selftests/bpf: add "any alignment" annotation for some tests

RISC-V does, in-general, not have "efficient unaligned access". When
testing the RISC-V BPF JIT, some selftests failed in the verification
due to misaligned access. Annotate these tests with the
F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS flag.
Signed-off-by: NBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c

@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@
 	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid read past end of SK_MSG",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c

@@ -687,6 +687,7 @@
 	},
 	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 	.result = REJECT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 3",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset32: BPF_X",
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset32: min/max deduction",
@@ -93,6 +95,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { -1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jeq32: BPF_X",
@@ -119,6 +122,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jeq32: min/max deduction",
@@ -154,6 +158,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { -1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jne32: BPF_X",
@@ -180,6 +185,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jne32: min/max deduction",
@@ -218,6 +224,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 0, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jge32: BPF_X",
@@ -244,6 +251,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { (UINT_MAX - 1) | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jge32: min/max deduction",
@@ -284,6 +292,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 0, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: BPF_X",
@@ -310,6 +319,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { (UINT_MAX - 1) | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: min/max deduction",
@@ -350,6 +360,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { INT_MAX, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jle32: BPF_X",
@@ -376,6 +387,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { UINT_MAX, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jle32: min/max deduction",
@@ -416,6 +428,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { INT_MAX - 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jlt32: BPF_X",
@@ -442,6 +455,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { (INT_MAX - 1) | 3ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jlt32: min/max deduction",
@@ -482,6 +496,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { -2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsge32: BPF_X",
@@ -508,6 +523,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { -2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsge32: min/max deduction",
@@ -548,6 +564,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsgt32: BPF_X",
@@ -574,6 +591,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsgt32: min/max deduction",
@@ -614,6 +632,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsle32: BPF_X",
@@ -640,6 +659,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsle32: min/max deduction",
@@ -680,6 +700,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jslt32: BPF_X",
@@ -706,6 +727,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jslt32: min/max deduction",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c

@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
 		  .data64 = { ~0ULL, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset: sign-extend",
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
 	.data = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, },
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset: known const compare",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 	.errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled",
 	.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv",
 	.result = REJECT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"check corrupted spill/fill, LSB",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c

@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"spin_lock: test4 direct ld/st",
@@ -112,6 +113,7 @@
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"spin_lock: test5 call within a locked region",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c

@@ -512,6 +512,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 3",
@@ -537,6 +538,7 @@
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 4",
@@ -559,6 +561,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "R1 max value is outside of the array range",
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 1",
@@ -598,6 +601,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 3",