提交 c9877b20 编写于 作者: E Eric Sandeen 提交者: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix for fiemap last-block test

Carl Henrik Lunde reported and debugged this; the test for the
last allocated block was comparing bytes to blocks in this test:

	if (logical + length - 1 == EXT_MAX_BLOCK ||
	    ext4_ext_next_allocated_block(path) == EXT_MAX_BLOCK)
		flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;

so any extent which ended right at 4G was stopping the extent
walk.  Just replacing these values with the extent block &
length should fix it.

Also give blksize_bits a saner type, and reverse the order 
of the tests to make the more likely case tested first.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NCarl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@ping.uio.no>
Tested-by: NCarl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@ping.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 19ba0559
......@@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_fiemap_cb(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_ext_path *path,
void *data)
{
struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo = data;
unsigned long blksize_bits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
unsigned char blksize_bits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
__u64 logical;
__u64 physical;
__u64 length;
......@@ -3243,8 +3243,8 @@ static int ext4_ext_fiemap_cb(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_ext_path *path,
*
* XXX this might miss a single-block extent at EXT_MAX_BLOCK
*/
if (logical + length - 1 == EXT_MAX_BLOCK ||
ext4_ext_next_allocated_block(path) == EXT_MAX_BLOCK)
if (ext4_ext_next_allocated_block(path) == EXT_MAX_BLOCK ||
newex->ec_block + newex->ec_len - 1 == EXT_MAX_BLOCK)
flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST;
error = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, logical, physical,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册