提交 e1cd8f78 编写于 作者: I Ilpo Jrvinen 提交者: David S. Miller

[TCP] FRTO: Clear frto_highmark only after process_frto that uses it

I broke this in commit 3de96471:

	[TCP]: Wrap-safed reordering detection FRTO check

tcp_process_frto should always see a valid frto_highmark. An invalid
frto_highmark (zero) is very likely what ultimately caused a seqno
compare in tcp_frto_enter_loss to do the wrong leading to the LOST-bit
leak.

Having LOST-bits integry ensured like done after commit
23aeeec3:

	[TCP] FRTO: Plug potential LOST-bit leak

won't hurt. It may still be useful in some other, possibly legimate,
scenario.

Reported by Chazarain Guillaume <guichaz@yahoo.fr>.
Signed-off-by: NIlpo Jrvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 c67625a1
......@@ -3113,11 +3113,11 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
/* See if we can take anything off of the retransmit queue. */
flag |= tcp_clean_rtx_queue(sk, &seq_rtt, prior_fackets);
if (tp->frto_counter)
frto_cwnd = tcp_process_frto(sk, flag);
/* Guarantee sacktag reordering detection against wrap-arounds */
if (before(tp->frto_highmark, tp->snd_una))
tp->frto_highmark = 0;
if (tp->frto_counter)
frto_cwnd = tcp_process_frto(sk, flag);
if (tcp_ack_is_dubious(sk, flag)) {
/* Advance CWND, if state allows this. */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册