netfilter: nf_tables: do not allow CHAIN_ID to refer to another table

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.137
commit 9e7dcb88ec8e85e4a8ad0ea494ea2f90f32d2583
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 187457, https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5MEZD
CVE: CVE-2022-2586

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=9e7dcb88ec8e85e4a8ad0ea494ea2f90f32d2583

--------------------------------

commit 95f466d2 upstream.

When doing lookups for chains on the same batch by using its ID, a chain
from a different table can be used. If a rule is added to a table but
refers to a chain in a different table, it will be linked to the chain in
table2, but would have expressions referring to objects in table1.

Then, when table1 is removed, the rule will not be removed as its linked to
a chain in table2. When expressions in the rule are processed or removed,
that will lead to a use-after-free.

When looking for chains by ID, use the table that was used for the lookup
by name, and only return chains belonging to that same table.

Fixes: 837830a4 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID attribute")
Signed-off-by: NThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NXiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c

@@ -2265,6 +2265,7 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
 }
 
 static struct nft_chain *nft_chain_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
+					       const struct nft_table *table,
 					       const struct nlattr *nla)
 {
 	u32 id = ntohl(nla_get_be32(nla));
@@ -2274,6 +2275,7 @@ static struct nft_chain *nft_chain_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
 		struct nft_chain *chain = trans->ctx.chain;
 
 		if (trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN &&
+		    chain->table == table &&
 		    id == nft_trans_chain_id(trans))
 			return chain;
 	}
@@ -3199,7 +3201,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	} else if (nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID]) {
-		chain = nft_chain_lookup_byid(net, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID]);
+		chain = nft_chain_lookup_byid(net, table, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID]);
 		if (IS_ERR(chain)) {
 			NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID]);
 			return PTR_ERR(chain);
@@ -8641,7 +8643,7 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data,
 						 tb[NFTA_VERDICT_CHAIN],
 						 genmask);
 		} else if (tb[NFTA_VERDICT_CHAIN_ID]) {
-			chain = nft_chain_lookup_byid(ctx->net,
+			chain = nft_chain_lookup_byid(ctx->net, ctx->table,
 						      tb[NFTA_VERDICT_CHAIN_ID]);
 			if (IS_ERR(chain))
 				return PTR_ERR(chain);