提交 f3e5a857 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig 提交者: Michael Ellerman

cxl: drop the dma_set_mask callback from vphb

The CXL code never even looks at the dma mask, so there is no good
reason for this sanity check.  Remove it because it gets in the way
of the dma ops refactoring.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: NAndrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
上级 44a0337b
......@@ -11,17 +11,6 @@
#include <misc/cxl.h>
#include "cxl.h"
static int cxl_dma_set_mask(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 dma_mask)
{
if (dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) {
pr_info("%s only 64bit DMA supported on CXL", __func__);
return -EIO;
}
*(pdev->dev.dma_mask) = dma_mask;
return 0;
}
static int cxl_pci_probe_mode(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
return PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
......@@ -220,7 +209,6 @@ static struct pci_controller_ops cxl_pci_controller_ops =
.reset_secondary_bus = cxl_pci_reset_secondary_bus,
.setup_msi_irqs = cxl_setup_msi_irqs,
.teardown_msi_irqs = cxl_teardown_msi_irqs,
.dma_set_mask = cxl_dma_set_mask,
};
int cxl_pci_vphb_add(struct cxl_afu *afu)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册