提交 d8fe29e9 编写于 作者: J Josef Bacik 提交者: Chris Mason

Btrfs: don't drop path when printing out tree errors in scrub

A user reported a panic where we were panicing somewhere in
tree_backref_for_extent from scrub_print_warning.  He only captured the trace
but looking at scrub_print_warning we drop the path right before we mess with
the extent buffer to print out a bunch of stuff, which isn't right.  So fix this
by dropping the path after we use the eb if we need to.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
上级 82d130ff
...@@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock) ...@@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock)
eb = path->nodes[0]; eb = path->nodes[0];
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_extent_item); ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_extent_item);
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, path->slots[0]); item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, path->slots[0]);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) { if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) {
do { do {
...@@ -558,7 +557,9 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock) ...@@ -558,7 +557,9 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock)
ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_level, ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_level,
ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_root); ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_root);
} while (ret != 1); } while (ret != 1);
btrfs_release_path(path);
} else { } else {
btrfs_release_path(path);
swarn.path = path; swarn.path = path;
swarn.dev = dev; swarn.dev = dev;
iterate_extent_inodes(fs_info, found_key.objectid, iterate_extent_inodes(fs_info, found_key.objectid,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册