posix-cpu-timers: Fix rearm racing against process tick
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.54 commit 6e81e2c38a3844a978f90df81ec3302cb3ac4560 bugzilla: 175586 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DVDU Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=6e81e2c38a3844a978f90df81ec3302cb3ac4560 -------------------------------- commit 1a3402d9 upstream. Since the process wide cputime counter is started locklessly from posix_cpu_timer_rearm(), it can be concurrently stopped by operations on other timers from the same thread group, such as in the following unlucky scenario: CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- timer_settime(TIMER B) posix_cpu_timer_rearm(TIMER A) cpu_clock_sample_group() (pct->timers_active already true) handle_posix_cpu_timers() check_process_timers() stop_process_timers() pct->timers_active = false arm_timer(TIMER A) tick -> run_posix_cpu_timers() // sees !pct->timers_active, ignore // our TIMER A Fix this with simply locking process wide cputime counting start and timer arm in the same block. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Fixes: 60f2ceaa ("posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录