提交 c8c05a8e 编写于 作者: C Catherine Zhang 提交者: David S. Miller

[LSM-IPsec]: SELinux Authorize

This patch contains a fix for the previous patch that adds security
contexts to IPsec policies and security associations.  In the previous
patch, no authorization (besides the check for write permissions to
SAD and SPD) is required to delete IPsec policies and security
assocations with security contexts.  Thus a user authorized to change
SAD and SPD can bypass the IPsec policy authorization by simply
deleteing policies with security contexts.  To fix this security hole,
an additional authorization check is added for removing security
policies and security associations with security contexts.

Note that if no security context is supplied on add or present on
policy to be deleted, the SELinux module allows the change
unconditionally.  The hook is called on deletion when no context is
present, which we may want to change.  At present, I left it up to the
module.

LSM changes:

The patch adds two new LSM hooks: xfrm_policy_delete and
xfrm_state_delete.  The new hooks are necessary to authorize deletion
of IPsec policies that have security contexts.  The existing hooks
xfrm_policy_free and xfrm_state_free lack the context to do the
authorization, so I decided to split authorization of deletion and
memory management of security data, as is typical in the LSM
interface.

Use:

The new delete hooks are checked when xfrm_policy or xfrm_state are
deleted by either the xfrm_user interface (xfrm_get_policy,
xfrm_del_sa) or the pfkey interface (pfkey_spddelete, pfkey_delete).

SELinux changes:

The new policy_delete and state_delete functions are added.
Signed-off-by: NCatherine Zhang <cxzhang@watson.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrent Jaeger <tjaeger@cse.psu.edu>
Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 cec6f7f3
......@@ -805,31 +805,37 @@ struct swap_info_struct;
* used by the XFRM system.
* @sec_ctx contains the security context information being provided by
* the user-level policy update program (e.g., setkey).
* Allocate a security structure to the xp->selector.security field.
* Allocate a security structure to the xp->security field.
* The security field is initialized to NULL when the xfrm_policy is
* allocated.
* Return 0 if operation was successful (memory to allocate, legal context)
* @xfrm_policy_clone_security:
* @old contains an existing xfrm_policy in the SPD.
* @new contains a new xfrm_policy being cloned from old.
* Allocate a security structure to the new->selector.security field
* that contains the information from the old->selector.security field.
* Allocate a security structure to the new->security field
* that contains the information from the old->security field.
* Return 0 if operation was successful (memory to allocate).
* @xfrm_policy_free_security:
* @xp contains the xfrm_policy
* Deallocate xp->selector.security.
* Deallocate xp->security.
* @xfrm_policy_delete_security:
* @xp contains the xfrm_policy.
* Authorize deletion of xp->security.
* @xfrm_state_alloc_security:
* @x contains the xfrm_state being added to the Security Association
* Database by the XFRM system.
* @sec_ctx contains the security context information being provided by
* the user-level SA generation program (e.g., setkey or racoon).
* Allocate a security structure to the x->sel.security field. The
* Allocate a security structure to the x->security field. The
* security field is initialized to NULL when the xfrm_state is
* allocated.
* Return 0 if operation was successful (memory to allocate, legal context).
* @xfrm_state_free_security:
* @x contains the xfrm_state.
* Deallocate x>sel.security.
* Deallocate x->security.
* @xfrm_state_delete_security:
* @x contains the xfrm_state.
* Authorize deletion of x->security.
* @xfrm_policy_lookup:
* @xp contains the xfrm_policy for which the access control is being
* checked.
......@@ -1298,8 +1304,10 @@ struct security_operations {
int (*xfrm_policy_alloc_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
int (*xfrm_policy_clone_security) (struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new);
void (*xfrm_policy_free_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int (*xfrm_policy_delete_security) (struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int (*xfrm_state_alloc_security) (struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
void (*xfrm_state_free_security) (struct xfrm_state *x);
int (*xfrm_state_delete_security) (struct xfrm_state *x);
int (*xfrm_policy_lookup)(struct xfrm_policy *xp, u32 sk_sid, u8 dir);
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM */
......@@ -2934,11 +2942,21 @@ static inline void security_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
security_ops->xfrm_policy_free_security(xp);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return security_ops->xfrm_policy_delete_security(xp);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx)
{
return security_ops->xfrm_state_alloc_security(x, sec_ctx);
}
static inline int security_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
return security_ops->xfrm_state_delete_security(x);
}
static inline void security_xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
security_ops->xfrm_state_free_security(x);
......@@ -2963,6 +2981,11 @@ static inline void security_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
}
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int security_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx)
{
return 0;
......@@ -2972,6 +2995,11 @@ static inline void security_xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
}
static inline int security_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int security_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_policy *xp, u32 sk_sid, u8 dir)
{
return 0;
......
......@@ -1454,21 +1454,23 @@ static int pfkey_delete(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg *h
if (x == NULL)
return -ESRCH;
if ((err = security_xfrm_state_delete(x)))
goto out;
if (xfrm_state_kern(x)) {
xfrm_state_put(x);
return -EPERM;
err = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
err = xfrm_state_delete(x);
if (err < 0) {
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
if (err < 0)
goto out;
c.seq = hdr->sadb_msg_seq;
c.pid = hdr->sadb_msg_pid;
c.event = XFRM_MSG_DELSA;
km_state_notify(x, &c);
out:
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
......@@ -2274,11 +2276,14 @@ static int pfkey_spddelete(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg
err = 0;
if ((err = security_xfrm_policy_delete(xp)))
goto out;
c.seq = hdr->sadb_msg_seq;
c.pid = hdr->sadb_msg_pid;
c.event = XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY;
km_policy_notify(xp, pol->sadb_x_policy_dir-1, &c);
out:
xfrm_pol_put(xp);
return err;
}
......
......@@ -427,23 +427,25 @@ static int xfrm_del_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void **xfrma)
if (x == NULL)
return -ESRCH;
if (err = security_xfrm_state_delete(x))
goto out;
if (xfrm_state_kern(x)) {
xfrm_state_put(x);
return -EPERM;
err = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
err = xfrm_state_delete(x);
if (err < 0) {
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
if (err < 0)
goto out;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
c.pid = nlh->nlmsg_pid;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
km_state_notify(x, &c);
xfrm_state_put(x);
out:
xfrm_state_put(x);
return err;
}
......@@ -1055,6 +1057,8 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void **xfr
MSG_DONTWAIT);
}
} else {
if (err = security_xfrm_policy_delete(xp))
goto out;
c.data.byid = p->index;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
......@@ -1064,6 +1068,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void **xfr
xfrm_pol_put(xp);
out:
return err;
}
......
......@@ -810,6 +810,11 @@ static void dummy_xfrm_policy_free_security(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
}
static int dummy_xfrm_policy_delete_security(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
return 0;
}
static int dummy_xfrm_state_alloc_security(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx)
{
return 0;
......@@ -819,6 +824,11 @@ static void dummy_xfrm_state_free_security(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
}
static int dummy_xfrm_state_delete_security(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
return 0;
}
static int dummy_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_policy *xp, u32 sk_sid, u8 dir)
{
return 0;
......@@ -1024,8 +1034,10 @@ void security_fixup_ops (struct security_operations *ops)
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_alloc_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_clone_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_free_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_delete_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_state_alloc_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_state_free_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_state_delete_security);
set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_lookup);
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM */
#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
......
......@@ -4374,8 +4374,10 @@ static struct security_operations selinux_ops = {
.xfrm_policy_alloc_security = selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc,
.xfrm_policy_clone_security = selinux_xfrm_policy_clone,
.xfrm_policy_free_security = selinux_xfrm_policy_free,
.xfrm_policy_delete_security = selinux_xfrm_policy_delete,
.xfrm_state_alloc_security = selinux_xfrm_state_alloc,
.xfrm_state_free_security = selinux_xfrm_state_free,
.xfrm_state_delete_security = selinux_xfrm_state_delete,
.xfrm_policy_lookup = selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup,
#endif
};
......
......@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_policy *old, struct xfrm_policy *new);
void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp);
int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
void selinux_xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x);
int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x);
int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_policy *xp, u32 sk_sid, u8 dir);
/*
......
......@@ -132,10 +132,7 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp, struct xfrm_us
goto out;
/*
* Does the subject have permission to set security or permission to
* do the relabel?
* Must be permitted to relabel from default socket type (process type)
* to specified context
* Does the subject have permission to set security context?
*/
rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
......@@ -200,6 +197,23 @@ void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
kfree(ctx);
}
/*
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled policies.
*/
int selinux_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
{
struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security;
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = xp->security;
int rc = 0;
if (ctx)
rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
return rc;
}
/*
* LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers sec_ctx spec to
* xfrm_state.
......@@ -292,6 +306,23 @@ u32 selinux_socket_getpeer_dgram(struct sk_buff *skb)
return SECSID_NULL;
}
/*
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled SAs.
*/
int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security;
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
int rc = 0;
if (ctx)
rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
return rc;
}
/*
* LSM hook that controls access to unlabelled packets. If
* a xfrm_state is authorizable (defined by macro) then it was
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册