efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName
It's not wise to assume VariableNameSize represents the length of VariableName, as not all firmware updates VariableNameSize in the same way (some don't update it at all if EFI_SUCCESS is returned). There are even implementations out there that update VariableNameSize with values that are both larger than the string returned in VariableName and smaller than the buffer passed to GetNextVariableName(), which resulted in the following bug report from Michael Schroeder, > On HP z220 system (firmware version 1.54), some EFI variables are > incorrectly named : > > ls -d /sys/firmware/efi/vars/*8be4d* | grep -v -- -8be returns > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/dbxDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/KEKDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SecureBoot-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SetupMode-Information8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c The issue here is that because we blindly use VariableNameSize without verifying its value, we can potentially read garbage values from the buffer containing VariableName if VariableNameSize is larger than the length of VariableName. Since VariableName is a string, we can calculate its size by searching for the terminating NULL character. Reported-by: NFrederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Schroeder <mls@suse.com> Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> Cc: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录