block, bfq: cleanup bfq_activate_requeue_entity()

Just make the code a litter cleaner by removing the unnecessary
variable 'sd'.
Signed-off-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221102022542.3621219-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

block/bfq-wf2q.c

@@ -1052,12 +1052,12 @@ static void __bfq_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity)
 }
 
 static void __bfq_activate_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
-					  struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
 					  bool non_blocking_wait_rq)
 {
 	struct bfq_service_tree *st = bfq_entity_service_tree(entity);
 
-	if (sd->in_service_entity == entity || entity->tree == &st->active)
+	if (entity->sched_data->in_service_entity == entity ||
+	    entity->tree == &st->active)
 		 /*
 		  * in service or already queued on the active tree,
 		  * requeue or reposition
@@ -1089,14 +1089,10 @@ static void bfq_activate_requeue_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
 					bool non_blocking_wait_rq,
 					bool requeue, bool expiration)
 {
-	struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
-
 	for_each_entity(entity) {
-		sd = entity->sched_data;
-		__bfq_activate_requeue_entity(entity, sd, non_blocking_wait_rq);
-
-		if (!bfq_update_next_in_service(sd, entity, expiration) &&
-		    !requeue)
+		__bfq_activate_requeue_entity(entity, non_blocking_wait_rq);
+		if (!bfq_update_next_in_service(entity->sched_data, entity,
+						expiration) && !requeue)
 			break;
 	}
 }