提交 d8289d3a 编写于 作者: W Will Deacon 提交者: Catalin Marinas

arm64: tlb: Justify non-leaf invalidation in flush_tlb_range()

Add a comment to explain why we can't get away with last-level
invalidation in flush_tlb_range()
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
上级 0795edaf
...@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, ...@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end) unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{ {
/*
* We cannot use leaf-only invalidation here, since we may be invalidating
* table entries as part of collapsing hugepages or moving page tables.
*/
__flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, false); __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, false);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册