提交 ebff7d8f 编写于 作者: Y Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mem hotunplug: fix kfree() of bootmem memory

When hot removing memory presented at boot time, following messages are shown:

  kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3409!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
  Modules linked in: ebtable_nat ebtables xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle bridge stp llc ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler sunrpc ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables binfmt_misc vfat fat dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod vhost_net macvtap macvlan tun uinput iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode pcspkr sg i2c_i801 lpc_ich mfd_core igb i2c_algo_bit i2c_core e1000e ptp pps_core tpm_infineon ioatdma dca sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif usb_storage megaraid_sas lpfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt scsi_mod
  CPU 0
  Pid: 5091, comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G        W    3.9.0-rc6+ #15
  RIP: kfree+0x232/0x240
  Process kworker/0:2 (pid: 5091, threadinfo ffff88084678c000, task ffff88083928ca80)
  Call Trace:
    __release_region+0xd4/0xe0
    __remove_pages+0x52/0x110
    arch_remove_memory+0x89/0xd0
    remove_memory+0xc4/0x100
    acpi_memory_device_remove+0x6d/0xb1
    acpi_device_remove+0x89/0xab
    __device_release_driver+0x7c/0xf0
    device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
    acpi_bus_device_detach+0x6c/0x70
    acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x11a/0x250
    acpi_walk_namespace+0xee/0x137
    acpi_bus_trim+0x33/0x7a
    acpi_bus_hot_remove_device+0xc4/0x1a1
    acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34
    process_one_work+0x1f7/0x590
    worker_thread+0x11a/0x370
    kthread+0xee/0x100
    ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  RIP  [<ffffffff811c41d2>] kfree+0x232/0x240
   RSP <ffff88084678d968>

The reason why the messages are shown is to release a resource
structure, allocated by bootmem, by kfree().  So when we release a
resource structure, we should check whether it is allocated by bootmem
or not.

But even if we know a resource structure is allocated by bootmem, we
cannot release it since SLxB cannot treat it.  So for reusing a resource
structure, this patch remembers it by using bootmem_resource as follows:

When releasing a resource structure by free_resource(), free_resource()
checks whether the resource structure is allocated by bootmem or not.
If it is allocated by bootmem, free_resource() adds it to
bootmem_resource.  If it is not allocated by bootmem, free_resource()
release it by kfree().

And when getting a new resource structure by get_resource(),
get_resource() checks whether bootmem_resource has released resource
structures or not.  If there is a released resource structure,
get_resource() returns it.  If there is not a releaed resource
structure, get_resource() returns new resource structure allocated by
kzalloc().

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/get_resource/alloc_resource/]
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 9ca24e2e
......@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/pfn.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
......@@ -50,6 +51,14 @@ struct resource_constraint {
static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock);
/*
* For memory hotplug, there is no way to free resource entries allocated
* by boot mem after the system is up. So for reusing the resource entry
* we need to remember the resource.
*/
static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bootmem_resource_lock);
static void *r_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct resource *p = v;
......@@ -151,6 +160,40 @@ __initcall(ioresources_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
static void free_resource(struct resource *res)
{
if (!res)
return;
if (!PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res))) {
spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
res->sibling = bootmem_resource_free;
bootmem_resource_free = res;
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
} else {
kfree(res);
}
}
static struct resource *alloc_resource(gfp_t flags)
{
struct resource *res = NULL;
spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (bootmem_resource_free) {
res = bootmem_resource_free;
bootmem_resource_free = res->sibling;
}
spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
if (res)
memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
else
res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
return res;
}
/* Return the conflict entry if you can't request it */
static struct resource * __request_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new)
{
......@@ -771,7 +814,7 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
{
struct resource *parent = root;
struct resource *conflict;
struct resource *res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_ATOMIC);
struct resource *res = alloc_resource(GFP_ATOMIC);
struct resource *next_res = NULL;
if (!res)
......@@ -796,7 +839,7 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
/* conflict covered whole area */
if (conflict->start <= res->start &&
conflict->end >= res->end) {
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
WARN_ON(next_res);
break;
}
......@@ -806,10 +849,9 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
end = res->end;
res->end = conflict->start - 1;
if (conflict->end < end) {
next_res = kzalloc(sizeof(*next_res),
GFP_ATOMIC);
next_res = alloc_resource(GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!next_res) {
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
break;
}
next_res->name = name;
......@@ -899,7 +941,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
const char *name, int flags)
{
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
struct resource *res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
struct resource *res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!res)
return NULL;
......@@ -933,7 +975,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
continue;
}
/* Uhhuh, that didn't work out.. */
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
res = NULL;
break;
}
......@@ -967,7 +1009,7 @@ int __check_region(struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
return -EBUSY;
release_resource(res);
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__check_region);
......@@ -1007,7 +1049,7 @@ void __release_region(struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
write_unlock(&resource_lock);
if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MUXED)
wake_up(&muxed_resource_wait);
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
return;
}
p = &res->sibling;
......@@ -1055,8 +1097,8 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
if ((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end))
return ret;
/* The kzalloc() result gets checked later */
new_res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
/* The alloc_resource() result gets checked later */
new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
p = &parent->child;
write_lock(&resource_lock);
......@@ -1083,7 +1125,7 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
if (res->start == start && res->end == end) {
/* free the whole entry */
*p = res->sibling;
kfree(res);
free_resource(res);
ret = 0;
} else if (res->start == start && res->end != end) {
/* adjust the start */
......@@ -1119,7 +1161,7 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
}
write_unlock(&resource_lock);
kfree(new_res);
free_resource(new_res);
return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册