: warning: symbol 'show_fpregs' was not declared. Should it be static?

This function isn't used, so can be removed.

arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:532:9: warning: symbol 'len' shadows an earlier one
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:524:6: originally declared here

A function containing two 'len's.

arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c:188:13: warning: symbol 'check_writebuffer_bugs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:122:5: warning: symbol 'valid_phys_addr_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:137:5: warning: symbol 'valid_mmap_phys_addr_range' was not declared. Should it be static?

Missing includes.

arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:71:77: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c:355:46: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)

Sillies.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Since the other assembly functions do not seem to save the frame
pointer onto the stack, this patch changes the csum_partial_copy_*
functions to behave in the same way.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The post-index immediate value is optional if it is 0 and this patch
removes it. The reason is to allow such instructions to compile to
Thumb-2 where only pre-indexed LDRT/STRT instructions are allowed.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>