memblock: don't silently align size in memblock_virt_alloc()

In original __alloc_memory_core_early() for bootmem wrapper, we do not
align size silently.

We should not do that, as later free with old size will leave some range
not freed.

It's obvious that code is copied from memblock_base_nid(), and that code
is wrong for the same reason.

Also remove that in memblock_alloc_base.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/memblock.c

@@ -984,9 +984,6 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 	if (!align)
 		align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
 
-	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
-	size = round_up(size, align);
-
 	found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid);
 	if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size))
 		return found;
@@ -1080,9 +1077,6 @@ static void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_internal(
 	if (!align)
 		align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
 
-	/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
-	size = round_up(size, align);
-
 again:
 	alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr, max_addr,
 					    nid);