ipv6: weaken the v4mapped source check

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.27
commit 5f64c4c550c88d2994693117b1d3eb100783b350
bugzilla: 51493

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit dcc32f4f ]

This reverts commit 6af1799a.

Commit 6af1799a ("ipv6: drop incoming packets having a v4mapped
source address") introduced an input check against v4mapped addresses.
Use of such addresses on the wire is indeed questionable and not
allowed on public Internet. As the commit pointed out

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02

lists potential issues.

Unfortunately there are applications which use v4mapped addresses,
and breaking them is a clear regression. For example v4mapped
addresses (or any semi-valid addresses, really) may be used
for uni-direction event streams or packet export.

Since the issue which sparked the addition of the check was with
TCP and request_socks in particular push the check down to TCPv6
and DCCP. This restores the ability to receive UDPv6 packets with
v4mapped address as the source.

Keep using the IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS statistic to minimize the
user-visible changes.

Fixes: 6af1799a ("ipv6: drop incoming packets having a v4mapped source address")
Reported-by: NSunyi Shao <sunyishao@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: N  Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

net/dccp/ipv6.c

@@ -319,6 +319,11 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!ipv6_unicast_destination(skb))
 		return 0;	/* discard, don't send a reset here */
 
+	if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr)) {
+		__IP6_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), NULL, IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	if (dccp_bad_service_code(sk, service)) {
 		dcb->dccpd_reset_code = DCCP_RESET_CODE_BAD_SERVICE_CODE;
 		goto drop;

net/ipv6/ip6_input.c

@@ -245,16 +245,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *ip6_rcv_core(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&hdr->saddr))
 		goto err;
 
-	/* While RFC4291 is not explicit about v4mapped addresses
-	 * in IPv6 headers, it seems clear linux dual-stack
-	 * model can not deal properly with these.
-	 * Security models could be fooled by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 for example.
-	 *
-	 * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02
-	 */
-	if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&hdr->saddr))
-		goto err;
-
 	skb->transport_header = skb->network_header + sizeof(*hdr);
 	IP6CB(skb)->nhoff = offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, nexthdr);
 

net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c

@@ -1170,6 +1170,11 @@ static int tcp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!ipv6_unicast_destination(skb))
 		goto drop;
 
+	if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr)) {
+		__IP6_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), NULL, IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	return tcp_conn_request(&tcp6_request_sock_ops,
 				&tcp_request_sock_ipv6_ops, sk, skb);
 

net/mptcp/subflow.c

@@ -398,6 +398,11 @@ static int subflow_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!ipv6_unicast_destination(skb))
 		goto drop;
 
+	if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr)) {
+		__IP6_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), NULL, IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	return tcp_conn_request(&mptcp_subflow_request_sock_ops,
 				&subflow_request_sock_ipv6_ops, sk, skb);