提交 dba7d9b8 编写于 作者: E Eric Dumazet 提交者: David S. Miller

tcp: annotate tp->rcv_nxt lockless reads

There are few places where we fetch tp->rcv_nxt while
this field can change from IRQ or other cpu.

We need to add READ_ONCE() annotations, and also make
sure write sides use corresponding WRITE_ONCE() to avoid
store-tearing.

Note that tcp_inq_hint() was already using READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt)

syzbot reported :

BUG: KCSAN: data-race in tcp_poll / tcp_queue_rcv

write to 0xffff888120425770 of 4 bytes by interrupt on cpu 0:
 tcp_rcv_nxt_update net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3365 [inline]
 tcp_queue_rcv+0x180/0x380 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:4638
 tcp_rcv_established+0xbf1/0xf50 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5616
 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x381/0x4e0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1542
 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1a03/0x1bf0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1923
 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x51/0x470 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:204
 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x110/0x140 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:231
 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline]
 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:299 [inline]
 ip_local_deliver+0x133/0x210 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:252
 dst_input include/net/dst.h:442 [inline]
 ip_rcv_finish+0x121/0x160 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:413
 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline]
 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:299 [inline]
 ip_rcv+0x18f/0x1a0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:523
 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xa7/0xe0 net/core/dev.c:5004
 __netif_receive_skb+0x37/0xf0 net/core/dev.c:5118
 netif_receive_skb_internal+0x59/0x190 net/core/dev.c:5208
 napi_skb_finish net/core/dev.c:5671 [inline]
 napi_gro_receive+0x28f/0x330 net/core/dev.c:5704
 receive_buf+0x284/0x30b0 drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1061

read to 0xffff888120425770 of 4 bytes by task 7254 on cpu 1:
 tcp_stream_is_readable net/ipv4/tcp.c:480 [inline]
 tcp_poll+0x204/0x6b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:554
 sock_poll+0xed/0x250 net/socket.c:1256
 vfs_poll include/linux/poll.h:90 [inline]
 ep_item_poll.isra.0+0x90/0x190 fs/eventpoll.c:892
 ep_send_events_proc+0x113/0x5c0 fs/eventpoll.c:1749
 ep_scan_ready_list.constprop.0+0x189/0x500 fs/eventpoll.c:704
 ep_send_events fs/eventpoll.c:1793 [inline]
 ep_poll+0xe3/0x900 fs/eventpoll.c:1930
 do_epoll_wait+0x162/0x180 fs/eventpoll.c:2294
 __do_sys_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2325 [inline]
 __se_sys_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2311 [inline]
 __x64_sys_epoll_pwait+0xcd/0x170 fs/eventpoll.c:2311
 do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x2f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 1 PID: 7254 Comm: syz-fuzzer Not tainted 5.3.0+ #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Nsyzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 d983ea6f
......@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static void tcp_tx_timestamp(struct sock *sk, u16 tsflags)
static inline bool tcp_stream_is_readable(const struct tcp_sock *tp,
int target, struct sock *sk)
{
return (tp->rcv_nxt - tp->copied_seq >= target) ||
return (READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) - tp->copied_seq >= target) ||
(sk->sk_prot->stream_memory_read ?
sk->sk_prot->stream_memory_read(sk) : false);
}
......@@ -2935,7 +2935,7 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_SEND_QUEUE)
tp->write_seq = val;
else if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE)
tp->rcv_nxt = val;
WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, val);
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
......
......@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void tcp_diag_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct inet_diag_msg *r,
} else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM) {
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
r->idiag_rqueue = max_t(int, tp->rcv_nxt - tp->copied_seq, 0);
r->idiag_rqueue = max_t(int, READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) - tp->copied_seq, 0);
r->idiag_wqueue = tp->write_seq - tp->snd_una;
}
if (info)
......
......@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ static void tcp_rcv_nxt_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 seq)
sock_owned_by_me((struct sock *)tp);
tp->bytes_received += delta;
tp->rcv_nxt = seq;
WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, seq);
}
/* Update our send window.
......@@ -5932,7 +5932,7 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Ok.. it's good. Set up sequence numbers and
* move to established.
*/
tp->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1);
tp->rcv_wup = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
/* RFC1323: The window in SYN & SYN/ACK segments is
......@@ -6035,7 +6035,7 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
tp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr);
}
tp->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
WRITE_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1);
tp->copied_seq = tp->rcv_nxt;
tp->rcv_wup = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
......
......@@ -2455,7 +2455,8 @@ static void get_tcp4_sock(struct sock *sk, struct seq_file *f, int i)
/* Because we don't lock the socket,
* we might find a transient negative value.
*/
rx_queue = max_t(int, tp->rcv_nxt - tp->copied_seq, 0);
rx_queue = max_t(int, READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) -
tp->copied_seq, 0);
seq_printf(f, "%4d: %08X:%04X %08X:%04X %02X %08X:%08X %02X:%08lX "
"%08X %5u %8d %lu %d %pK %lu %lu %u %u %d",
......
......@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(const struct sock *sk,
struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk;
struct tcp_sock *oldtp, *newtp;
u32 seq;
if (!newsk)
return NULL;
......@@ -475,8 +476,10 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(const struct sock *sk,
/* Now setup tcp_sock */
newtp->pred_flags = 0;
newtp->rcv_wup = newtp->copied_seq =
newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
seq = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
newtp->rcv_wup = seq;
newtp->copied_seq = seq;
WRITE_ONCE(newtp->rcv_nxt, seq);
newtp->segs_in = 1;
newtp->snd_sml = newtp->snd_una =
......
......@@ -1895,7 +1895,8 @@ static void get_tcp6_sock(struct seq_file *seq, struct sock *sp, int i)
/* Because we don't lock the socket,
* we might find a transient negative value.
*/
rx_queue = max_t(int, tp->rcv_nxt - tp->copied_seq, 0);
rx_queue = max_t(int, READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) -
tp->copied_seq, 0);
seq_printf(seq,
"%4d: %08X%08X%08X%08X:%04X %08X%08X%08X%08X:%04X "
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册