提交 bffd2b61 编写于 作者: M Max Gurtovoy 提交者: Keith Busch

nvmet: fix PSDT field check in command format

PSDT field section according to NVM_Express-1.3:
"This field specifies whether PRPs or SGLs are used for any data
transfer associated with the command. PRPs shall be used for all
Admin commands for NVMe over PCIe. SGLs shall be used for all Admin
and I/O commands for NVMe over Fabrics. This field shall be set to
01b for NVMe over Fabrics 1.0 implementations.
Suggested-by: NIdan Burstein <idanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NMax Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
上级 9bd82b1a
......@@ -520,9 +520,12 @@ bool nvmet_req_init(struct nvmet_req *req, struct nvmet_cq *cq,
goto fail;
}
/* either variant of SGLs is fine, as we don't support metadata */
if (unlikely((flags & NVME_CMD_SGL_ALL) != NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF &&
(flags & NVME_CMD_SGL_ALL) != NVME_CMD_SGL_METASEG)) {
/*
* For fabrics, PSDT field shall describe metadata pointer (MPTR) that
* contains an address of a single contiguous physical buffer that is
* byte aligned.
*/
if (unlikely((flags & NVME_CMD_SGL_ALL) != NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF)) {
status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_SC_DNR;
goto fail;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册