提交 dc9ddd98 编写于 作者: E Eric Sandeen 提交者: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove unused ac_ex_scanned

When looking at a bug report with:

> kernel: EXT4-fs: 0 scanned, 0 found

I thought wow, 0 scanned, that's odd?  But it's not odd; it's printing
a variable that is initialized to 0 and never touched again.

It's never been used since the original merge, so I don't really even
know what the original intent was, either.

If anyone knows how to hook it up, speak now via patch, otherwise just
yank it so it's not making a confusing situation more confusing in
kernel logs.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 e861b5e9
......@@ -4008,8 +4008,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_show_ac(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
(unsigned long)ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len,
(unsigned long)ac->ac_b_ex.fe_logical,
(int)ac->ac_criteria);
ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR, "%lu scanned, %d found",
ac->ac_ex_scanned, ac->ac_found);
ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR, "%d found", ac->ac_found);
ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR, "groups: ");
ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
......
......@@ -175,8 +175,6 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context {
/* copy of the best found extent taken before preallocation efforts */
struct ext4_free_extent ac_f_ex;
/* number of iterations done. we have to track to limit searching */
unsigned long ac_ex_scanned;
__u16 ac_groups_scanned;
__u16 ac_found;
__u16 ac_tail;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册