提交 d9f85963 编写于 作者: F Filipe Manana 提交者: Chris Mason

Btrfs: fix corruption after write/fsync failure + fsync + log recovery

While writing to a file, in inode.c:cow_file_range() (and same applies to
submit_compressed_extents()), after reserving an extent for the file data,
we create a new extent map for the written range and insert it into the
extent map cache. After that, we create an ordered operation, but if it
fails (due to a transient/temporary-ENOMEM), we return without dropping
that extent map, which points to a reserved extent that is freed when we
return. A subsequent incremental fsync (when the btrfs inode doesn't have
the flag BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC) considers this extent map valid and
logs a file extent item based on that extent map, which points to a disk
extent that doesn't contain valid data - it was freed by us earlier, at this
point it might contain any random/garbage data.

Therefore, if we reach an error condition when cowing a file range after
we added the new extent map to the cache, drop it from the cache before
returning.

Some sequence of steps that lead to this:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount -o commit=9999 /dev/sdd /mnt
    $ cd /mnt

    $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 4096 0 4096" -c "fsync" foo
    $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 4096 4096 4096"
    $ sync

    $ od -t x1 foo
    0000000 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
    *
    0010000 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
    *
    0020000

    $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 4096 0 4096" foo

    # Now this write + fsync fail with -ENOMEM, which was returned by
    # btrfs_add_ordered_extent() in inode.c:cow_file_range().
    $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 4096 4096 4096" foo
    $ xfs_io -c "fsync" foo
    fsync: Cannot allocate memory

    # Now do a new write + fsync, which will succeed. Our previous
    # -ENOMEM was a transient/temporary error.
    $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xee -b 4096 16384 4096" foo
    $ xfs_io -c "fsync" foo

    # Our file content (in page cache) is now:
    $ od -t x1 foo
    0000000 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1
    *
    0010000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
    *
    0020000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    *
    0040000 ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
    *
    0050000

    # Now reboot the machine, and mount the fs, so that fsync log replay
    # takes place.

    # The file content is now weird, in particular the first 8Kb, which
    # do not match our data before nor after the sync command above.
    $ od -t x1 foo
    0000000 ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
    *
    0010000 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
    *
    0020000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    *
    0040000 ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
    *
    0050000

    # In fact these first 4Kb are a duplicate of the last 4kb block.
    # The last write got an extent map/file extent item that points to
    # the same disk extent that we got in the write+fsync that failed
    # with the -ENOMEM error. btrfs-debug-tree and btrfsck allow us to
    # verify that:

    $ btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdd
    (...)
	item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15819 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12582912 nr 8192
		extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 8192
	item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15766 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 0 nr 0
		extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 8192
	item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 16384) itemoff 15713 itemsize 53
		extent data disk byte 12582912 nr 4096
		extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096

    $ umount /dev/sdd
    $ btrfsck /dev/sdd
    Checking filesystem on /dev/sdd
    UUID: db5e60e1-050d-41e6-8c7f-3d742dea5d8f
    checking extents
    extent item 12582912 has multiple extent items
    ref mismatch on [12582912 4096] extent item 1, found 2
    Backref bytes do not match extent backref, bytenr=12582912, ref bytes=4096, backref bytes=8192
    backpointer mismatch on [12582912 4096]
    Errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
    checking free space cache
    checking fs roots
    root 5 inode 257 errors 1000, some csum missing
    found 131074 bytes used err is 1
    total csum bytes: 4
    total tree bytes: 131072
    total fs tree bytes: 32768
    total extent tree bytes: 16384
    btree space waste bytes: 123404
    file data blocks allocated: 274432
     referenced 274432
    Btrfs v3.14.1-96-gcc7fd5a-dirty
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
上级 e9512d72
......@@ -778,8 +778,12 @@ static noinline int submit_compressed_extents(struct inode *inode,
ins.offset,
BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED,
async_extent->compress_type);
if (ret)
if (ret) {
btrfs_drop_extent_cache(inode, async_extent->start,
async_extent->start +
async_extent->ram_size - 1, 0);
goto out_free_reserve;
}
/*
* clear dirty, set writeback and unlock the pages.
......@@ -971,14 +975,14 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode,
ret = btrfs_add_ordered_extent(inode, start, ins.objectid,
ram_size, cur_alloc_size, 0);
if (ret)
goto out_reserve;
goto out_drop_extent_cache;
if (root->root_key.objectid ==
BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) {
ret = btrfs_reloc_clone_csums(inode, start,
cur_alloc_size);
if (ret)
goto out_reserve;
goto out_drop_extent_cache;
}
if (disk_num_bytes < cur_alloc_size)
......@@ -1006,6 +1010,8 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode,
out:
return ret;
out_drop_extent_cache:
btrfs_drop_extent_cache(inode, start, start + ram_size - 1, 0);
out_reserve:
btrfs_free_reserved_extent(root, ins.objectid, ins.offset, 1);
out_unlock:
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册