mac80211: extend protection against mixed key and fragment cache attacks

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.42
commit 6abcc01e8b3b804a7f18721666d978f39470e30c
bugzilla: 55093
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

commit 3edc6b0d upstream.

For some chips/drivers, e.g., QCA6174 with ath10k, the decryption is
done by the hardware, and the Protected bit in the Frame Control field
is cleared in the lower level driver before the frame is passed to
mac80211. In such cases, the condition for ieee80211_has_protected() is
not met in ieee80211_rx_h_defragment() of mac80211 and the new security
validation steps are not executed.

Extend mac80211 to cover the case where the Protected bit has been
cleared, but the frame is indicated as having been decrypted by the
hardware. This extends protection against mixed key and fragment cache
attack for additional drivers/chips. This fixes CVE-2020-24586 and
CVE-2020-24587 for such cases.

Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00110-QCARMSWP-1

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NWen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NJouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210511200110.037aa5ca0390.I7bb888e2965a0db02a67075fcb5deb50eb7408aa@changeidSigned-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

net/mac80211/rx.c

@@ -2239,6 +2239,7 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
 	unsigned int frag, seq;
 	struct ieee80211_fragment_entry *entry;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct ieee80211_rx_status *status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(rx->skb);
 
 	hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)rx->skb->data;
 	fc = hdr->frame_control;
@@ -2297,7 +2298,9 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
 				     sizeof(rx->key->u.gcmp.rx_pn[queue]));
 			BUILD_BUG_ON(IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN !=
 				     IEEE80211_GCMP_PN_LEN);
-		} else if (rx->key && ieee80211_has_protected(fc)) {
+		} else if (rx->key &&
+			   (ieee80211_has_protected(fc) ||
+			    (status->flag & RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED))) {
 			entry->is_protected = true;
 			entry->key_color = rx->key->color;
 		}
@@ -2342,13 +2345,19 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
 			return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
 		memcpy(entry->last_pn, pn, IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN);
 	} else if (entry->is_protected &&
-		   (!rx->key || !ieee80211_has_protected(fc) ||
+		   (!rx->key ||
+		    (!ieee80211_has_protected(fc) &&
+		     !(status->flag & RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED)) ||
 		    rx->key->color != entry->key_color)) {
 		/* Drop this as a mixed key or fragment cache attack, even
 		 * if for TKIP Michael MIC should protect us, and WEP is a
 		 * lost cause anyway.
 		 */
 		return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
+	} else if (entry->is_protected && rx->key &&
+		   entry->key_color != rx->key->color &&
+		   (status->flag & RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED)) {
+		return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
 	}
 
 	skb_pull(rx->skb, ieee80211_hdrlen(fc));