bpf: Fix unsigned 'datasec_id' compared with zero in check_pseudo_btf_id

The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call
to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code.

This fixes the following coccicheck warning:

  ./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0

Fixes: eaa6bcb7 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Reported-by: NTosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: NKaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1605071026-25906-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

@@ -9572,12 +9572,13 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			       struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			       struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux)
 {
-	u32 datasec_id, type, id = insn->imm;
 	const struct btf_var_secinfo *vsi;
 	const struct btf_type *datasec;
 	const struct btf_type *t;
 	const char *sym_name;
 	bool percpu = false;
+	u32 type, id = insn->imm;
+	s32 datasec_id;
 	u64 addr;
 	int i;