提交 d2c46855 编写于 作者: A Artem Bityutskiy

UBI: improve comment

Explain better the purpose of thie 'move_to_put' stuff.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
上级 d19bafd9
......@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk,
e1 = rb_entry(rb_first(&ubi->scrub), struct ubi_wl_entry, rb);
e2 = find_wl_entry(&ubi->free, WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF);
paranoid_check_in_wl_tree(e1, &ubi->scrub);
rb_erase(&e1->rb, &ubi->scrub);
rb_erase(&e1->rb, &ubi->scrub);
dbg_wl("scrub PEB %d to PEB %d", e1->pnum, e2->pnum);
}
......@@ -1139,8 +1139,11 @@ int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
/*
* User is putting the physical eraseblock which was selected
* as the target the data is moved to. It may happen if the EBA
* unit already re-mapped the LEB but the WL unit did has not
* put the PEB to the "used" tree.
* unit already re-mapped the LEB in 'ubi_eba_copy_leb()' but
* the WL unit has not put the PEB to the "used" tree yet, but
* it is about to do this. So we just set a flag which will
* tell the WL worker that the PEB is not needed anymore and
* should be sheduled for erasure.
*/
dbg_wl("PEB %d is the target of data moving", pnum);
ubi_assert(!ubi->move_to_put);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册