提交 c9322458 编写于 作者: A Arnd Bergmann 提交者: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: bridge: avoid unused label warning

With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
disabled, which leads to a harmless gcc warning:

net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c: In function 'br_nf_dev_queue_xmit':
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:792:2: warning: label 'drop' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]

This gets rid of the warning by cleaning up the code to avoid
the respective #ifdefs causing this problem, and replacing them
with if(IS_ENABLED()) checks. I have verified that the resulting
object code is unchanged, and an additional advantage is that
we now get compile coverage of the unused functions in more
configurations.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: dd302b59 ("netfilter: bridge: don't leak skb in error paths")
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
上级 d53195c2
......@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ static inline __be16 pppoe_proto(const struct sk_buff *skb)
/* largest possible L2 header, see br_nf_dev_queue_xmit() */
#define NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH (PPPOE_SES_HLEN + ETH_HLEN)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6)
struct brnf_frag_data {
char mac[NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH];
u8 encap_size;
......@@ -121,7 +120,6 @@ struct brnf_frag_data {
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct brnf_frag_data, brnf_frag_data_storage);
#endif
static void nf_bridge_info_free(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
......@@ -666,7 +664,6 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_arp(void *priv,
return NF_STOLEN;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6)
static int br_nf_push_frag_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
......@@ -696,9 +693,7 @@ static int br_nf_push_frag_xmit_sk(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct net *net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
return br_nf_push_frag_xmit(net, sk, skb);
}
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4)
static int
br_nf_ip_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
int (*output)(struct sock *, struct sk_buff *))
......@@ -716,7 +711,6 @@ br_nf_ip_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return ip_do_fragment(sk, skb, output);
}
#endif
static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
......@@ -739,11 +733,11 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4)
/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
* boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
*/
if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4) &&
skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
if (br_validate_ipv4(net, skb))
......@@ -765,9 +759,8 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
return br_nf_ip_fragment(net, sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit_sk);
}
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6)
if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6) &&
skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
const struct nf_ipv6_ops *v6ops = nf_get_ipv6_ops();
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
......@@ -791,7 +784,6 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
kfree_skb(skb);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
#endif
nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
drop:
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册