drbd: introduce drbd_recv_header_maybe_unplug
Recently, drbd_recv_header() was changed to potentially implicitly "unplug" the backend device(s), in case there is currently nothing to receive. Be more explicit about it: re-introduce the original drbd_recv_header(), and introduce a new drbd_recv_header_maybe_unplug() for use by the receiver "main loop". Using explicit plugging via blk_start_plug(); blk_finish_plug(); really helps the io-scheduler of the backend with merging requests. Wrap the receiver "main loop" with such a plug. Also catch unplug events on the Primary, and try to propagate. This is performance relevant. Without this, if the receiving side does not merge requests, number of IOPS on the peer can me significantly higher than IOPS on the Primary, and can easily become the bottleneck. Together, both changes should help to reduce the number of IOPS as seen on the backend of the receiving side, by increasing the chance of merging mergable requests, without trading latency for more throughput. Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录