提交 f92b9826 编写于 作者: A Artem Bityutskiy

UBIFS: fix checkpatch.pl warnings

These are mostly long lines and wrong indentation warning
fixes. But also there are two volatile variables and
checkpatch.pl complains about them:

WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
+       volatile int gc_seq;

WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
+       volatile int gced_lnum;

Well, we anyway use smp_wmb() for c->gc_seq and c->gced_lnum, so
these 'volatile' modifiers can be just dropped.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
上级 6a4a9b43
......@@ -703,7 +703,8 @@ void dbg_dump_lpt_info(struct ubifs_info *c)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "\tLPT root is at %d:%d\n", c->lpt_lnum, c->lpt_offs);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "\tLPT head is at %d:%d\n",
c->nhead_lnum, c->nhead_offs);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "\tLPT ltab is at %d:%d\n", c->ltab_lnum, c->ltab_offs);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "\tLPT ltab is at %d:%d\n",
c->ltab_lnum, c->ltab_offs);
if (c->big_lpt)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "\tLPT lsave is at %d:%d\n",
c->lsave_lnum, c->lsave_offs);
......
......@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ static int read_block(struct inode *inode, void *addr, unsigned int block,
return err;
}
ubifs_assert(le64_to_cpu(dn->ch.sqnum) > ubifs_inode(inode)->creat_sqnum);
ubifs_assert(le64_to_cpu(dn->ch.sqnum) >
ubifs_inode(inode)->creat_sqnum);
len = le32_to_cpu(dn->size);
if (len <= 0 || len > UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE)
goto dump;
......
......@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ int ubifs_jnl_truncate(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *inode,
data_key_init(c, &key, inum, blk);
bit = old_size & (UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
blk = (old_size >> UBIFS_BLOCK_SHIFT) - (bit ? 0: 1);
blk = (old_size >> UBIFS_BLOCK_SHIFT) - (bit ? 0 : 1);
data_key_init(c, &to_key, inum, blk);
err = ubifs_tnc_remove_range(c, &key, &to_key);
......
......@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int write_cnodes(struct ubifs_info *c)
no_space:
ubifs_err("LPT out of space mismatch");
dbg_err("LPT out of space mismatch at LEB %d:%d needing %d, done_ltab "
"%d, done_lsave %d", lnum, offs, len, done_ltab, done_lsave);
"%d, done_lsave %d", lnum, offs, len, done_ltab, done_lsave);
dbg_dump_lpt_info(c);
dbg_dump_lpt_lebs(c);
dump_stack();
......
......@@ -2245,12 +2245,11 @@ int ubifs_tnc_replace(struct ubifs_info *c, const union ubifs_key *key,
if (found) {
/* Ensure the znode is dirtied */
if (znode->cnext || !ubifs_zn_dirty(znode)) {
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c,
znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c, znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
}
zbr = &znode->zbranch[n];
lnc_free(zbr);
......@@ -2317,11 +2316,11 @@ int ubifs_tnc_add_nm(struct ubifs_info *c, const union ubifs_key *key,
/* Ensure the znode is dirtied */
if (znode->cnext || !ubifs_zn_dirty(znode)) {
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c, znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c, znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
}
if (found == 1) {
......@@ -2627,11 +2626,11 @@ int ubifs_tnc_remove_range(struct ubifs_info *c, union ubifs_key *from_key,
/* Ensure the znode is dirtied */
if (znode->cnext || !ubifs_zn_dirty(znode)) {
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c, znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
znode = dirty_cow_bottom_up(c, znode);
if (IS_ERR(znode)) {
err = PTR_ERR(znode);
goto out_unlock;
}
}
/* Remove all keys in range except the first */
......
......@@ -481,8 +481,8 @@ struct ubifs_lprops {
struct ubifs_lpt_lprops {
int free;
int dirty;
unsigned tgc : 1;
unsigned cmt : 1;
unsigned tgc:1;
unsigned cmt:1;
};
/**
......@@ -1322,8 +1322,8 @@ struct ubifs_info {
void *sbuf;
struct list_head idx_gc;
int idx_gc_cnt;
volatile int gc_seq;
volatile int gced_lnum;
int gc_seq;
int gced_lnum;
struct list_head infos_list;
struct mutex umount_mutex;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册