提交 e0051d7d 编写于 作者: P Peter Zijlstra 提交者: Jens Axboe

io-wq: Fix io_wq_worker_affinity()

Do not include private headers and do not frob in internals.

On top of that, while the previous code restores the affinity, it
doesn't ensure the task actually moves there if it was running,
leading to the fun situation that it can be observed running outside
of its allowed mask for potentially significant time.

Use the proper API instead.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YG7QkiUzlEbW85TU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
上级 cb3b200e
......@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
#include "../kernel/sched/sched.h"
#include "io-wq.h"
#define WORKER_IDLE_TIMEOUT (5 * HZ)
......@@ -1064,14 +1063,8 @@ void io_wq_put_and_exit(struct io_wq *wq)
static bool io_wq_worker_affinity(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
{
struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
struct rq_flags rf;
struct rq *rq;
rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
do_set_cpus_allowed(task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
return false;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册