bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair

In bfq_insert_request() we unlock bfqd->lock only to call
trace_block_rq_insert() and then lock bfqd->lock again. This is really
pointless since tracing is disabled if we really care about performance
and even if the tracepoint is enabled, it is a quick call.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: N"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-5-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

block/bfq-iosched.c

@@ -6150,11 +6150,8 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
-
 	trace_block_rq_insert(rq);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 	bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq);
 	if (!bfqq || at_head) {
 		if (at_head)