sctp: fail if no bound addresses can be used for a given scope
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.165 commit 6ef652f35dcfaa1ab2b2cf6c1694718595148eee category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6I7U3 CVE: CVE-2023-1074 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=6ef652f35dcfaa1ab2b2cf6c1694718595148eee -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 458e279f ] Currently, if you bind the socket to something like: servaddr.sin6_family = AF_INET6; servaddr.sin6_port = htons(0); servaddr.sin6_scope_id = 0; inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::1", &servaddr.sin6_addr); And then request a connect to: connaddr.sin6_family = AF_INET6; connaddr.sin6_port = htons(20000); connaddr.sin6_scope_id = if_nametoindex("lo"); inet_pton(AF_INET6, "fe88::1", &connaddr.sin6_addr); What the stack does is: - bind the socket - create a new asoc - to handle the connect - copy the addresses that can be used for the given scope - try to connect But the copy returns 0 addresses, and the effect is that it ends up trying to connect as if the socket wasn't bound, which is not the desired behavior. This unexpected behavior also allows KASLR leaks through SCTP diag interface. The fix here then is, if when trying to copy the addresses that can be used for the scope used in connect() it returns 0 addresses, bail out. This is what TCP does with a similar reproducer. Reported-by: NPietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it> Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9fcd182f1099f86c6661f3717f63712ddd1c676c.1674496737.git.marcelo.leitner@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NYue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWang Weiyang <wangweiyang2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录